I FUCKED UP THE THREAD, Rate Prettyboy Omegle Youtuber, Tomer Lawton

RATE

  • 4 psl

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • 4.5 psl

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • 5 psl

    Votes: 5 19.2%
  • 5.5 psl

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • 6 psl

    Votes: 3 11.5%
  • 6.5 psl

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7 psl

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 7.5 psl

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 8 psl

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    26
Deleted member 15363

Deleted member 15363

Stronger Alone
Joined
Sep 17, 2021
Posts
443
Reputation
674


Tumblr pxm9vd9LKg1up30xro1 1280
Tomer lawton 2
2323
Tomer lawton potrait


@N1666 @BBC_EMPIRE_RULER @looksmaxxer234 @kjsbdfiusdf @larsanova69 @Thompsonz @Preston @nastynas @OldVirgin @thecel @BugManBill @MarkCorrigan @subhuman incel @AlwaysHaveQuestions @Chad1212
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2968, Acnno and Jason Voorhees
sorry guys I rate now pls
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
15363
 

Attachments

  • 15363.gif
    15363.gif
    662.2 KB · Views: 49
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: gamma, Jason Voorhees and Deleted member 15363
his side profile is very good, but his front is meh, probably around 5PSL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, sly shinkai, .👽. and 3 others
5
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Deleted member 15363
imo he looks better in motion then he does in photos
in his vids his like a 6 psl
 
  • +1
Reactions: sly shinkai, Lolcel, Jason Voorhees and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363 and Jason Voorhees
gl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
looks chad in the video
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363 and Jason Voorhees
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15306, Lolcel, mulattomaxxer and 3 others
just looks like an nt teenage faggot from us in his videos and actually looks worse in his model pics ahahahaha

this is why hasanabi is so thirsted over if this is ''10''
yeah lol

i was lowkey shocked when I saw his modeling photos
it's weird i dunno if it's the quality of the webcam but his like a 6psl in his vids
 
He is Chad.

Any looksmaxx blackpiller that can't see he is Chad, because he lacks "masculinity". Is not well versed enough yet, in lookism.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15306, bugeye and Deleted member 15363
He is Chad.

Any looksmaxx blackpiller that can't see he is Chad, because he lacks "masculinity". Is not well versed enough yet, in lookism.
agreed
 
I see guys like this in the bus station near school
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted member 15306, Biiyo03 and 1 other person
He is Chad.

Any looksmaxx blackpiller that can't see he is Chad, because he lacks "masculinity". Is not well versed enough yet, in lookism.
what makes him a chad in ur eyes
 
what makes him a chad in ur eyes
A man his facial attractiveness looks, is defined by these below 4 features.

These 2 features matter MOST for facial attractiveness:
* averageness (and proportionality)
* neotony (this includes features: skin quality, hair)

The following features are significantly less important, but do matter for sure also, but limited
- symmatry
- dhymorpism (masculinity)

****
This dude scores extremely good on neotony.
He scores very very good on averageness (and proportionality)
He scores average on dhymorpism/masculinity
He scores very goos on symmatry also.

So, overall a Chad.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: HighTierNormie
A man his facial attractiveness looks, is defined by these below 4 features.

These 2 features matter MOST for facial attractiveness:
* averageness (and proportionality)
* neotony (this includes features: skin quality, hair)

The following features are significantly less important, but do matter for sure also, but limited
- symmatry
- dhymorpism (masculinity)

****
This dude scores extremely good on neotony.
He scores very very good on averageness (and proportionality)
He scores average on dhymorpism/masculinity
He scores very goos on symmatry also.

So, overall a Chad.
very good breakdown
 
  • +1
Reactions: eduardkoopman
He looks alot better in his omegle videos in comparison to his model shoots.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03 and Deleted member 15363
A man his facial attractiveness looks, is defined by these below 4 features.

These 2 features matter MOST for facial attractiveness:
* averageness (and proportionality)
* neotony (this includes features: skin quality, hair)

The following features are significantly less important, but do matter for sure also, but limited
- symmatry
- dhymorpism (masculinity)

****
This dude scores extremely good on neotony.
He scores very very good on averageness (and proportionality)
He scores average on dhymorpism/masculinity
He scores very goos on symmatry also.

So, overall a Chad.
I like ur breakdown. but I think past 6 psl you need to be more detailed, but I still like it to be honest.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363
  • +1
Reactions: mulattomaxxer and Deleted member 15363
I like ur breakdown. but I think past 6 psl you need to be more detailed, but I still like it to be honest.
Past PSL6 imo, it becomes kinda irrelevant , for daily life. Basically womeen will simp for you, when you are PSL6 or above. Only for modelling, is matters above that level. imo.

It's true, rating can be more detailed in this case.

I chose in this case, to rate based on these brought 4 factors.
BECAUSE, it's grossly overlooked in this forum.


Some people here. tend to rate based on 1 detail. Which is total copium. First imo, rating needs to happen across these 4 basic metrics I desribed.
AND, after that, desections can be done about specific facial features, details.

But you have dudes here on this forum that jump into details of a guy his face straight up (ignoring the wider overall picture), that be like. He lacks masculinity, look at his soy ..... -> so I rate him:

probably around 5PSL
I see guys like this in the bus station near school
 
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03, Deleted member 15363 and mulattomaxxer
Past PSL6 imo, it becomes kinda irrelevant , for daily life. Basically womeen will simp for you, when you are PSL6 or above. Only for modelling, is matters above that level. imo.

It's true, rating can be more detailed in this case.

I chose in this case, to rate based on these brought 4 factors.
BECAUSE, it's grossly overlooked in this forum.


Some people here. tend to rate based on 1 detail. Which is total copium. First imo, rating needs to happen across these 4 basic metrics I desribed.
AND, after that, desections can be done about specific facial features, details.

But you have dudes here on this forum that jump into details of a guy his face straight up (ignoring the wider overall picture), that be like. He lacks masculinity, look at his soy ..... -> so I rate him:
would u say he has good bone structure ?
 
Past PSL6 imo, it becomes kinda irrelevant , for daily life. Basically womeen will simp for you, when you are PSL6 or above. Only for modelling, is matters above that level. imo.

It's true, rating can be more detailed in this case.

I chose in this case, to rate based on these brought 4 factors.
BECAUSE, it's grossly overlooked in this forum.


Some people here. tend to rate based on 1 detail. Which is total copium. First imo, rating needs to happen across these 4 basic metrics I desribed.
AND, after that, desections can be done about specific facial features, details.

But you have dudes here on this forum that jump into details of a guy his face straight up (ignoring the wider overall picture), that be like. He lacks masculinity, look at his soy ..... -> so I rate him:
agreed about everything
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363
Every time I go on Omegle it’s just guys jerking off, how do these youtubers find hot girls?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 15363
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03
would u say he has good bone structure ?
Yes, It's for sure a bone structure that makes his facial features score very high on: averageness and thus good proportions.

Averganeness, might the number 1 most important feature in attractiveness! Actually, I beleive it to be so. It's important to score high on the factor averageness, and than one can deviate from bit a bit but only when the deviation is more attractive (like better canthil tilt, and still be rpoportionae with rest)

Some education material on the factor Averageness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363
Yes, It's for sure a bone structure that makes his facial features score very high on: averageness and thus good proportions.

Averganeness, might the number 1 most important feature in attractiveness! Actually, I beleive it to be so. It's important to score high on the factor averageness, and than one can deviate from bit a bit but only when the deviation is more attractive (like better canthil tilt, and still be rpoportionae with rest)

Some education material on the factor Averageness.
oh good
i am have a similar bone structure to him, but my cheekbones are a bit higher
 
oh good
i am have a similar bone structure to him, but my cheekbones are a bit higher
cool.
but i have to say, a few mm's or cm can make a big difference already, in rating. It's brutals like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15363
cool.
but i have to say, a few mm's or cm can make a big difference already, in rating. It's brutals like that
thats really
true you said u were a 6psl
when did ur looks start to plummet
 
true you said u were a 6psl
I didn't say that. Or i misstyped somewhere
I'm no where near a PSL6.

I used to be PSL3.5 orso ranges.

Now, I'm in my opion in the 75-80 percentile ranges. Which is like PSL 4.5 ranges.
I hope to ascend to PSL 5. That's muh maybe possible limit.

when did ur looks start to plummet
I was always PSL3.5 orso. I didn't decend yet.
Actually I started looking better since I started looksmaxxing since muh mid to later 30's.

To asses it.
here the pics.

me at 17
q4-jpg.653501



me at 23
q3-jpg.653508



me at 28
img_7801-jpg.653553



me at 32
p1050142-jpg.653575



me at 35 last year, before starting to looskamxx for the first time in life
twcspwz-jpg.653585



me at 36 and onwards after looksmaxxing
p2aok400golhco8s-jpg.653587
Dec 2020
Kjhkfjhdfjkgdgdg
 
  • +1
Reactions: zipzam and Kroker
I didn't say that. Or i misstyped somewhere
I'm no where near a PSL6.

I used to be PSL3.5 orso ranges.

Now, I'm in my opion in the 75-80 percentile ranges. Which is like PSL 4.5 ranges.
I hope to ascend to PSL 5. That's muh maybe possible limit.


I was always PSL3.5 orso. I didn't decend yet.
Actually I started looking better since I started looksmaxxing since muh mid to later 30's.

To asses it.
here the pics.

me at 17
q4-jpg.653501



me at 23
q3-jpg.653508



me at 28
img_7801-jpg.653553



me at 32
p1050142-jpg.653575



me at 35 last year, before starting to looskamxx for the first time in life
twcspwz-jpg.653585



me at 36 and onwards after looksmaxxing
p2aok400golhco8s-jpg.653587
View attachment 1343796 View attachment 1343802
How old are you now? what did you do to keep your hair? Man you got much better in the last 3 pics congratz!
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kroker

Similar threads

Deleted member 15363
Replies
4
Views
2K
subhuman incel
subhuman incel
Deleted member 15363
Replies
21
Views
2K
Lolcel
Lolcel
Deleted member 15363
Replies
11
Views
469
Deleted member 3041
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top