uksucks
Apricot
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2024
- Posts
- 4,325
- Reputation
- 6,229
Tldr:
WW: 6/10 top 25%
Nero: 6.5 (within top 20-15% given his distribution)
FaceIQ: 5.5/10, top 36%
inb4 why would you pay them, to see how they'd differ, to get as many opinions, because idek what I look like, I never took pics of my face until I got a DSLR + tripod recently as lens distortion ruins my already long narrower face.
Wheat waffles listed 13 good features including good chin projection, jawline good forward growth, good facial definition and low bf%
He listed 4 bad features: large eye orbits, low set zygos, thin lips, under eye redness.
Nero is much more detailed only 5$ too. List every feature and gives a rating /5.
He said best features mandible length and visibility, high set zygos (WW said low set), and other general good features eye spacing etc..
He said worst features chin lacks projection, dorsal hump and midface is too long , it's 0.89 I believe.
FaceIQ said best features: canthal tilt, good lashes, eye spacing, aspect ratio.
Worst features: mouth region, nose shape, flared ears (tbf Nero said 3.25/5 for ear shape), recessed lower third (direct contradiction to WW)
FaceIQ: said I need to get leaner (I'm already quite lean grok quessed 12% bf but OK), tan, other soft maxes like brow density
He said I need trimax, lip filler, lip commissuroplasty, lip lift, rhino, infra implants, fat grafting, canthoplasty, supra implants, otoplasty.
Brutal lol
tbh now idk what to do: only things they agreed on were under eye region. I know my midface is too long, idk if bimax actually fixes that though or just lio lift, my Philtrum is a bit long + I can see Genio would definitely clearly make me look a lot better.
WW: 6/10 top 25%
Nero: 6.5 (within top 20-15% given his distribution)
FaceIQ: 5.5/10, top 36%
inb4 why would you pay them, to see how they'd differ, to get as many opinions, because idek what I look like, I never took pics of my face until I got a DSLR + tripod recently as lens distortion ruins my already long narrower face.
Wheat waffles listed 13 good features including good chin projection, jawline good forward growth, good facial definition and low bf%
He listed 4 bad features: large eye orbits, low set zygos, thin lips, under eye redness.
Nero is much more detailed only 5$ too. List every feature and gives a rating /5.
He said best features mandible length and visibility, high set zygos (WW said low set), and other general good features eye spacing etc..
He said worst features chin lacks projection, dorsal hump and midface is too long , it's 0.89 I believe.
FaceIQ said best features: canthal tilt, good lashes, eye spacing, aspect ratio.
Worst features: mouth region, nose shape, flared ears (tbf Nero said 3.25/5 for ear shape), recessed lower third (direct contradiction to WW)
FaceIQ: said I need to get leaner (I'm already quite lean grok quessed 12% bf but OK), tan, other soft maxes like brow density
He said I need trimax, lip filler, lip commissuroplasty, lip lift, rhino, infra implants, fat grafting, canthoplasty, supra implants, otoplasty.
Brutal lol
tbh now idk what to do: only things they agreed on were under eye region. I know my midface is too long, idk if bimax actually fixes that though or just lio lift, my Philtrum is a bit long + I can see Genio would definitely clearly make me look a lot better.
