I hate when low IQ retards try to disprove scientific theories

Deleted member 16984

Deleted member 16984

Solstice
Joined
Jan 3, 2022
Posts
2,253
Reputation
3,057
It's usually in regards to physics ("the big bang") or biology (evolution). I doubt you niggers could get through the first page of a physics textbook, but somehow you've outsmarted the world's smartest people...:rolleyes:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9670, Deleted member 15305, MiroslavBulldosex and 11 others
You should tag me next time

Do not worry majority of people are also fooled by Gorillas you are not alone

but we can see they are not real
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 16984
religious cucks have to cope somehow
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiroslavBulldosex
you admitted theyre only theories in the title, literally someone's opinion
if you wanna be a cuck and take blindly believe media's opinions, go ahead
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted member 15569, Gargantuan and 9 others
you admitted theyre only theories in the title, literally someone's opinion
if you wanna be a cuck and take blindly believe media's opinions, go ahead

The meaning of the term scientific theory (often contracted to theory for brevity) as used in the disciplines of science is significantly different from the common vernacular usage of theory.[6][note 1] In everyday speech, theory can imply an explanation that represents an unsubstantiated and speculative guess,[6] whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and is widely accepted as valid.[1][2][3]
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17174, Mewton, MikeMew'sBitch and 1 other person
The meaning of the term scientific theory (often contracted to theory for brevity) as used in the disciplines of science is significantly different from the common vernacular usage of theory.[6][note 1] In everyday speech, theory can imply an explanation that represents an unsubstantiated and speculative guess,[6] whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and is widely accepted as valid.[1][2][3]
most scientific theories are just someone's opinions and have no proof
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17174, Mewton and Deleted member 14905
cuck
you would believe in anything they tell you :forcedsmile:
reminder youre literally blindly believing in scientific writing like religious people believe in the bible, you never tested anything for yourself
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Toth's thot and JFL
you admitted theyre only theories in the title, literally someone's opinion
if you wanna be a cuck and take blindly believe media's opinions, go ahead
That's not what theory means...
 
cuck
you would believe in anything they tell you :forcedsmile:
reminder youre literally blindly believing in scientific writing like religious people believe in the bible, you never tested anything for yourself
?

science doesn't require belief unlike your fairy tales

doesn't matter what i think about gravity a ball will stall fall to the ground when I let go of it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mewton
@Pansexual Goddess @cloUder
Dumb and dumber
 
  • +1
Reactions: BearBoy
?

science doesn't require belief unlike your fairy tales

doesn't matter what i think about gravity a ball will stall fall to the ground when I let go of it
sure, but there can be an infinite amount of explanations for it
yet you belive a specific one written out on a book and youve never seen it for youself
youre just religiously believing in a book
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
@Pansexual Goddess @cloUder
Dumb and dumber
stfu

all you do is make snarky comments from an imagined position of superiority, it's honestly pretty cringe
 
sure, but there can be an infinite amount of explanations for it
yet you belive a specific one written out on a book and youve never seen it for youself
youre just religiously believing in a book
the inverse square law isn't debatable
 
Science is wrong, It's all a theory you don't really even know it yourself you are just guessing and you want everyone to think like yourself but you are the real low iq one for believing in a massive lie that everyone believes, Science didn't come from nowhere we got it from our past which we know nothing about all the scientists are just guessing they really don't know its a hypothesis
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Hikicel69, Deleted member 14918, BearBoy and 1 other person
Don't even try to argue with this faggot soy he is a low iq sheep who follows and can never lead that's why people like this are weak faggots who like their own gender and are abominations to this earth and god and they will pay with their souls in the afterlife we all will repent and accept god's judgment and not all of us will burn in a fiery pit of pain
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15569 and Deleted member 13787
It's usually in regards to physics ("the big bang") or biology (evolution). I doubt you niggers could get through the first page of a physics textbook, but somehow you've outsmarted the world's smartest people...:rolleyes:
d1d.jpg
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15004, Deleted member 15569, Deleted member 14774 and 4 others
religious cucks have to cope somehow
Shut up faggot, Keep sucking cock you disgrace to this earth no wonder you don't like religion, You will never be allowed in the heavens for all your sins and your relations with satan, You will burn for all of eternity until your soul can handle no more i hope you are ready to repent you disgusting faggot freak
 
niggas here dispute proven scientific theories yet believe in religious book written by group of random jews 2000 years ago
 
  • +1
Reactions: thegoat, Enfant terrible and BearBoy
Believing the opinion of someone because of the status you perceive them to have over a person who you perceive to have no status regardless of the quality argument is the most obvious sign that someone is low IQ and can't think for themselves so worships the opinion of those that they deem to be superior to them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5189
Believing the opinion of someone because of the status you perceive them to have over a person who you perceive to have no status regardless of the quality argument is the most obvious sign that someone is low IQ and can't think for themselves so worships the opinion of those that they deem to be superior to them
They're not just opinions, and the appeal to authority fallacy is bullshit. If your car is fucked up, you go to the mechanic, you don't go to the local incel that "disproved" mechanics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14918 and BearBoy
Don't even try to argue with this faggot soy he is a low iq sheep who follows and can never lead that's why people like this are weak faggots who like their own gender and are abominations to this earth and god and they will pay with their souls in the afterlife we all will repent and accept god's judgment and not all of us will burn in a fiery pit of pain
Low IQ sheep are religious cucks, they are all the same just like hindus, christians, muslims same ideas same shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14918
Imagine not being a deist and just believing in God
 
It's usually in regards to physics ("the big bang") or biology (evolution). I doubt you niggers could get through the first page of a physics textbook, but somehow you've outsmarted the world's smartest people...:rolleyes:
Cope, socially secluded men on obscure forums are the most knowledgeable about science
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Toth's thot, Deleted member 16984, hebbewem and 1 other person
I hate when low IQ retards try to disprove scientific theories

 
and of course someone of superior intellect is seething over ,,low iq people" spewing their opinions
 
whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and is widely accepted as valid.
So the same thing only it's widely accepted as valid?? Pretty much no fucking difference jfl
 
There are some very smart people dealing with evolutionary biology. But the implications of evolution are often denied by the majority. More specifically, adaptive evolution.
 
most scientific theories are just someone's opinions and have no proof
No proof except rigorous testing and peer reviews
 
in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and is widely accepted as valid.
Maybe sometimes. At other times, people will deny one aspect, because they don't like it very much. Then only some will accept it as valid. Adaptive evolution was accepted by the smart anthropologist Harpending, but was not accepted by other more average anthropologists. Those often don't know any genetics to speak of.

For example, some anthropologist said that it was "immoral" to even consider racial explanations of existing health disparities: but almost all of the extra risk of kidney failure in blacks boils down to two alleles that protect against sleeping sickness.
 
No proof except rigorous testing and peer reviews
Depending on the topic, peer review can just become a circlejerk. Some bogus studies got through peer review as a joke. Basically a prank on academia.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitchwhipper2
"Science" is just niggas trying to find the best possible approximation to a phenomenon. It's cope. It's cringe. At least religion is completely dogmatic.

Mathematics mogs hard tho
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: oatmeal, Bitchwhipper2 and Deleted member 16984
There's zero proof of the big bang theory

And theres zero proof that genetic mutations occur in nature with no man-made conditions
 
Then why do you call 'retards' the unbelievers, those who don't follow blindly the scientific dogma?
Stop trying to frame it as a religion, that's cringe, and I call them retards because they are. These are people that would be incapable of doing well in undergraduate physics classes, but want to lecture us on the most advanced physics topics
 
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem
There are some very smart people dealing with evolutionary biology. But the implications of evolution are often denied by the majority. More specifically, adaptive evolution.
seriously caging at you if this guy is your idol or something

The SPLC notes he attributed stereotypes of different human populations to genetic differences, often saying that Africans, Papua New Guineans, and "Baltimore"[26] (African-Americans) possess the same genetic temperamental predispositions which he said are characterized by "violence, laziness, and a preference for 'mating instead of parenting'",[27] while Europeans and East Asians "have evolved higher intelligence and 'tend to be more disciplined than people who take life for granted'";[27] that he favored mass deportation of illegal immigrants from the United States using FEMA camps as part of the process and did not believe that more money should be spent on education in the United States because he thought the race-based disparities are based on genetics rather than disparities in funding; that he gave conferences at what the SPLC designates as white supremacist groups; and that he supported eugenics, crediting it in the form of the death penalty for the "genetic pacification" of the western European population.[26]

Harpending once stated that people of sub-Saharan ancestry do not have the same genetic propensity for "hard work" as Eurasians do.

he sounds like a retard. any observed difference jumps straight to muh genetics
 
Depending on the topic, peer review can just become a circlejerk. Some bogus studies got through peer review as a joke. Basically a prank on academia.
True ngl.

But him saying "no proof" is judt a low IQ cope
 
Stop trying to frame it as a religion, that's cringe, and I call them retards because they are. These are people that would be incapable of doing well in undergraduate physics classes, but want to lecture us on the most advanced physics topics
Earth is flat I have a degree in physics
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16984
you admitted theyre only theories in the title, literally someone's opinion
if you wanna be a cuck and take blindly believe media's opinions, go ahead
reminder this guy watches XQC
 
seriously caging at you if this guy is your idol or something



he sounds like a retard. any observed difference jumps straight to muh genetics
He is smarter. Way smarter than you. Making observed phenotypic differences go away is something that genetics can't do.
 

Similar threads

Baban
Replies
21
Views
2K
johnny4612
J
nulll
Replies
42
Views
3K
melon6329
melon6329
lestoa
Replies
22
Views
3K
kanderior
kanderior

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top