"I have a long philtrum!" No, you just have an underdeveloped lower jaw

[luckycel]

So tired of these normie foids coping about their "philtrum" being long when they literally need double jaw surgery, No, becky, it's not the distance between your nose and your lips, it's your whole disgusting recessed lower jaw. Istg its always these foids trying to make looking good seem more arbitrary than it really is

 

[aids]

Whole lot of buzz words.
You don’t even know what arbitrary means.
Nor does anyone care.

 

[luckycel]

Whole lot of buzz words.
You don’t even know what arbitrary means.
Nor does anyone care.

Is arbitrary a big word for you? Just say you're a brainlet who didn't understand my post

 

[ThePrinceOfPersia]

Is arbitrary a big word for you? Just say you're a brainlet who didn't understand my post

you do NOT know who you're saying that to

 

[luckycel]

you do NOT know who you're saying that to

I frankly don't care. If he's so smart, he should try giving a counterargument against my post, not randomly attacking me for supposedly not knowing what the word "arbitrary" means

 

[aids]

Is arbitrary a big word for you? Just say you're a brainlet who didn't understand my post

So tired of these normie foids coping about their "philtrum" being long when they literally need double jaw surgery, No, becky, it's not the distance between your nose and your lips, it's your whole disgusting recessed lower jaw. Istg its always these foids trying to make looking good seem more arbitrary than it really is

Arbitrary meaning irrational/unjust.
In reality, you mean they are isolating looking good to a few simple features, but often it's implicit that having good x feature means you have a good y feature.
The distance between your nose and your lips is very obviously impacted by your maxillofacial development, so I don't understand what you're saying here. Do you feel the need to rant because not everybody obsesses over facial ratios like some of us on this forum? Shocking that because somebody is a "normie" you consider them inferior JFL

Nobody cares tbh dude, go rant about your actually-arbitrary hatred for women in off topic.

 

[zaebalsya]

So tired of these normie foids coping about their "philtrum" being long when they literally need double jaw surgery, No, becky, it's not the distance between your nose and your lips, it's your whole disgusting recessed lower jaw. Istg its always these foids trying to make looking good seem more arbitrary than it really is

Jaw surgery dont fix ur philtrum

 

[imontheloose]

Just make shit up theory

 

[luckycel]

The distance between your nose and your lips is very obviously impacted by your maxillofacial development, so I don't understand what you're saying here. Do you feel the need to rant because not everybody obsesses over facial ratios like some of us on this forum?

It's "very obviously" impacted by your maxillofacial development, yet most "normal" people don't realize that and talk about it as if it's just this arbitrary ratio rather than bad development. That was my point: a lot of people think the issue is their long philtrum, when that's really just a side effect of them having a poorly developed mandible. This isn't some obscure ratio. I think that most normal people can tell if someone has a short mandible(especially from the side), but for some reason, when they see it from the front, they think "long philtrum", not short mandible, which is really the root cause.

This is what comes up when you Google "long philtrum", and it's a very clear example of what I'm talking about. On the right, she has a short mandible and a recessed chin, yet people simplify that whole issue to "well, the distance from her mouth to her nose is long!" It's like, yeah, I guess that's true, but the reason that's the case is again, because of her short mandible, and you're incorrectly boiling that whole issue down to just the distance from her mouth to her nose.

Shocking that because somebody is a "normie" you consider them inferior JFL

You're just making shit up at this point. When did I say that I thought they were "inferior"? Even if I did, I'm free to think whatever I want, and I see no issue in having a subjective preference against most "normal" people.

Nobody cares tbh dude, go rant about your actually-arbitrary hatred for women in off topic.

Doesn't have anything to do with hating women, it's just that most of the people I've seen complaining about their "long philtrum" are women.

 

[luckycel]

Jaw surgery dont fix ur philtrum

Depends, I'd agree that some people have good mandibular development and low-set lips, but most of the time that's not the case, and their lips looking "low-set" is just a consequence of them having a short mandible, which WOULD be fixed by double jaw surgery

 

[richoxne]

dnr

 

[aids]

It's "very obviously" impacted by your maxillofacial development, yet most "normal" people don't realize that and talk about it as if it's just this arbitrary ratio rather than bad development. That was my point: a lot of people think the issue is their long philtrum, when that's really just a side effect of them having a poorly developed mandible. This isn't some obscure ratio. I think that most normal people can tell if someone has a short mandible(especially from the side), but for some reason, when they see it from the front, they think "long philtrum", not short mandible, which is really the root cause.
View attachment 4400475
This is what comes up when you Google "long philtrum", and it's a very clear example of what I'm talking about. On the right, she has a short mandible and a recessed chin, yet people simplify that whole issue to "well, the distance from her mouth to her nose is long!" It's like, yeah, I guess that's true, but the reason that's the case is again, because of her short mandible, and you're incorrectly boiling that whole issue down to just the distance from her mouth to her nose.

DNR, completely missed the point and used arbitrary wrong again. The word you’re looking for is irrelevant.

You're just making shit up at this point. When did I say that I thought they were "inferior"? Even if I did, I'm free to think whatever I want, and I see no issue in having a subjective preference against most "normal" people.

The term “foid” implies inferior, you never explicitly stated that but it’s very obviously implied.

Doesn't have anything to do with hating women, it's just that most of the people I've seen complaining about their "long philtrum" are women.

Again, the term “foid” is derogatory. You hate women for not caring as much about this as you.

Not responding to your dumbass further atp. Just do better JFL

 

[Whirr22222]

It’s just not that big of a deal unless it’s death tier like the Trump press secretary lady or NocturnalKent

 

[luckycel]

DNR, completely missed the point and used arbitrary wrong again. The word you’re looking for is irrelevant.

From Google: "Something that's arbitrary seems like it's chosen at random instead of following a consistent rule."

In this context, I AM using the word correctly, since I’m saying that when people fixate on philtrum length as if it’s the source of attractiveness, they’re treating it like an arbitrary trait, something that’s seemingly preferred for no functional or biological reason, the same way we might arbitrarily prefer one eye color over another(e.g. there's no reason women should prefer blue eyes, they're not a sign of good development or anything beneficial for survival so the preference is arbitrary, just like there's seemingly no reason people should prefer a specific mouth to nose length).

There’s an obvious evolutionary reason to prefer good mandibular development, because it reflects overall growth quality and good development/genes, but there’s no clear purpose in preferring a specific mouth-to-nose distance. So when people treat philtrum length as the thing that matters, they turn a meaningful developmental trait into something that looks like a random(arbitrary) aesthetic preference.

Using “irrelevant” wouldn’t fit here, because philtrum length is not meaningless or unconnected, it actually does reflect underlying jaw development, but focusing on it as the primary factor makes the preference seem random(or arbitrary).

The term “foid” implies inferior, you never explicitly stated that but it’s very obviously implied.

Bold of you to assume I meant to imply that. I mostly use the term because it sounds funny, not because I'm trying to dehumanize women. I also use the term moid a lot, they're just words. There's no need to be a white knight and protect the non-existent women on this forum who might get offended over me using "foid" to refer to them.

Again, the term “foid” is derogatory. You hate women for not caring as much about this as you.

Dude, you might be projecting. You sound like a gay leftist talking about microaggressions towards minorities. Like 90% of the users on this forum use the n-word, do you think they all hate black people? The word foid is so comical I can't even imagine using it as a serious derogatory term, it literally means female-oid

 

[aids]

From Google: "Something that's arbitrary seems like it's chosen at random instead of following a consistent rule."

In this context, I AM using the word correctly, since I’m saying that when people fixate on philtrum length as if it’s the source of attractiveness, they’re treating it like an arbitrary trait, something that’s seemingly preferred for no functional or biological reason, the same way we might arbitrarily prefer one eye color over another(e.g. there's no reason women should prefer blue eyes, they're not a sign of good development or anything beneficial for survival so the preference is arbitrary, just like there's seemingly no reason people should prefer a specific mouth to nose length).

There’s an obvious evolutionary reason to prefer good mandibular development, because it reflects overall growth quality and good development/genes, but there’s no clear purpose in preferring a specific mouth-to-nose distance. So when people treat philtrum length as the thing that matters, they turn a meaningful developmental trait into something that looks like a random(arbitrary) aesthetic preference.

Using “irrelevant” wouldn’t fit here, because philtrum length is not meaningless or unconnected, it actually does reflect underlying jaw development, but focusing on it as the primary factor makes the preference seem random(or arbitrary).

Bold of you to assume I meant to imply that. I mostly use the term because it sounds funny, not because I'm trying to dehumanize women. I also use the term moid a lot, they're just words. There's no need to be a white knight and protect the non-existent women on this forum who might get offended over me using "foid" to refer to them.

Dude, you might be projecting. You sound like a gay leftist talking about microaggressions towards minorities. Like 90% of the users on this forum use the n-word, do you think they all hate black people? The word foid is so comical I can't even imagine using it as a serious derogatory term, it literally means female-oid

DNR, agree to disagree.

 

[yooooooooooooochico]

Arbitrary meaning irrational/unjust.
In reality, you mean they are isolating looking good to a few simple features, but often it's implicit that having good x feature means you have a good y feature.
The distance between your nose and your lips is very obviously impacted by your maxillofacial development, so I don't understand what you're saying here. Do you feel the need to rant because not everybody obsesses over facial ratios like some of us on this forum? Shocking that because somebody is a "normie" you consider them inferior JFL

Nobody cares tbh dude, go rant about your actually-arbitrary hatred for women in off topic.

nigga trying to white knight for women on org

 

[epsilonic]

Whole lot of buzz words.
You don’t even know what arbitrary means.
Nor does anyone care.

 

[aids]

nigga trying to white knight for women on org

Not at all. I'm just calling OP a faggot cause nobody cares to hear ts.

 

[yooooooooooooochico]

Not at all. I'm just calling OP a faggot cause nobody cares to hear ts.

hes making some great points tho ngl, nigga how do you have 7k posts as a brainlet

 

[luckycel]

Not at all. I'm just calling OP a faggot cause nobody cares to hear ts.

Don't bully me, I'm gonna cry

 

[Dot1]

Just make shit up theory

But bro he's definitely so smart since he's using big smart intelligent and buzz words org needs more intelligent users !!!!