shedontluv-U
Disciple of Slayerjonas
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2026
- Posts
- 5,720
- Reputation
- 10,449
We keep the rule, but if we want to unban a gay user, they must have been beneficial to the community. We should ban those who contribute nothing, and the more a person is loved despite their gayposting more they gayposted more user we sacrifice, and we should sacrifice the toxic and mean ones that nobody like and are know gay
For example, harry was a cool dude who benefited everyone, so we unban him and ban @dragomog and @mr123456 instead
ban dragocuck + mrbitch = unban harry
It’s a win-win for everyone! Mods are happier because there’s less gayposting in the community, and the users are happy because cool dude can comeback because they are invested in looksmaxxing and loved by the community ( no gaypost anymore tho )
I call this 'The Sacrifice of trash' The more a user gayposts, the more we sacrifice other toxic gay user or just straight user who gaypost
@Panchitosbroncs @austrianpsycho @karmacitathugmaxx agree ?
if no fuck yall
For example, harry was a cool dude who benefited everyone, so we unban him and ban @dragomog and @mr123456 instead
ban dragocuck + mrbitch = unban harry
It’s a win-win for everyone! Mods are happier because there’s less gayposting in the community, and the users are happy because cool dude can comeback because they are invested in looksmaxxing and loved by the community ( no gaypost anymore tho )
I call this 'The Sacrifice of trash' The more a user gayposts, the more we sacrifice other toxic gay user or just straight user who gaypost
It’s just a joke lol, it’s not elaborate enough and the mods would never actually clarify the rule. The fact that the rule is fog is actually a plus for the mods
@Panchitosbroncs @austrianpsycho @karmacitathugmaxx agree ?
if no fuck yall


