
truecel_4
Make Greycels Great Again
- Joined
- May 4, 2025
- Posts
- 398
- Reputation
- 783
in some cases not allIQ tests are meaningless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
in some cases not allIQ tests are meaningless.
I legitimately got it in my in person test. My mom wanted to see if I was stupid but to her surprise my IQ ended up being significantly above averageThe sheer fact that you actually believe you are 126 iq makes you below average iq
Nah jk there are some pretty high iq users on hereWhy does everyone say this??
Stanford-BenetI am interested if he knows what test he took. Most patients know the name. And he probably remembers how long it was. And what items he answered
Iq isn't measurable. 99.9999999% people are dead average. The iq of people above this average is proportionally correlated to their academic achievementsStanford-Benet
I have poor academic achievementsIq isn't measurable. 99.9999999% people are dead average. The iq of people above this average is proportionally correlated to their academic achievements
@loyolaxavvierretard awfully convenient we haven't been shown this physical paper, eh? Despite it being spelled wrong.Stanford-Benet
having over 5k posts is unfortunately a sign of a decline in IQ considering you pretty much have to rot for that nowadays.Based on my threads and stuff does my IQ appear higher or lower than it actually is?
You're a pseudo-intellectual for disagreeing with OP, son. Well, at least according to his glorious high-IQ statements. Perhaps his poor academic achievements explains his posts better than this seemingly invisible test he took.having over 5k posts if unfortunately a sign of a decline in IQ considering you pretty much have to rot for that nowadays.
guess you dont have a mother anymoreI’m not Larping. I’m genuinely being honest. On my mother and everything
Online IQ tests are inaccurate anyway. And that's probably what he took.You're a pseudo-intellectual for disagreeing with OP, son. Well, at least according to his glorious high-IQ statements. Perhaps his poor academic achievements explains his posts better than this seemingly invisible test he took.
He alleges he took an in person test, the Stanford-Binet. Granted he spelled it wrong, but we'll forgive that. He also conveniently ignored @loyolaxavvierretard's post to show the paper. Interesting, eh?Online IQ tests are inaccurate anyway. And that's probably what he took.
You probably don’t need an IQ test. They were created as diagnostic tools for identifying extremes.Im kinda scared to get an IQ test because I know my shit is like 90 or something
98.2 percent accurate? BullshitHe alleges he took an in person test, the Stanford-Binet. Granted he spelled it wrong, but we'll forgive that. He also conveniently ignored @loyolaxavvierretard's post to show the paper. Interesting, eh?
Nonetheless, he claims online tests are 98.2% accurate. We must vary in IQ throughout the day seemingly if 10-15% variance on tests is common.![]()
Woah. Pseudo-intellectual. You are Brian Griffin because you disagreed with me! Muh IQ high! No, I won't share my test result's physical copy, how long it was, or the questions. I am nonchalant. I also perform awfully academically. But the blackpill is high IQ!98.2 percent accurate? Bullshit![]()
LmaoWoah. Pseudo-intellectual. You are Brian Griffin because you disagreed with me! Muh IQ high! No, I won't share my test result's physical copy, how long it was, or the questions. I am nonchalant. I also perform awfully academically. But the blackpill is high IQ!![]()