I have come to the conclusion that Rajputs are the most high T people in India

[Gengar]

There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

• They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

• They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

• They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

• They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

• Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.”

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.

 

[Gengar]

Today, they are 6% of the population in Rajasthan (Rajasthan means “the land of kings”).

Personally, I don’t support suicide or female infanticide, but I can’t stop myself from admitting they might be the most high T group of all of South Asia, even more high T than the Muslims. Or perhaps I’m conflating barbaric practices with high T levels.

 

[SomaliaSub5]

they all look the same so how can we tell the difference

 

[Gengar]

they all look the same so how can we tell the difference

You can easily distinguish them. Say you will cut off your daughter’s clitoris because it’s custom in Somalia; the Rajputs will be the only one giving you a fist bump.

 

[john2]

not high t to kill your own daughter

cause then there’s less women for each man

not high t to make sure your women are burnt if you die

being high t = caring less

no woman is going to be faithful to a man for life, even if the man is extremely good looking, but the rajputs couldn’t internalise this and instead brainwashed their women to jump into pits of fire

this is the very opposite of survival

 

[unstable]

except rajput is not a ethnic group but title bestowed by brahmins onto local landholders
all these are the features of landholding castes some came to be known as rajputs

landholding caste be it jats ahirs rors all have these features

and don't get me started on military prowess of indian brahmins (high steppe gangetic ones)
first group to be considered martial race by britain.

are you rajput
cuz lumping rajasthani and punjabi rajputs as nw ones is sem2sem

 

[Finnishmogger]

I’m watching a video about indian scammers right now JFL

 

[Jason Voorhees]

My gf is a Rajput too

 

[Jason Voorhees]

not high t to kill your own daughter

cause then there’s less women for each man

not high t to make sure your women are burnt if you die

being high t = caring less

no woman is going to be faithful to a man for life, even if the man is extremely good looking, but the rajputs couldn’t internalise this and instead brainwashed their women to jump into pits of fire

this is the very opposite of survival

How have you been bro?

 

[john2]

i will admit, the rajputs lookswise mog pretty much every other indian ethnic group of people, they’re fairer naturally than other indians, but are tanned and have well developed caucasoid faces (especially distinct sharp caucasoid noses)

the rajputs from rajasthan and the state of MP, delhi and gujarat look better than the average maharashtrian (i’m marathi), south indian, east indian and kashmiri

 

[john2]

How have you been bro?

sup man, how has life treated you lately?

i’ve been great

life is pretty fantastic

 

[unstable]

i will admit, the rajputs lookswise mog pretty much every other indian ethnic group of people, they’re fairer naturally than other indians, but are tanned and have well developed caucasoid faces (especially distinct sharp caucasoid noses)

the rajputs from rajasthan and the state of MP, delhi and gujarat look better than the average maharashtrian (i’m marathi), south indian, east indian and kashmiri

nigga kashmiri??? no one mogs kashmiris in the subcon
rajputs have high zagros.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

sup man, how has life treated you lately?

i’ve been great

life is pretty fantastic

Same for me come in my dms

 

[john2]

nigga kashmiri??? no one mogs kashmiris in the subcon
rajputs have high zagros.

kashmiris look too arab, which means more downward facial growth and hooked noses are more common, they're only considered moggers here because of light skin and light eye colours

rajputs look purely indian while still possessing caucasoid features

 

[BigBallsLarry]

You can easily distinguish them. Say you will cut off your daughter’s clitoris because it’s custom in Somalia; the Rajputs will be the only one giving you a fist bump.

 

[Lefty Rankin]

There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

• They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

• They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

• They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

• They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

• Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.”

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.

It's probably to do with culture and not testosterone.

What about them damn thuggees? Now those were some black hearted bastards if there ever was.

My father bought a book in the 90's called The Art of Death. It dissected thuggee methods of killing people without being seen. One of the ones that stuck out to me depicted walking up to someone behind and grabbing their testicles between their legs. When they instinctively lurch down you use their momentum by lifting on their balls with one hand and pressing down on the back of their head to smash their skull on the ground.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

@unstable have you seen that meme Sikhs Marathas vs British and this video

 

[unstable]

@unstable have you seen that meme Sikhs Marathas vs British and this video

i am a veteran observer of maratha rajput online war of course i have seen it

rajputs were fighting ahirs jats and marathas at the same time it was too damn funny

they were quoting snippets from book showing how they cucked each other it was too funny

 

[MiserableMan]

except rajput is not a ethnic group but title bestowed by brahmins onto local landholders
all these are the features of landholding castes some came to be known as rajputs

landholding caste be it jats ahirs rors all have these features

and don't get me started on military prowess of indian brahmins (high steppe gangetic ones)
first group to be considered martial race by britain.

are you rajput
cuz lumping rajasthani and punjabi rajputs as nw ones is sem2sem

Wrong, Rajputs were the warrior clans of Rajasthan which become nobility through conquest of the North part of sub-continent. Brahmins were also assimilated by these Rajput clans, some jatts and rors too are considered Rajputs but most are not. They were not bestowed the title by Brahmins.

 

[zeref74]

You forgot the fact they used to gift their daughters to Mughals also by the third generation (?) Mughals were more Rajput than Turkic Mongolic.

 

[unstable]

Wrong, Rajputs were the warrior clans of Rajasthan which become nobility through conquest of the North part of sub-continent. Brahmins were also assimilated by these Rajput clans, some jatts and rors too are considered Rajputs but most are not. They were not bestowed the title by Brahmins.

in rajasthan a kshatriya group was land owning elites of society.

they used rajanya and kshatriya as their title it is observable all throughout northern india.
rajput title originated in clans of malwa mewar and gujarat invented most probably by local brahmins.

 

[MiserableMan]

There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

• They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

• They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

• They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

• They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

• Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.”

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.

Also Mughals only succeeded in conquering a huge part of India because of Rajputs like Maan singh (Arguably the greatest general of mughals). Without him the weakened mughals would have slowly gotten crushed by the Afghani tribes and other Northern Indian clans.

 

[unstable]

You forgot the fact they used to gift their daughters to Mughals also by the third generation (?) Mughals were more Rajput than Turkic Mongolic.

it was their situation they repulsed many invaders too and most rajputs didn't do that.

 

[MiserableMan]

in rajasthan a kshatriya group was land owning elites of society.

they used rajanya and kshatriya as their title it is observable all throughout northern india.
rajput title originated in clans of malwa mewar and gujarat invented most probably by local brahmins.

You are only half correct, Rajputs refers to "Son of King" they were warrior clans mostly who become nobility through conquest. The land owning elite came after the conquering, they at their base were warriors not landowners.

 

[zeref74]

it was their situation they repulsed many invaders too and most rajputs didn't do that.

Would the later Mughals still be considered invaders given their predominantly Rajput ancestry ?

 

[vernier]

Why do you think killing women is high t?

 

[unstable]

You are only half correct, Rajputs refers to "Son of King" they were warrior clans mostly who become nobility through conquest. The land owning elite came after the conquering, they at their base were warriors not landowners.

kshatriya and rajanya was the preferred title by kings and his relative but in 7-10th century india became increasingly decentralized so local kings in malwa started adopting these names.

the mewar dynasty has its origin as local feudal land owners who usurped after fall of pratiharas.

i think they started as "feudal lords" not as warriors or farmers.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

i am a veteran observer of maratha rajput online war of course i have seen it

rajputs were fighting ahirs jats and marathas at the same time it was too damn funny

they were quoting snippets from book showing how they cucked each other it was too funny

I find it funny asf tbh. The rajput hate is palpable

 

[MiserableMan]

kshatriya and rajanya was the preferred title by kings and his relative but in 7-10th century india became increasingly decentralized so local kings in malwa started adopting these names.

the mewar dynasty has its origin as local feudal land owners who usurped after fall of pratiharas.

i think they started as "feudal lords" not as warriors or farmers.

The Rajput clans originated around 7th century after the Harsha empires decline, the word rajput refers to ethnic rajasthani clans only. They started as warring tribes and later took over the remenants of the empire and become the elite. They were originally fighters and merceneries not land owners.

 

[unstable]

I find it funny asf tbh. The rajput hate is palpable

rajputs were showing sources how gujjar and ahir girls were in their harems as nautch girls
they were instead calling rajputs mughalputs.

The Rajput clans originated around 7th century after the Harsha empires decline, the word rajput refers to ethnic rajasthani clans only. They started as warring tribes and later took over the remenants of the empire and become the elite. They were originally fighters and merceneries not land owners.

rajput term started in malwa region by local brahmins and was then applied to other fuedal lords.

i disagree with the warrior origin as oldest evidence of kshatriyas they are used as a caste not in sense of warriors.
kshatriya itself means protecter of kshetra (estate).

 

[MiserableMan]

rajputs were showing sources how gujjar and ahir girls were in their harems as nautch girls
they were instead calling rajputs mughalputs.


rajput term started in malwa region by local brahmins and was then applied to other fuedal lords.

i disagree with the warrior origin as oldest evidence of kshatriyas they are used as a caste not in sense of warriors.
kshatriya itself means protecter of kshetra (estate).

Rajputs were warring tribes this is literally a undeniable fact. You are also wrong about the origin of the word "Rajput", it comes from the sanskrit word "Rajputa" meaning "Sons of rulers" used by the ruling class before the term Rajput become more commonly adopted. Their is no evidence that the term was given by Brahmins either, it was used by the previous rules before the Rajput clans rose to power.

 

[unstable]

Rajputs were warring tribes this is literally a undeniable fact. You are also wrong about the origin of the word "Rajput", it comes from the sanskrit word "Rajputa" meaning "Sons of rulers" used by the ruling class before the term Rajput become more commonly adopted. Their is no evidence that the term was given by Brahmins either, it was used by the previous rules before the Rajput clans rose to power.

raja was used for feudal lords in 7-10th century which were the genesis period for rajput identity.

older rajputs were not given the title by brahmins most probably

but later rajput titles were given by brahmins to feudal lords as genealogy and lineage from suryavamsa were important for such a claim.

 

[MiserableMan]

raja was used for feudal lords in 7-10th century which were the genesis period for rajput identity.

older rajputs were not given the title by brahmins most probably

but later rajput titles were given by brahmins to feudal lords as genealogy and lineage from suryavamsa were important for such a claim.

The whole suryavansma shit was Bs, i say this as a Rajput descended myself. Brahmins just made up shit along with Rajputs to try to make there rule seem more divine and ancient some going as far as claiming lineage from Vedic kshatriyas. In truth They were nothing but native tribals who conquered and became nobility.
The genesis for Rajput was "Rajputa" not "Raja", i explained it earlier. Older or younger rajput doesn't matter, they took power through force and then made up bs claims to justify their rule.

 

[unstable]

The whole suryavansma shit was Bs, i say this as a Rajput descended myself. Brahmins just made up shit along with Rajputs to try to make there rule seem more divine and ancient some going as far as claiming lineage from Vedic kshatriyas. In truth They were nothing but native tribals who conquered and became nobility.
The genesis for Rajput was "Rajputa" not "Raja", i explained it earlier. Older or younger rajput doesn't matter, they took power through force and then made up bs claims to justify their rule.

we basically agree rajput were local feudal chiefs who used rajput as their title..

 

[MiserableMan]

we basically agree rajput were local feudal chiefs who used rajput as their title..

Indeed, Rajput although was a wider catagory most used their clans name such as Rathod, Kanwar etc.

 

[idealistsynth]

Even though im technically Dravidian on my father’s dad, I don’t have Dravidian pheno whatsoever. I don’t know what exactly my mom’s side is but supposedly it involves some Iranian merchants.

Thoughts?
@Gengar @Jason Voorhees

 

[unstable]

Indeed, Rajput although was a wider catagory most used their clans name such as Rathod, Kanwar etc.

i think op is a pakistani rajput and is doing sem2sem with rajasthanis them as muh northwestern rajputs.

even muslim rajput in rajasthan won't marry a punjabi rajput kanger

 

[unstable]

Would the later Mughals still be considered invaders given their predominantly Rajput ancestry ?

its more cultural than genealogical, rajputs had resentment towards them and sided with their enemies when they had the chance.
this is the reason why kanishka is liked in india so much that they name their children after a foreign king he was culturally similar to them.

 

[MiserableMan]

its more cultural than genealogical, rajputs had resentment towards them and sided with their enemies when they had the chance.
this is the reason why kanishka is liked in india so much that they name their children after a foreign king he was culturally similar to them.

I mean Kanishk was born in the Indian sub-continent and kushan empire is considered a Indian empire even though it was found in central Asia, so i don't see how that is wrong?

 

[unstable]

I mean Kanishk was born in the Indian sub-continent and kushan empire is considered a Indian empire even though it was found in central Asia, so i don't see how that is wrong?

that is what i am saying it is more cultural than genealogical.

 

[MiserableMan]

that is what i am saying it is more cultural than genealogical.

Agreed, furthermore, kushans mixed heavily with the North Indian population for a few centuries, so some could have claimed to be kushan yeuzhi too. Although in modern times their genes are pretty much gone from the population for some reason.

 

[unstable]

Agreed, furthermore, kushans mixed heavily with the North Indian population for a few centuries, so some could have claimed to be kushan yeuzhi too. Although in modern times their genes are pretty much gone from the population for some reason.

they survived in upper doabs till guptas who fought them as they claimed defeating a shahoshah could be persian or kushan.
gujjars nowadays claim descent from kanishka too.

kushans should have had east asian dna but they didn't spread it into india too muc or their population was too small as indians in plains have next to zero east asian

 

[MiserableMan]

they survived in upper doabs till guptas who fought them as they claimed defeating a shahoshah could be persian or kushan.
gujjars nowadays claim descent from kanishka too.

kushans should have had east asian dna but they didn't spread it into india too muc or their population was too small as indians in plains have next to zero east asian

Kushans weren't chinks, they were a mixture of multiple central Asian ethnic groups. A lot of them had blue eyes and light hair, their is a museum in my city that has bodies and paintings of kushans and from their era.

 

[Gengar]

not high t to kill your own daughter

cause then there’s less women for each man

not high t to make sure your women are burnt if you die

being high t = caring less

no woman is going to be faithful to a man for life, even if the man is extremely good looking, but the rajputs couldn’t internalise this and instead brainwashed their women to jump into pits of fire

this is the very opposite of survival

They clearly didn’t care for survival. That’s why they were never united.

 

[Gengar]

except rajput is not a ethnic group but title bestowed by brahmins onto local landholders
all these are the features of landholding castes some came to be known as rajputs

landholding caste be it jats ahirs rors all have these features

and don't get me started on military prowess of indian brahmins (high steppe gangetic ones)
first group to be considered martial race by britain.

are you rajput
cuz lumping rajasthani and punjabi rajputs as nw ones is sem2sem

maybe

Also, I never said they were one specific ethnic group. That’s why I mentioned all three groups. They vary regionally but even within regions there’s variations.

 

[Gengar]

My gf is a Rajput too

Yeah, you told me the other day. That’s how I found out Haryana Rajputs existed. She is a Northwestern Rajput as well. I found an informative image that shows how different Rajputs cluster.

 

[Gengar]

nigga kashmiri??? no one mogs kashmiris in the subcon
rajputs have high zagros.

Kashmiris are overrated ngl.

 

[Gengar]

It's probably to do with culture and not testosterone.

What about them damn thuggees? Now those were some black hearted bastards if there ever was.

My father bought a book in the 90's called The Art of Death. It dissected thuggee methods of killing people without being seen. One of the ones that stuck out to me depicted walking up to someone behind and grabbing their testicles between their legs. When they instinctively lurch down you use their momentum by lifting on their balls with one hand and pressing down on the back of their head to smash their skull on the ground.

I agree, it’s culture and not testosterone. I’m surprised you know about the original thugs. That’s cool. Their method you described sounds brootal. I wonder which ethnic groups they belonged to.

 

[Gengar]

Wrong, Rajputs were the warrior clans of Rajasthan which become nobility through conquest of the North part of sub-continent. Brahmins were also assimilated by these Rajput clans, some jatts and rors too are considered Rajputs but most are not. They were not bestowed the title by Brahmins.

I have seen these caste feuds, Rors are always respectful to Rajputs and vice versa. Gujjars, Marathas and Jat(t)s on the other hand…

 

[decadouche57]

Even though im technically Dravidian on my father’s dad, I don’t have Dravidian pheno whatsoever. I don’t know what exactly my mom’s side is but supposedly it involves some Iranian merchants.

Thoughts?
@Gengar @Jason Voorhees

You do