I have come to the conclusion that Rajputs are the most high T people in India

Kushans weren't chinks, they were a mixture of multiple central Asian ethnic groups. A lot of them had blue eyes and light hair, their is a museum in my city that has bodies and paintings of kushans and from their era.
not completely but in considerable amount even scythians had east asian dna.

:feelshmm: maybe

Also, I never said they were one specific ethnic group. That’s why I mentioned all three groups. They vary regionally but even within regions there’s variations.
rajasthani rajputs are very different than pakistani rajpoots genetically and phenotypically, nw rajput is not a real thing.
I agree, it’s culture and not testosterone. I’m surprised you know about the original thugs. That’s cool. Their method you described sounds brootal. I wonder which ethnic groups they belonged to.
mostly lower caste people imo, rajput estates were targeted by them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
You forgot the fact they used to gift their daughters to Mughals also by the third generation (?) Mughals were more Rajput than Turkic Mongolic.
Northwestern Rajputs didn’t.

The Sisodia clan of Mewar was an exception as they refused to send their women to the Mughal Harem which resulted in siege and mass suicide at Chittor.

I’m guessing Gangetic Rajputs did.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

  • They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

  • They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

  • They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

  • They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

  • Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.
iam pretty retarded to understand this but iam on youre side😘
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Gengar
There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

  • They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

  • They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

  • They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

  • They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

  • Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.
Yeah like my gay indian teacher.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
it was their situation they repulsed many invaders too and most rajputs didn't do that.
It wasn’t the case for all Rajputs.

The Sisodia clan of Mewar was an exception as they refused to send their women to the Mughal Harem which resulted in siege and mass suicide at Chittor.”

Mewar is in Rajasthan. I’m guessing it was mainly Gangetic Rajputs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Would the later Mughals still be considered invaders given their predominantly Rajput ancestry ?
Only the initial Mughal elite were invaders. Since Babur came from Central Asia. It became South Asian later on.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Even though im technically Dravidian on my father’s dad, I don’t have Dravidian pheno whatsoever. I don’t know what exactly my mom’s side is but supposedly it involves some Iranian merchants.

Thoughts?
@Gengar @Jason Voorhees
Not all Dravidians are dark. But yeah, a chunk of Dravidians have MENA ancestry.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
i think op is a pakistani rajput and is doing sem2sem with rajasthanis them as muh northwestern rajputs.

even muslim rajput in rajasthan won't marry a punjabi rajput kanger:lul:
Punjabi Rajputs and Rajasthani Rajputs are totally different. Just look at the PCA plot I posted earlier.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
The whole suryavansma shit was Bs, i say this as a Rajput descended myself. Brahmins just made up shit along with Rajputs to try to make there rule seem more divine and ancient some going as far as claiming lineage from Vedic kshatriyas. In truth They were nothing but native tribals who conquered and became nobility.
The genesis for Rajput was "Rajputa" not "Raja", i explained it earlier. Older or younger rajput doesn't matter, they took power through force and then made up bs claims to justify their rule.
What are you?
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
It wasn’t the case for all Rajputs.

The Sisodia clan of Mewar was an exception as they refused to send their women to the Mughal Harem which resulted in siege and mass suicide at Chittor.”

Mewar is in Rajasthan. I’m guessing it was mainly Gangetic Rajputs.

nigga its the opposite, sisodia is not the only clan in rajasthan.
gangetic rajputs did not do that
i think jodha bai was from rathore clan and jai singh was from kushwaha clan.
What are you?
he is a himachali pahari rajput
Punjabi Rajputs and Rajasthani Rajputs are totally different. Just look at the PCA plot I posted earlier.
then just use rajasthani rajput, nw makes it seem like sindhis and punjabis are included.
Are khokars jatts or Rajputs? Web says khokar are both
khokhars imo are a different clan all together.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and vernier
Are khokars jatts or Rajputs? Web says khokar are both
Yeah, in Pakistan they will either identify as Rajput or Jatt depending on where you go. I believe that they are a mixed group, so you have Rajputs and Jatts there.
 
  • +1
Reactions: vernier
nigga its the opposite, sisodia is not the only clan in rajasthan.
gangetic rajputs did
i think jodha bai was from rathore clan and jai singh was from kushwaha clan.

he is a himachali pahari rajput

then just use rajasthani rajput, nw makes it seem like sindhis and punjabis are included.

khokhars imo are a different clan all together.
Rajasthani Rajputs have no tradition of giving away wives, so I doubt it.

Oh okay, so he’s a Hill Rajput then. He has some Tibetan admixture compared to other Rajputs.

Gangetic Rajputs have more Steppe and Northwestern Rajputs have more Zagros.

And I used Northwestern Rajputs to keep it simple. There are AJK Rajputs, Haryana Rajputs, Punjabi Rajputs, Pothohari Rajputs, Rajasthani Rajputs and Sindhi Rajputs like you pointed out.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Rajasthani Rajputs have no tradition of giving away wives, so I doubt it.

Oh okay, so he’s a Hill Rajput then. He has some Tibetan admixture compared to other Rajputs.

Gangetic Rajputs have more Steppe and Northwestern Rajputs have more Zagros.

And I used Northwestern Rajputs to keep it simple. There are AJK Rajputs, Haryana Rajputs, Punjabi Rajputs, Pothohari Rajputs, Rajasthani Rajputs and Sindhi Rajputs like you pointed out.
no one has a tradition to give away wives:lul:
gangetics instead have no account of marrying their daughters to outsiders.
himachalis don't have that much tibetan dna

nigga all of them are very different from each other even in gangetic western and easter will be very different.
and rajasthani rajput have higher aasi too and are genetically different from rajpoots.

what clan are you?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
no one has a tradition to give away wives:lul:
gangetics instead have no account of marrying their daughters to outsiders.
himachalis don't have that much tibetan dna

nigga all of them are very different from each other even in gangetic western and easter will be very different.
and rajasthani rajput have higher aasi too and are genetically different from rajpoots.

what clan are you?
That’s false. Not to mention, Rajasthani Rajputs are a minority. There are way more Gangetic Rajputs in comparison. Also, Rajasthani Rajputs have the most Zagros after Baloch do. They reach up to 50+% ZNF on IllustrativeDNA. They also have lower AASI.

As for clans, I’ll tell you in PMs if you tell me about yours. :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
That’s false. Not to mention, Rajasthani Rajputs are a minority. There are way more Gangetic Rajputs in comparison. Also, Rajasthani Rajputs have the most Zagros after Baloch do. They reach up to 50+% ZNF on IllustrativeDNA. They also have lower AASI.

As for clans, I’ll tell you in PMs if you tell me about yours. :Comfy:
they are pretty big in southern rajasthan region
you can have high zagros and high aasi:lul:
rajasthani rajputs are genetically too different to lumped with rajpoots

i am probably the only member of my community to have internet access so i'll get doxxed.
talking about pms you still havent answered mine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
1763656100069
 
There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

  • They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

  • They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

  • They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

  • They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

  • Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.
Sounds like some backwards inbred behaviour. Maybe they started killing their own women to prevent further inbreeding because they couldn't stop jumping on them or something.

The world would have been better for it if British Gigachads exterminated these mongrels.
 
Sounds like some backwards inbred behaviour. Maybe they started killing their own women to prevent further inbreeding because they couldn't stop jumping on them or something.

The world would have been better for it if British Gigachads exterminated these mongrels.
british never ruled them,

also ganga singh (a rajput) represented the british crown for the treaty of versailles
indian jodhpuri rajputs were sent to defeat turks and conquered israel.
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
I have seen these caste feuds, Rors are always respectful to Rajputs and vice versa. Gujjars, Marathas and Jat(t)s on the other hand…
Quite a few jats are also part of rajputs, Marathas are somewhat chill with them too. Gujjars had some issues but mostly minor, internet banter is just some shitskin dalits larping so it doesn't really count.
 
Sounds like some backwards inbred behaviour. Maybe they started killing their own women to prevent further inbreeding because they couldn't stop jumping on them or something.

The world would have been better for it if British Gigachads exterminated these mongrels.
Brits were cucks who lost to a declining maratha empire i twice and had to use punjabis to defeat them.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: unstable
There are three main distinct Rajput groups: Northwestern Rajputs, Gangetic Rajputs and Hill Rajputs. I’m focusing on the Northwestern Rajputs.

  • They halted the Islamic expansion of South Asia and single-handedly fought against these invaders while Brahmins and other dindus hid in their mud huts.

  • They would also fight amongst themselves, never getting along with another. Rajput loyalty was tied to their clan, and not the wider group.

  • They practice(d) sati, which is the act of self-immolation, performed by widows. They believe(d) it’s a woman’s duty to worship her husband and to follow him even in death.

  • They also practiced female infanticide, where they would kill their daughters because they wanted sons.

  • Due to a lack of women from female infanticide, they would enslave other women instead.

The British tried to stop their barbaric practices by punishing them, but ultimately had to reverse these laws because it didn’t stop the Rajputs from killing their own daughters.

Low T dindus tried to do the same by quoting their holy books “to kill one woman is equal to one hundred Brahmins, to kill one child is equal to one hundred women, while to kill one hundred children is an offense too heinous for comparison.

But the high T Hindu Rajputs brootally DNR’d them and continued with what they did.

Nowadays there are a lot of fake Rajputs, even in Pakistan; many are only Rajputs in name but not by blood. It’s the South Asian version of kanging.
I made a thread on this 3 years ago….

I’m glad your finally coming to realise this because I always said rajputs are the descendants of every BVLL that invaded India the Arabs government bases India originally due to the Rajputs piracy on Islamic ships
 
  • +1
Reactions: yussimania
Rajasthani Rajputs have no tradition of giving away wives, so I doubt it.

Oh okay, so he’s a Hill Rajput then. He has some Tibetan admixture compared to other Rajputs.

Gangetic Rajputs have more Steppe and Northwestern Rajputs have more Zagros.

And I used Northwestern Rajputs to keep it simple. There are AJK Rajputs, Haryana Rajputs, Punjabi Rajputs, Pothohari Rajputs, Rajasthani Rajputs and Sindhi Rajputs like you pointed out.
Most Himachalis don't have any tibetan admixture, only a few ethnic groups like kinnuri, khas etc have tibetian ancestry. Others are Indo-Aryans, rajputs mostly don't marry tribals like kinnuris etc. Neither do these tribal communities marry outside their tribes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
proud to have Rajput lineage :feelshah:
 
  • Woah
Reactions: unstable
I made a thread on this 3 years ago….

I’m glad your finally coming to realise this because I always said rajputs are the descendants of every BVLL that invaded India the Arabs government bases India originally due to the Rajputs piracy on Islamic ships

nigga you are confusing sindhis and rajput as most rajput areas didn't have coastline
sindhis under chach pirated arab ships
and rajputs mostly have native dna not invader:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
nigga you are confusing sindhis and rajput as most rajput areas didn't have coastline
sindhis under chach pirated arab ships
and rajputs mostly have native dna not invader:lul:
That’s true tbh it your very similar. Your completely correct I did mix them up but rajputs were better the Sindhis were great pirates but not as good as rajjjjjaaaahhhhaaaa badboys.

Ngl I thought all Pakistanis were Rajputs years ago :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
That’s true tbh it your very similar. Your completely correct I did mix them up but rajputs were better the Sindhis were great pirates but not as good as rajjjjjaaaahhhhaaaa badboys.

Ngl I thought all Pakistanis were Rajputs years ago :forcedsmile::forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
i still don't understand ideology behind muslim rajputs @MiserableMan

rajput is a title used by nobility and is mainly a part of caste system which goes against islam?
unlike other ethnicities like jatt and arain which are tribal identities rajput is a caste.

how do you know about rajputs aren't you west african.
 
I agree, it’s culture and not testosterone. I’m surprised you know about the original thugs. That’s cool. Their method you described sounds brootal. I wonder which ethnic groups they belonged to.
My father was kind of an operator wannabe. He would get enamoured with shit like this. Always bringing weird but interesting books home.
 

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
26
Views
1K
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
thecel
Replies
76
Views
15K
commensale
C

Users who are viewing this thread

  • unstable
Back
Top