i have fuckin 98.3% front harmony why do i look weird

No hard feelings, brother, actually, you’re attractive, but I just want to clarify things. Do you think Chico could ever have 89% harmony? He’s unmoggable, he has perfect features and ratios. I just hate coping.
i scored 95 from the front after review and 86 from the side
 
i am not coping , i am just pointing out how harmony isn't really quantifiable lol

just based on looks what do you estimate my harmony to be
and what do you estimate chicos
Not you cope ,in generale and such
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Not you cope ,in generale and such
but how high does my harmony look

and how high does his look despite what measurements they are actually
 
chico has high averageness and perfect other things
Exactly, bro. Since harmony truly means beauty, we can’t just base it on some ideal ratios or anything like that. The bigger picture needs to be considered. And again, you’re really attractive, but I’m just defending reality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
but how high does my harmony look

and how high does his look despite what measurements they are actually
I don’t want to get into these technical terms, but you really don’t have anything wrong with you (let’s put it that way).
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
I don’t want to get into these technical terms, but you really don’t have anything wrong with you (let’s put it that way).
i understand i won't be offended but how well do you think my face harmonises - not about ideal ratios but how well they go together
 
i understand i won't be offended but how well do you think my face harmonises - not about ideal ratios but how well they go together
80+
Only in terms like (nothing seems huge off )
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
80+
Only in terms like (nothing seems huge off )
nice, thanks


harmony might be measureable in the future with 3d scans or whatever i estimate that the ratios that we don't know about mine would be off

like lip height to lower third - who knows
 
nice, thanks


harmony might be measureable in the future with 3d scans or whatever i estimate that the ratios that we don't know about mine would be off

like lip height to lower third - who knows
Harmony should be measured based on everything: features, definition, projection, coloring, symmetry, averageness, hair density (eyelashes, eyebrows), and health indicators.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Harmony should be measured based on everything: features, definition, projection, coloring, symmetry, averageness, hair density (eyelashes, eyebrows), and health indicators.
where am I lacking the most?
 
where am I lacking the most?
I’m not great at analyzing this, I just know the basics, of course. Anyway, good brows, but they lack tilt, same goes for the eyes.
 
98%harmony(you look good tho)
View attachment 3630171
89%harmony
View attachment 3630172
This forum should be destroyed, measuring harmony without considering the features themselves, definition, proportion, colors, etc… How many idiots are here. Not even Matt Bomer has a 97% harmony, it’s all nonsense, “creating attractive” cope so hard.
@NoaA99
@lestoa
@grungymallard97
Who exactly does that?
No one’s ignoring those factors- but harmony stands apart from most of the categories you mentioned and is arguably the most important.

Proportions, in fact, are a core part of facial harmony. So, what’s your point?

This guy looks great- definitely in the Chad category, especially after some further maturation.
I really don’t get, how some jealous idiots label this as HTN??
Maybe, if they stepped outside this bubble, they’d realize just how far this is from the average man/ boy his age.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
yeah agreed but creating attractive measured chico and matt bomer aswell but generally if you score high on creating attractive you will look good

also chico has high angularity , high dimorphism and perfect features
Chico high ang and dimo? What r u smoking my boy
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
98%harmony(you look good tho)
View attachment 3630171
89%harmony
View attachment 3630172
This forum should be destroyed, measuring harmony without considering the features themselves, definition, proportion, colors, etc… How many idiots are here. Not even Matt Bomer has a 97% harmony, it’s all nonsense, “creating attractive” cope so hard.
@NoaA99
@lestoa
@grungymallard97
Bud that pic is the least obvious Morph I’ve ever seen
 
🤣. Wtf do u even know what dimo is
yes I do - i measured his dimorphism myself - the only part where he didn't do well is his FWHR and eyebrow setting

dimorphism isn't just masculinity
 
yes I do - i measured his dimorphism myself - the only part where he didn't do well is his FWHR and eyebrow setting

dimorphism isn't just masculinity
listen im sorry but stop with the ego feeding your not close to 100% harmony in ur candids and motion like cmon bruh
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
listen im sorry but stop with the ego feeding your not close to 100% harmony in ur candids and motion like cmon bruh
im not trying to feed my ego i am just pointing out that harmony isn't quantifiable lol

creating attractives scale is dumb and it just measures ratios

but on creating attractives scale that is used for ppl like matt bomer aswell - yes i scored 100% and i can prove that i did

but i assume my actual harmony is like 70-90%
 
Who exactly does that?
No one’s ignoring those factors- but harmony stands apart from most of the categories you mentioned and is arguably the most important.

Proportions, in fact, are a core part of facial harmony. So, what’s your point?

This guy looks great- definitely in the Chad category, especially after some further maturation.
I really don’t get, how some jealous idiots label this as HTN??
Maybe, if they stepped outside this bubble, they’d realize just how far this is from the average man/ boy his age.
As I sayy it’s really attractive but far from 98% harmony,read all my replies.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
Who exactly does that?
No one’s ignoring those factors- but harmony stands apart from most of the categories you mentioned and is arguably the most important.

Proportions, in fact, are a core part of facial harmony. So, what’s your point?

This guy looks great- definitely in the Chad category, especially after some further maturation.
I really don’t get, how some jealous idiots label this as HTN??
Maybe, if they stepped outside this bubble, they’d realize just how far this is from the average man/ boy his age.
damn thanks bro
 
As I sayy it’s really attractive but far from 98% harmony,read all my replies.
yes , it isn't quantifiable but ratios is a part of it

i disagree with the guy saying i am chad but i think i am a bit above avg
 
yes , it isn't quantifiable but ratios is a part of it

i disagree with the guy saying i am chad but i think i am a bit above avg
True in fact you’re attractive for ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
u mog bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
are u just an autist?
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax
i have perfect ratios but that doesn't mean 100% harmony basically
You have ratios in the ideal range ,not really the most optimized.
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax

Attachments

  • IMG_2764.jpeg
    IMG_2764.jpeg
    468 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG_2576.jpeg
    IMG_2576.jpeg
    593.6 KB · Views: 0
Idk about this retard scale ,but you’re on the attractive category,and that’s is all metters .
5 is 1/2
6 is 1/5
7 is 1/100
8 is like 1/4000
9 is one in millions
 
its not my proportions but just something about me looks funny and i can't figure out what it is , i think its cuz i look really young and bloated
no you arent
 
  • +1
Reactions: maxlooksmax

Similar threads

fashioncel
Replies
15
Views
197
Alias!
Alias!
RealFunkyFlamingo
Replies
5
Views
183
ClearEmOut
ClearEmOut
davidlaidisme67
Replies
7
Views
101
hypernormie
hypernormie
got.daim
Replies
19
Views
420
XxeroxX-_-XxeroxX
XxeroxX-_-XxeroxX

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Kazey
Back
Top