I just mesured my bizygo and face height (nasion to top of the upper lip) and I get a fwhr of 2...wtf did I do wrong I do not have a wide face. Pics

[Panzram]

@thecel you know this shit bhai help me out

You can see the calipers, they are accurate and you can see the mesurments. 140mm/70mm is 2. I have a narrow looking face so how is this possible? I located my nasion (yes I know how to do that) and marked it. What is wrong here?

 

[Panzram]

@MouthBreathingElite

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

autistic retard

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

30 yo subhuman

 

[Panzram]

autistic retard

30 yo subhuman

and? your point?

 

[iblamemano]

If your bizyg is actually 2× your fwh, then either your marking points are off or you’re measuring soft tissue, not bone. Narrow looking face can be from low zygomatic projection, low masseter bulk, or longer vertical ratio width alone doesn’t equal ‘wide’

 

[TheAncientMacedonia]

and? your point?

wtf u doing
looks dont matter u dont even have a job

 

[Panzram]

If your bizyg is actually 2× your fwh, then either your marking points are off or you’re measuring soft tissue, not bone. Narrow looking face can be from low zygomatic projection, low masseter bulk, or longer vertical ratio width alone doesn’t equal ‘wide’

I am pressing the calipers against my cheekbone hard, you can see that in the photos. What I am more conflicted about is did I mesure the height right, or is this what they use in the studies. Google gives me this.

 

[iblamemano]

breh idk

 

[Panzram]

The answer is that the average male fwhr is higher than I thought. I believed 2 is some very high fwhr when it is about average in many parts of the world. For Europe it seems to be about 1.9. Dont ask for source I cant be bothered now. I am tired of this shit and need sleep.