I just saw an old picture of my mom and she was still ugly

TACOCEL_

TACOCEL_

Spic= Spanish Person In Charge
Joined
Aug 11, 2025
Posts
2,269
Reputation
2,677
What the fuck was my dad thinking??

no wonder i look this bad:feelswhy:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: unon, iblamexyz, saafiir fan and 5 others
@greycel
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, iblamexyz, BigBallsLarry and 1 other person
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: unon, iblamexyz, liberiangrimreaper and 2 others
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: unon, iblamexyz, d0wnpour_ and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: unon, iblamexyz and Eltrē
Respect your mother @TACOCEL_
What's done is done, don't bother contemplating what ifs
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, Noesis, iblamexyz and 1 other person
So fucking true
wont happen as long as we have htn begging to get into the pants of legitimate foids whos looksmatches have over 10k posts on looksmax.org
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon
how can you say that?
its your own mother?
she carried you for 9 months
and then took care of you and have given you all of what you need growing up until now?
and you go on an incel forum to say straight up my mom is ugly :feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, 🌏Enjoying_ths_life🌲, Noesis and 1 other person
absolute disgusts me
Sad Dissapointed GIF by STRAPPED!
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, 🌏Enjoying_ths_life🌲 and greycel
wont happen as long as we have htn begging to get into the pants of legitimate foids whos looksmatches have over 10k posts on looksmax.org
But they won't procreate
Unlike in the past, now relationships are more dependent on looks than monetary worth/ status in society (job)/ etc

In the past where people didn't seek somebody largely due to their looks, and where relationships meant something, children created from these couples would have more variance

Nowadays everybody has fallen to lust and vanity. Children's looks are going to have hard divisions
Very good looking only go for very good looking, and so on..

Good looking guys may have relationships with many girls but they aren't knocking them up
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon
But they won't procreate
Unlike in the past, now relationships are more dependent on looks than monetary worth/ status in society (job)/ etc

In the past where people didn't seek somebody largely due to their looks, and where relationships meant something, children created from these couples would have more variance

Nowadays everybody has fallen to lust and vanity. Children's looks are going to have hard divisions
Very good looking only go for very good looking, and so on..

Good looking guys may have relationships with many girls but they aren't knocking them up
really? i dont know i feel like the majority of guys are bluepilled cucks who cant tell an attractive foid from frauded mtb with 5 pounds of makeup.

seriously, plus as men age our smv goes down, women smv is always infinite, we are just fucked without true patriarchy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: unon and greycel
You're 100% right as always
it's not even about being right
It's being a human and this is litereally
IN NATURE :lul:
Our mother is core to our life
Mother in nature is core to every animals life
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, Noesis and LosPollosTV
it's not even about being right
It's being a human and this is litereally
IN NATURE :lul:
Our mother is core to our life
Mother in nature is core to every animals life
this is true but we can still be objective? if ur ugly its because of ur parents?
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon
really? i dont know i feel like the majority of guys are bluepilled cucks who cant tell an attractive foid from frauded mtb with 5 pounds of makeup.

seriously, plus as men age our smv goes down, women smv is always infinite, we are just fucked without true patriarchy
You're right about initial part, but perception of good genes for looks correlates highly with good genes for looks
I don't think makeup has changed that. Guys just have lower requirements because of hypergamy

For 2nd paragraph, women's SMV goes down as they are reliant on looks. The distribution of a man's value changes as he gets older. Men aren't only supposed to look good, but be physically competent (be able to protect) + have money (be able to provide) + become smart/learned (be able to lead)

So his value displaces to other factors if he has the capacity to
Ceiling for SMV is much much higher, and lowers but much slowly in contrast to women
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon and iblamexyz
how can you say that?
its your own mother?
she carried you for 9 months
and then took care of you and have given you all of what you need growing up until now?
and you go on an incel forum to say straight up my mom is ugly :feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat:
Wtf this trips me out :feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat::feelswhat:
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon, Deleted member 74902 and iblamexyz
You're right about initial part, but perception of good genes for looks correlates highly with good genes for looks
I don't think makeup has changed that. Guys just have lower requirements because of hypergamy

For 2nd paragraph, women's SMV goes down as they are reliant on looks. The distribution of a man's value changes as he gets older. Men aren't only supposed to look good, but be physically competent (be able to protect) + have money (be able to provide) + become smart/learned (be able to lead)

So his value displaces to other factors if he has the capacity to
Ceiling for SMV is much much higher, and lowers but much slowly in contrast to women
idk man, you can do a single mom experiment on tinder rn and see the amount of matches u get within hours, u mean to tell me not a single one of those matches she could get a LTR? i dont think a womens smv is even reliant on her looks unless you fall on the extreme ends of the distribution.

and yea these masculine traits are nice, but they all have a correlative factor of like .5 with good looking dimorphic men, on top of that, i think we should ask if why we think these traits are important for women if
a) because we know these traits independently attract women
b) the traits happen to be correlative with attractive men who happen to attract women

andrew tate said it himself and i agree with him, the lambo only amplifies who you are as a person, it doesnt change u.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unon and iblamexyz

Similar threads

Softmax09
Replies
0
Views
20
Softmax09
Softmax09
Jason Voorhees
Replies
79
Views
517
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
gandylite.
Discussion my old ass mom
Replies
10
Views
77
IDontBlameAnybody
IDontBlameAnybody
cyrux234
Replies
0
Views
20
cyrux234
cyrux234
bbastardd
Replies
8
Views
88
Lefty Rankin
Lefty Rankin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top