I love capitalism

D

Deleted member 6128

Pruhtty Women 🫶
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Posts
18,043
Reputation
28,125
I've learned more about socialism and it's unironically dogshit it's biggest flaw is that it doesn't realize some people cannot be helped and others should not be helped. I also do not agree with high taxes in general but I can agree with the fact that rich people shouldn't have the ability to become stateless i.e have the power to not be held down by a government.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: schizo echochamber, Deleted member 20399, Joe Rogancel and 13 others
@Lord-Arthur_17
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lord-Arthur_17
I've learned more about socialism and it's unironically dogshit it's biggest flaw is that it doesn't realize some people cannot be helped and others should not be helped. I also do not agree with high taxes in general but I can agree with the fact that rich people shouldn't have the ability to become stateless i.e have the power to not be held down by a government.
I'm a fan of neither.
 
  • +1
Reactions: subswork and poopoohead
Wish I could just live on a farm and be self sufficient and have a family at an early age just like my grandparents parents did.
 
  • +1
Reactions: schizo echochamber, subswork, poopoohead and 2 others
I've learned more about socialism and it's unironically dogshit it's biggest flaw is that it doesn't realize some people cannot be helped and others should not be helped. I also do not agree with high taxes in general but I can agree with the fact that rich people shouldn't have the ability to become stateless i.e have the power to not be held down by a government.
Empathy will be the only thing you'll have left in a few decades, so use it wisely. But yeah, not all people can be helped. Follow your intuition, don't get taken advantage of but be kind to those who really care for you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and Deleted member 6128
National Socialism mogs
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • WTF
Reactions: schizo echochamber, Joe Rogancel, The Thinker and 5 others
We need redistribution of wealth.
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Joe Rogancel, Deleted member 28904 and Deleted member 6128
system doesn't matter. what matters is your genes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Skywalker
capitalism is why this shit forum exists + incels. we're all schizo because we eat processed foods, inhale terrible pollution, and the average person has almost no social life now. I want to move to a latin country and escape western industrial fucking hell hole. If you like capitalism and you're not top 1% wealth, you're a cuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1, Deleted member 6128, Joe Rogancel and 14 others
the only true measure of value is scarcity which means that no matter what we will never reach a point where everyone can be equal. economic laws are invariant that ironically make it impossible for society to ever be just
 
Fuck (((Capitalism))) , it's a Kike creation
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 5815, Skywalker and 2 others
I've learned more about socialism and it's unironically dogshit it's biggest flaw is that it doesn't realize some people cannot be helped and others should not be helped. I also do not agree with high taxes in general but I can agree with the fact that rich people shouldn't have the ability to become stateless i.e have the power to not be held down by a government.
Cope
 
system doesn't matter. what matters is your genes.
capitalism allows people with shit social skills or who don't appeal to normies to get ahead. in socialism it's normie mob rule. it would be fucking awful.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: schizo echochamber, Deleted member 26859, Skywalker and 2 others
People who are considered unremarkable often find themselves drawn to ideologies such as socialism, communism, and Marxism.
This attraction can be attributed, in large part, to their profound insecurity about their own abilities. Their disdain for capitalism stems from the fact that it rewards individuals who demonstrate exceptional talent and allows them to utilize their skills to climb the socioeconomic ladder, thereby contributing to the advancement of society. Consequently, these individuals yearn for a society that suppresses exceptional individuals, as it helps alleviate their own feelings of inferiority.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: schizo echochamber, ThomasJefferson, Skywalker and 6 others
People who are considered unremarkable often find themselves drawn to ideologies such as socialism, communism, and Marxism.
This attraction can be attributed, in large part, to their profound insecurity about their own abilities. Their disdain for capitalism stems from the fact that it rewards individuals who demonstrate exceptional talent and allows them to utilize their skills to climb the socioeconomic ladder, thereby contributing to the advancement of society. Consequently, these individuals yearn for a society that suppresses exceptional individuals, as it helps alleviate their own feelings of inferiority.
Nope, its about empathy and conscientiousness. Most people drawn to egalitarian ideologies dont want to see people starving or freezing to death.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1, alriodai and Lord-Arthur_17
My country was rich and a super power under communism and it became a shithole under capitalism.

That’s all I need to know.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1
I've learned more about socialism...
I also do not agree with high taxes
You show that you don't understand the definition of socialism. High taxes can coexist with private property, BUT THIS IS NOT SOCIALISM! In the same way, nationalization is not yet socialism, but state capitalism - the state replaces the role of the capitalists.

Socialism is the socialization of companies, turning them into cooperatives.

I can agree with the fact that rich people shouldn't have the ability to become stateless i.e have the power to not be held down by a government.
And what does it change? Your opinion won't change the fact that they will bribe politicians if they want to.

capitalism allows people with shit social skills or who don't appeal to normies to get ahead.
So you're suggesting that betabuxxing is the solution?

Wish I could just live on a farm and be self sufficient and have a family at an early age just like my grandparents parents did.
Good luck!
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: alriodai, Deleted member 28904 and Deleted member 27857
So you're suggesting that betabuxxing is the solution?
Better than state mandated betabuxxing. And at least it allows clever individuals to escape the grind.

I'm not saying America is the best or perfect instantiation of it. I'm not a libertarian.
 
Last edited:
Better than state mandated betabuxxing.
But where am I talking about state-mandated wives? I'm not a fan of the state either, just like I'm not a fan of corporations.

And at least it allows clever individuals to escape the grind.
Does this mean that we should throw the rest of the population at the mercy of oligarchs ready to send them to next wars and crises?
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
Does this mean that we should throw the rest of the population at the mercy of oligarchs ready to send them to next wars and crises?

Like I said, I'm not saying America is the perfect instantiation of capitalism, and I'm not dogmatic about pure capitalism. What do you suggest as an alternative?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 28904
Like I said, I'm not saying America is the perfect instantiation of capitalism, and I'm not dogmatic about pure capitalism. What do you suggest as an alternative?
I advocate for a society based on voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and decentralized decision-making. Instead of relying on centralized authority, power would be dispersed among local communities and individuals. Economic activities would be organized through worker cooperatives and community-owned enterprises, ensuring that the benefits are shared among all participants. This model promotes individual freedoms while emphasizing social and economic equality, aiming to create a society that prioritizes human well-being over profit-driven motives.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, alriodai and Deleted member 28904
Like I said, I'm not saying America is the perfect instantiation of capitalism, and I'm not dogmatic about pure capitalism. What do you suggest as an alternative?
Lol if you want to live in a soyciety in general, way more chill to just live in the countryside and have a farm or something, no reason to "progress" soyciety forward.
 
You show that you don't understand the definition of socialism. High taxes can coexist with private property, BUT THIS IS NOT SOCIALISM! In the same way, nationalization is not yet socialism, but state capitalism - the state replaces the role of the capitalists.

Socialism is the socialization of companies, turning them into cooperatives.


And what does it change? Your opinion won't change the fact that they will bribe politicians if they want to.


So you're suggesting that betabuxxing is the solution?


Good luck!
No country has a free market so no country is actually capitalist socialists pick and choose what socialism is and capitalism is.
 
muh soviet union

it was a totalitarian state
You need an authoritarian state to transition into communism.

Unfortunately with the soviet union Lenin died early.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
muh soviet union

it was a totalitarian state
You need totalitarian regimes to enforce communism and socialism
Joe Biden Reaction GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
You need an authoritarian state to transition into communism.

Unfortunately with the soviet union Lenin died early.
You need totalitarian regimes to enforce communism and socialism
Joe Biden Reaction GIF
my point is that u cant argue that communism sucks as an ideology because it hasnt been properly anywhere at any time
 
my point is that u cant argue that communism sucks as an ideology because it hasnt been properly anywhere at any time
Because it is a utopic dream.It would only work if everyone was a goody two shoes NPC.It would only work unironically if there was hypertotalitarian regime like Oceania in 1984.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128
Because it is a utopic dream.It would only work if everyone was a goody two shoes NPC.It would only work unironically if there was hypertotalitarian regime like Oceania in 1984.
Ironic because that essentially what Marx describes if I'm not wrong he states constant propaganda needs to be created to convince people they are still fighting capitalism and capitalists even after communism has been achieved
 
Ironic because that essentially what Marx describes if I'm not wrong he states constant propaganda needs to be created to convince people they are still fighting capitalism and capitalists even after communism has been achieved
Ironic since he was a part of the bourgeosie he hated so much.He also hated the jews a lot even though he was technically a jew(his father converted to christianity if i am not mistaken)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128
Because it is a utopic dream.It would only work if everyone was a goody two shoes NPC.It would only work unironically if there was hypertotalitarian regime like Oceania in 1984.
it will work once theres enough automation, imagine 50% of jobs replaced by AI
 
it will work once theres enough automation, imagine 50% of jobs replaced by AI
AI is overrated and would be more expensive than some random chinese guy
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 15468
No country has a free market so no country is actually capitalist socialists pick and choose what socialism is and capitalism is.
What is the free market for you? Define it first. Also, I'm wondering if you'd really want that... for abortion clinics or gay bars to exist - you need state intervention to do something about it. Intervention, so the market would not be free but regulated - not to mention that the very existence of the state requires taxes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
What is the free market for you? Define it first. Also, I'm wondering if you'd really want that... for abortion clinics or gay bars to exist - you need state intervention to do something about it. Intervention, so the market would not be free but regulated - not to mention that the very existence of the state requires taxes.
A free market = no state intervention
 
A free market = no state intervention
Doesn't the very existence of taxes undermine our freedom? If the free market is the absence of state intervention... then there can be no free market as long as the state exists.
 
  • +1
Reactions: alriodai
Doesn't the very existence of taxes undermine our freedom? If the free market is the absence of state intervention... then there can be no free market as long as the state exists.
Depends on what those taxes are used on if it benefits me without me knowing the no it doesn't undermine my freedom. But I do think a flat tax rate across the entire populous is a bit dumb individuals should be able to choose what they're tax goes to and how much they pay.
 
all people who love socialism and communism - residents of countries in which he was or retarded broke LGBT+ student
Nobody who lived in countries with socialism and moved to normal countries love it.

High taxes prevent you from becoming rich. And the only successful countries with socialism are Sweden, where 90% of millionaires inherited their wealth and Norway, where 50k per person per year from oil production
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: alriodai
People who are considered unremarkable often find themselves drawn to ideologies such as socialism, communism, and Marxism.
This attraction can be attributed, in large part, to their profound insecurity about their own abilities. Their disdain for capitalism stems from the fact that it rewards individuals who demonstrate exceptional talent and allows them to utilize their skills to climb the socioeconomic ladder, thereby contributing to the advancement of society. Consequently, these individuals yearn for a society that suppresses exceptional individuals, as it helps alleviate their own feelings of inferiority.
Rofl, if this is satirical, it's hilarious

Capitalism has little to do with exceptional talent and everything to do with luck and a proclivity for exploitation.

Don't confuse it for meritocracy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1, Deleted member 6128 and alriodai
I want to move to a latin country and escape western industrial fucking hell hole.
Latin countries it’s just poor capitalism countries
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: raminzer
all people who love socialism and communism - residents of countries in which he was or retarded broke LGBT+ student
Nobody who lived in countries with socialism and moved to normal countries love it.

High taxes prevent you from becoming rich. And the only successful countries with socialism are Sweden, where 90% of millionaires inherited their wealth and Norway, where 50k per person per year from oil production
Do you know why this discussion is pointless? Again and again I notice the same pattern: repeating previously refuted nonsense. Such nonsense is, for example, calling Sweden a socialist country. While it is a social democratic country (high tax capitalism, welfare state).

Another nonsense is the suggestion that countries where the state has replaced the capitalists are socialist. Consider whether, for example, in Venezuela, employees actually own companies. Just because some demagogues say they govern on behalf of the workers will not make the workers actually have power in their hands.

The quintessence of socialism is not social benefits, but putting enterprises under the power of workers (making them cooperatives)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128 and alriodai
Lol if you want to live in a soyciety in general, way more chill to just live in the countryside and have a farm or something, no reason to "progress" soyciety forward.
Yeah, I agree, if you're talking about fantasy utopia. In reality your wife would probably die in childbirth, most of your children in infancy, and then you and the rest of them would be murdered by marauders or foreign invaders. If you're talking about now, yeah sure, there's room for a tiny percent of people to escape, but you owe that opportunity to capitalism. It's like that dumb fucking "radical self sufficiency" Burning Man shit. Like, they take a bunch of shit capitalism made, or that they made in advance because of the free time that capitalism afforded them, then they go out into the desert and LARP as though they're doing it without capitalism.
 
Do you know why this discussion is pointless? Again and again I notice the same pattern: repeating previously refuted nonsense. Such nonsense is, for example, calling Sweden a socialist country. While it is a social democratic country (high tax capitalism, welfare state).

the fact of the matter is that any socialist country simply hides behind this word. because real socialism and communism is a utopia.
Current socialists simply want to make the scales at the same level, so that later these bowls will be outweighed in the direction of the socialists. Literally a typical struggle for power, characteristic of modern capitalist society.

Another nonsense is the suggestion that countries where the state has replaced the capitalists are socialist. Consider whether, for example, in Venezuela, employees actually own companies. Just because some demagogues say they govern on behalf of the workers will not make the workers actually have power in their hands.

The quintessence of socialism is not social benefits, but putting enterprises under the power of workers (making them cooperatives)

it's a bad idea to put power in the hands of the workers. the worthy should govern. and I'm not going to argue further if you are not writing this from another poor socialist country

it is ridiculous to cite as an example a country in which money was only because of oil, and not because of their knowledge and technology.
 
if the government has a monopoly on violence it’s not true capitalism. True capitalism can only be stateless where corporations form armies and fight each other for land and resources, anything less than this is faggot rich boy Ayn Rand reading sheltered cuck fantasy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Joe Rogancel
Yeah, I agree, if you're talking about fantasy utopia. In reality your wife would probably die in childbirth, most of your children in infancy, and then you and the rest of them would be murdered by marauders or foreign invaders. If you're talking about now, yeah sure, there's room for a tiny percent of people to escape, but you owe that opportunity to capitalism. It's like that dumb fucking "radical self sufficiency" Burning Man shit. Like, they take a bunch of shit capitalism made, or that they made in advance because of the free time that capitalism afforded them, then they go out into the desert and LARP as though they're doing it without capitalism.
Lol if you believe that jew stuff
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top