Raja Porus
Maya
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2025
- Posts
- 1,957
- Reputation
- 3,242
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Communist China is the current socialist superpower.
Its called China

No it's not. Millenial home ownership is higher in China than in America. They're only allowed to work 44 hrs a week there. That 996 is just a tech industry loophole that they'll eventually crack down on and most Americans work multiple jobs 40-80 hours a week anyways. In America, there's no limit to how many hours you can work meaning a company can force you to work 168 hours a week, 24/7 if they wanted to.China is a capitalist dystopia![]()
It does work. Socialism turned Russia from a backwater underdeveloped shithole to superpower within a decadeNice anthem but socialism in general doesn't work unfortunately
I was always a socialist. I will die as a socialistNigga is changing his political ideologies like a bouncing DVD logo screensaver.
russia became an underdeveloped shithole because of the civil war caused by the Bolshevik piece of shitIt does work. Socialism turned Russia from a backwater underdeveloped shithole to superpower within a decade
Ussr was anti religious nigger
Wow, actually the opposite.russia became an underdeveloped shithole because of the civil war caused by the Bolshevik piece of shit
it was the USSR an underdeveloped shithole, so that's why it collapsed, due to it dogshit economy.Wow, actually the opposite.
The only reason russia became a "superpower" is because of its massive population and land area, also the fact europe relied on russia because it was starving without the bread from ukraine and russiaIt does work. Socialism turned Russia from a backwater underdeveloped shithole to superpower within a decade
you do know that nazism was a form of socialism, right? this bothers socialists a great deal. The only real difference between nazism and marxism was the fact nazism was anti-internationalism, it was focused on socializing the race, while marxism is all about socializing the society as a wholeSocialism defeated Nazism
Political shit doesn't ruin countries if economy is good enough. Look at belgium, its split it half in terms of ethnicities, yet it holds together because of their economyUSSR fell apart due to political dissolution, not due to economic problems
It won't happen by itself, economically speaking. Maybe if you plan a revolution but you saw how the red revolution ruined russia, slaughtered it's elite, commited genocide over ukrainians etcSocialism is quite literally the limit point of capitalism. It is inevitable
Again, this is an apocalypse cope imo. It isn't realisticSlavery, feudalism & mercantilism were once the dominant modes of economic production, like capitalism now. But just as they went away or diminished, the same will happen with capitalism. It will be replaced by socialism
We can discuss this forever but its simply not realistic, we are not all the same and not worth the same, its less effective. In utopia, it could work, but we'd all have to be equally beautiful, strong, healthy, intelligent etc before implementing that utopia.
The only reason russia became a "superpower" is because of its massive population and land area, also the fact europe relied on russia because it was starving without the bread from ukraine and russia
you do know that nazism was a form of socialism, right? this bothers socialists a great deal. The only real difference between nazism and marxism was the fact nazism was anti-internationalism, it was focused on socializing the race, while marxism is all about socializing the society as a whole
This is a 5 hour long video, it goes in great detail, I watched it in its entirety
Political shit doesn't ruin countries if economy is good enough. Look at belgium, its split it half in terms of ethnicities, yet it hold togethet because of their economy
It won't happen by itself, economically speaking. Maybe if you plan a revolution but you saw how the red revolution ruined russia, slaughtered it's elite, commited genocide over ukrainians etc
Again, this is an apocalypse cope imo. It isn't realistic
Russian empire was also faaaaaar behind any civilized european country, but at least they were ruled by nobility. By slaughtering all the doctors, generals, aka. the elite, USSR made everyone more "equal", but worse on average.russian empire was better
The same USSR that went to space first?it was the USSR an underdeveloped shithole, so that's why it collapsed, due to it dogshit economy.
there was no genocide in ukrainecommited genocide over ukrainians
I wonder what type of spirituality...
It was a coup. Coups can absolutely topple countries. 72% wanted the USSR to stay.Political shit doesn't ruin countries if economy is good enough. Look at belgium, its split it half in terms of ethnicities, yet it hold togethet because of their economy
Fascism is apart of capitalism, using the ruling class to crush the revolution of the working class.you do know that nazism was a form of socialism, right? this bothers socialists a great deal. The only real difference between nazism and marxism was the fact nazism was anti-internationalism, it was focused on socializing the race, while marxism is all about socializing the society as a whol
It was behind compared to Western Europe only in terms of the fact that the economy had a large agricultural sector, and this does not negate its achievements in other areasRussian empire was also faaaaaar behind any civilized european country, but at least they were ruled by nobility. By slaughtering all the doctors, generals, aka. the elite, USSR made everyone more "equal", but worse on average.
Then why wasn't it a superpower before? Why was there ever a need for revolution? Huh??The only reason russia became a "superpower" is because of its massive population and land area, also the fact europe relied on russia because it was starving without the bread from ukraine and russia
False. USSR had some of the greatest scientists & generalsRussian empire was also faaaaaar behind any civilized european country, but at least they were ruled by nobility. By slaughtering all the doctors, generals, aka. the elite, USSR made everyone more "equal", but worse on average.
yes, they created their own nuclear bomb and launched people into space, ordinary people still lived terribly. In civilian industries, technology was terribly backward, the planned economy was ineffective in producing consumer goods and providing a high standard of livingThe same USSR that went to space first?
And the same Russian Federation that saw declines in population and increases in poverty under Yeltsin?
Give me a break.
Consumerism is a retarded capitalist ideologyyes, they created their own nuclear bomb and launched people into space, ordinary people still lived terribly. In civilian industries, technology was terribly backward, the planned economy was ineffective in producing consumer goods and providing a high standard of living
Fascism and nazism aren't the same. Hitler wanted a classless society for the germans... yeah its racist because he didn't plan to include slavs and others but its still socialism, just not internationalismFascism is apart of capitalism, using the ruling class to crush the revolution of the working class.
Ofc 72% wanted ussr to stay when the russians made up the majority of population jfl... had they done that study in the baltics and ukraine you'd have different resultsIt was a coup. Coups can absolutely topple countries. 72% wanted the USSR to stay.
In what regard was it a superpower later? It had numbers, only that. The average russian lived way worse than an average american, the fact russia got first to space and made more nukes doesn't change thatThen why wasn't it a superpower before? Why was there ever a need for revolution? Huh??
the russian empire was one of the great powers, but not a superpower because of authoritarianism, it slowed down development, modernization and all that. the late ussr was not a superpower eitherThen why wasn't it a superpower before? Why was there ever a need for revolution? Huh??
No, they produced a shitload of heavy industry and military equipment, but few consumer goods. Due to the lack of a market system, there was no competition, i.e., no development.Consumerism is a retarded capitalist ideology
USSR didn't produce more than which was neccesary
Consumer goods? Who tf needs McDonald's and Little Caesar's on every corner? They have their raw kefir and that's all they need. In Soviet bloc Romania they spent at most 3% of their income on apartments that look like houses in America.yes, they created their own nuclear bomb and launched people into space, ordinary people still lived terribly. In civilian industries, technology was terribly backward, the planned economy was ineffective in producing consumer goods and providing a high standard of living
I wonder what type of spirituality...
View attachment 3548263View attachment 3548264
;Balthazar was, on the same night, killed by his slaves; https://www.romanovs.eu/murder-room-inscriptions
Consumer goods? Who tf needs McDonald's and Little Caesar's on every corner? They have their raw kefir and that's all they need. In Soviet bloc Romania they spent at most 3% of their income on apartments that look like houses in America.
A sort of primitive communism based off hunter gatherer society tribalismFascism and nazism aren't the same. Hitler wanted a classless society for the germans... yeah its racist because he didn't plan to include slavs and others but its still socialism, just not internationalism
I mean, if you have a population of 300+ million people, you will have quite a few scientists and intellectuals... even medieval Mongolia, which you probably wouldn't consider as the most advanced country in the world, produced Genghis Khan which conquered half of euro-asiaIt was behind compared to Western Europe only in terms of the fact that the economy had a large agricultural sector, and this does not negate its achievements in other areas
Your government doesn't want you to see the truth. I can watch this video in America. It's a tour of a Romanian apartment during the Warsaw Pact.
The scientific advancement from the Tsardom to the Soviet era was immense. Even such that the current Federation is coasting off the successes of the Stalinist eraI mean, if you have a population of 300+ million people, you will have quite a few scientists and intellectuals... even medieval Mongolia, which you probably wouldn't consider as the most advanced country in the world, produced Genghis Khan which conquered half of euro-asia
But for the most part, an average USSR citizen was just looking for a way to afford his daily bread. Not to mention, the fact these genetically gifted people, athletes, intellectuals etc stood out is the proof that communism doesn't work.
If we are "all equal", they should get back to working on those field crops, right?
WhyNice anthem but socialism in general doesn't work unfortunately
They’re not socialists. China adopts state capitalism. They couldn’t have enjoyed such a meteoric economic rise under socialism.Communist China is the current socialist superpower.
Edit: Wow, what a beautiful song.
what does communism and the ussr have to do with it? I replied you about the Russian empire, which you unfairly called "faaaaaar behind any civilized european country".I mean, if you have a population of 300+ million people, you will have quite a few scientists and intellectuals... even medieval Mongolia, which you probably wouldn't consider as the most advanced country in the world, produced Genghis Khan which conquered half of euro-asia
But for the most part, an average USSR citizen was just looking for a way to afford his daily bread. Not to mention, the fact these genetically gifted people, athletes, intellectuals etc stood out is the proof that communism doesn't work.
If we are "all equal", they should get back to working on those field crops, right?
Oh here we go again with the coping talking pointsThey’re not socialists. China adopts state capitalism. China couldn’t have enjoyed such a meteoric economic rise under socialism.
