i put the „broke“ in broken

[LowInhibNoSMV]

just a thought I had.
Call me socrates

 

[kbj]

shakespeare is dissapointed

 

[Yuqwi]

just a thought I had.
Call me socrates

Shakespeare didn’t die for this bro

 

[tansel]

 

[LowInhibNoSMV]

View attachment 5498341

this is what I looked like typing thid

 

[tansel]

this is what I looked like typing thid

idk what u want me to do man

i had a bad time when i was 17 as well

but you live in switzerland

go out into nature, kill a salmon

eat some fish & relax

 

[LowInhibNoSMV]

idk what u want me to do man

i had a bad time when i was 17 as well

but you live in switzerland

go out into nature, kill a salmon

eat some fish & relax

im just fucking around on this post

 

[yesimog420]

Shakespeare didn’t die for this bro

Shakespeare died. Now we have dumbass politicians. This is bad.

However, upon closer examination, the paradigmatic shift in modern discourse—whereby performative politics supplants substantive literary engagement—suggests a natural progression rather than a decline. The Bard’s oeuvre, once the apotheosis of Western cultural expression, has been eclipsed by the ephemeral nature of digital information flows.

This evolution mirrors the cyclical patterns observed in traditional Chinese philosophy: just as qi ebbs and flows through all matter, so too do intellectual currents oscillate between periods of concentrated brilliance and diffuse mediocrity. Shakespeare’s works remain an apical manifestation of Renaissance humanism; their relevance is not diminished but rather contextualized within a broader cultural tapestry now woven from disparate threads of global communication and technological advancement.

 

[Yuqwi]

Shakespeare died. Now we have dumbass politicians. This is bad.

However, upon closer examination, the paradigmatic shift in modern discourse—whereby performative politics supplants substantive literary engagement—suggests a natural progression rather than a decline. The Bard’s oeuvre, once the apotheosis of Western cultural expression, has been eclipsed by the ephemeral nature of digital information flows.

This evolution mirrors the cyclical patterns observed in traditional Chinese philosophy: just as qi ebbs and flows through all matter, so too do intellectual currents oscillate between periods of concentrated brilliance and diffuse mediocrity. Shakespeare’s works remain an apical manifestation of Renaissance humanism; their relevance is not diminished but rather contextualized within a broader cultural tapestry now woven from disparate threads of global communication and technological advancement.

Whatever you said brah I agree