I see people with all the “good” features yet they’re still ugly/plain looking

[Deleted member 23324]

I see people with a conventionally good jaw, eyes, hair, cheekbones, body, etc, but they’re still very plain looking and wouldn’t be deemed as attractive.

But then I see some people with barely any “good” features yet they are somehow attractive/pleasant to look at.

This makes me think there’s more to looks than just having conventionally “good” features.

It’s gotta be something related to genetics that we can’t explain like harmony or maybe it has to do with our baseline hormone levels.

 

[PastillaNegra]

harmony

 

[siliconvalleycel]

To look above par you must be... Above par.
In autist, no failos + 1 halo minimum

 

[Deleted member 23558]

Wrong. Never seen someone with good cheekbones be bad looking unless recession or bug eyes.

 

[Deleted member 23554]

probably good coloring with average bones

 

[Lonenely sigma]

Wrong. Never seen someone with good cheekbones be bad looking unless recession or bug eyes.

yeah many people don't really pay attention to zygos as much as they should, its very difficult to have good zygos and look bad, let alone have a good eye area, jaw etc.

 

[Deleted member 16133]

Wrong. Never seen someone with good cheekbones be bad looking unless recession or bug eyes.

yeah many people don't really pay attention to zygos as much as they should, its very difficult to have good zygos and look bad, let alone have a good eye area, jaw etc.

i have the most defined zygos but ppl here say i am "unpleasant" to look at does that mean im ugly i know i am not the best looking at times i find myself extremely ugly due to a lack of soft cute features like baby face cute small button nose round eyes small forehead etc. tbh

 

[Deleted member 23558]

i have the most defined zygos but ppl here say i am "unpleasant" to look at does that mean im ugly i know i am not the best looking at times i find myself extremely ugly due to a lack of soft cute features like baby face cute small button nose round eyes small forehead etc. tbh

No you just need to bring the other features to bsseline ur zygo is ur best feature

 

[Deleted member 23218]

i have the most defined zygos but ppl here say i am "unpleasant" to look at does that mean im ugly i know i am not the best looking at times i find myself extremely ugly due to a lack of soft cute features like baby face cute small button nose round eyes small forehead etc. tbh

your jaw is too big

 

[Deleted member 16133]

No you just need to bring the other features to bsseline ur zygo is ur best feature

i just dont understand what my problem is maybe high hairline and nose tbh or shitty phenotype maybe lips too bc i have extremely compact square orbitals forward grown supras giga forward grown maxilla wide and high set zygos jaw could be a bit wider tbh i have tall square chin with projection positive eyebrow tilt and 5.5 degrees of PCT i dont get what my problem is maybe its time for me to hygiene maxx and gymmaxx

 

[Deleted member 16133]

your jaw is too big

how? will getting less bone unironically ascend me through bone shaving ? i have higher set zygos than barret i just wanna know

taken from ss from months ago

 

[Deleted member 23218]

i just dont understand what my problem is maybe high hairline and nose tbh or shitty phenotype maybe lips too bc i have extremely compact square orbitals forward grown supras giga forward grown maxilla wide and high set zygos jaw could be a bit wider tbh i have tall square chin with projection positive eyebrow tilt and 5.5 degrees of PCT i dont get what my problem is maybe its time for me to hygiene maxx and gymmaxx

your zygos look mogger to me but your jaw is kinds uncanny. Im not too much of a psl autist so i may be wrong

 

[Deleted member 19878]

Repeat after me : Harmony, you can have insane bones without harmony and at least average ratios they won't look good.
Also you need a decent pheno, you can have ramirez-tier zygos if you are dravidian it'll still be over

 

[2d v2]

I see people with a conventionally good jaw, eyes, hair, cheekbones, body, etc, but they’re still very plain looking and wouldn’t be deemed as attractive.

But then I see some people with barely any “good” features yet they are somehow attractive/pleasant to look at.

This makes me think there’s more to looks than just having conventionally “good” features.

It’s gotta be something related to genetics that we can’t explain like harmony or maybe it has to do with our baseline hormone levels.

good hormones reflect through skin

low estrogen and high t in men

high estrogen and low t in women

 

[Alphacentauri5555]

I see people with a conventionally good jaw, eyes, hair, cheekbones, body, etc, but they’re still very plain looking and wouldn’t be deemed as attractive.

But then I see some people with barely any “good” features yet they are somehow attractive/pleasant to look at.

This makes me think there’s more to looks than just having conventionally “good” features.

It’s gotta be something related to genetics that we can’t explain like harmony or maybe it has to do with our baseline hormone levels.

harmony as as talked about on this forum doesnt really exist as its always being healthy facially wise. its a good term when just talking about overall aesthetics but all it really is is really good features (in relation to each other)