I sound retarded when i type

[Asiangymmax]

And when i talk
I tend to put 0 effort into what i talk about and i constantly talk about the same shit which leads some people here to assume im mentally disabled
But trust me im at least 90th ish percentile gai which is like 120 i got 117 fsiq on the old sat and I consistently get 90+ percentile on reasoning and numerical on BRGHT

 

[Gaygymmaxx]

And when i talk
I tend to put 0 effort into what i talk about and i constantly talk about the same shit which leads some people here to assume im mentally disabled
But trust me im at least 90th ish percentile gai

Surely

 

[Asiangymmax]

Surely

Surely

 

[superpsycho]

same

 

[Asiangymmax]

And when i talk
I tend to put 0 effort into what i talk about and i constantly talk about the same shit which leads some people here to assume im mentally disabled
But trust me im at least 90th ish percentile gai

I was put into this ironically retarded behavior with certain people i used to talk with and now i talk ironically constantly

 

[superpsycho]

Surely

 

[Asiangymmax]

Bump

 

[Dirlewanger333]

You sound retarded when you speak as well

 

[Asiangymmax]

You sound retarded when you speak as well

Nigga

 

[Dirlewanger333]

im at least 90th ish percentile gai which is like 120 i got 117 fsiq on the old sat

SAT isn't IQ and you haven't gotten an IQ test professionally. You don't know your IQ

 

[Asiangymmax]

SAT isn't IQ and you haven't gotten an IQ test professionally. You don't know your IQ

You dont know what your talking about
Talking about the 1980 sat normed for iq

 

[Looks over NT]

I scored 86 on brght but i make up for it with self awareness and creativity

 

[Dirlewanger333]

You dont know what your talking about
Talking about the 1980 sat normed for iq

IQ scores have risen an estimated 10-12 points since 1980. The SAT is not an IQ test and you cannot substitute it for IQ. Even if so, you haven't gotten it done professionally. Stop saying ti's your IQ unless you actually get it tested.

 

[Asiangymmax]

IQ scores have risen an estimated 10-12 points since 1980. The SAT is not an IQ test and you cannot substitute it for IQ. Even if so, you haven't gotten it done professionally

Its normed on modern populations

 

[Dirlewanger333]

Its normed on modern populations

No, the 1980 SAT is not normed on modern populations.
The SAT has undergone multiple re-normings and redesigns since 1980 to adjust for changes in education, demographics, and average test-taker performance. The scoring and difficulty levels from 1980 reflect the norms of the student population at that time, not today's.

Key Differences:​

• The SAT was re-centered in 1995, adjusting score distributions because averages had drifted downward since the original norms.
• The test format and content have significantly changed (major revisions in 1995, 2005, 2016, and 2024, with the latest being the digital SAT).
• Populations taking the test today are more diverse and larger in number, with shifts in preparation methods and educational standards.

Bottom Line:​

If you're comparing a 1980 SAT score to today's, direct comparisons are unreliable without adjusting for these changes. Educational researchers can estimate equivalencies, but the test itself is not re-normed retroactively on modern populations.


Ask ChatGPT

 

[Asiangymmax]

No, the 1980 SAT is not normed on modern populations.
The SAT has undergone multiple re-normings and redesigns since 1980 to adjust for changes in education, demographics, and average test-taker performance. The scoring and difficulty levels from 1980 reflect the norms of the student population at that time, not today's.

Key Differences:​

• The SAT was re-centered in 1995, adjusting score distributions because averages had drifted downward since the original norms.
• The test format and content have significantly changed (major revisions in 1995, 2005, 2016, and 2024, with the latest being the digital SAT).
• Populations taking the test today are more diverse and larger in number, with shifts in preparation methods and educational standards.

Bottom Line:​

If you're comparing a 1980 SAT score to today's, direct comparisons are unreliable without adjusting for these changes. Educational researchers can estimate equivalencies, but the test itself is not re-normed retroactively on modern populations.


Ask ChatGPT

Your asking chatgpt about the actual sat scores
The iq conversion is normed on modern pips

 

[Dirlewanger333]

Your asking chatgpt about the actual sat scores
The iq conversion is normed on modern pips

Says where?

 

[Asiangymmax]

Says where?

Common sense
Anyways idk why ur tryna refute the test 117 isnt even a good score

 

[Looks over NT]

No, the 1980 SAT is not normed on modern populations.
The SAT has undergone multiple re-normings and redesigns since 1980 to adjust for changes in education, demographics, and average test-taker performance. The scoring and difficulty levels from 1980 reflect the norms of the student population at that time, not today's.

Key Differences:​

• The SAT was re-centered in 1995, adjusting score distributions because averages had drifted downward since the original norms.
• The test format and content have significantly changed (major revisions in 1995, 2005, 2016, and 2024, with the latest being the digital SAT).
• Populations taking the test today are more diverse and larger in number, with shifts in preparation methods and educational standards.

Bottom Line:​

If you're comparing a 1980 SAT score to today's, direct comparisons are unreliable without adjusting for these changes. Educational researchers can estimate equivalencies, but the test itself is not re-normed retroactively on modern populations.


Ask ChatGPT

i scored 99th percentile on a quantitative reasoning test but i feel dumb. is numerical/logical-mathematical reasoning correlated with tested iq? i know i said i scored 86 on brght earlier but i was just having an off-day.

 

[Asiangymmax]

i scored 99th percentile on a quantitative reasoning test but i feel dumb. is numerical/logical-mathematical reasoning correlated with tested iq? i know i said i scored 86 on brght earlier but i was just having an off-day.

What were your subtest scores on the brght

 

[Dirlewanger333]

Common sense

You must cite a source or youre wrong

Anyways idk why ur tryna refute the test 117 isnt even a good score

Because it's objectively wrong

 

[Looks over NT]

What were your subtest scores on the brght

like 90s in numerical and spatial and 70s in logical

 

[Asiangymmax]

like 90s in numerical and spatial and 70s in logical

I get consistent 90s in numerical and logical but my spatial is always sub50

 

[Asiangymmax]

I get consistent 90s in numerical and logical but my spatial is always sub50

Is that a npc trait tbh

 

[Looks over NT]

Is that a npc trait tbh

is spatial that one where you rotate shapes in your mind or something? how is that useful irl?

 

[Asiangymmax]

is spatial that one where you rotate shapes in your mind or something? how is that useful irl?

Its useful for engineering i think

 

[Looks over NT]

Its useful for engineering i think

cant you just become a doctor tho?

 

[Asiangymmax]

cant you just become a doctor tho?

True
Msybe if i take another iq tesy i wont be sub120 anymore

 

[Dirlewanger333]

is spatial that one where you rotate shapes in your mind or something? how is that useful irl?

It helps you learn things easily in STEM

 

[Looks over NT]

It helps you learn things easily in STEM

how come jews are good at stem and they have relatively low spatial?

 

[Dirlewanger333]

how come jews are good at stem and they have relatively low spatial?

Where did you hear that from?

 

[Looks over NT]

Where did you hear that from?

its well known they have elevated verbal and mathematical intelligence and relatively lower spatial - thats their iq profile. They're good at stem and are overrepresented there, esp in math