I struggle to find original threads

[Quicksand]

No, I don't think mentioning Nietzsche or being edgy (there's a significant correlation between the two) is noteworthy

It's pedissequous (such a big word)


Ask yourselves why, if philosophy is generally considered a mentally masturbatory practice (I might vaguely agree with its “old-fashionedness”, but I'm not sure), you manage to understand such enormous pillars (irony take me away) as Nietzsche (Evola, lol) and, to a lesser extent (in the sense of being less mentioned, but I could be wrong), Schopenhauer.

Perhaps, and I say perhaps, they are easily (too easily) “accessible”?

Most likely, “On Sense and Reference” (Frege is relatively unknown, which is why I mention him) is considerably more useful than Zarawhatever
Hegel, just to name one, is somehow less popular than Nietzsche

Strange, isn't it?

 

[Quicksand]

This is a shitty thread, don't read it

 

[NoExit]

nothing about this forum is original anyway, we are just copy of a copy of a copy of lookism which is a copy of slut/puaheate

 

[oculus]

nothing about this forum is original anyway, we are just copy of a copy of a copy of lookism which is a copy of slut/puaheate

the owner of puahate told media outlets about ER having an account and posting shit i think i have a screenshot of what he said

 

[Eskorbutin]

I came to the first step of understanding the world thanks to Hegel. I believe people don't read those anymore because it is easier for them to get a digested very comfortable Nietzsche (following examples here) take that fits what they want to hear and so on. Our system tries to exaltate individualism — despite leaving no place for anything than pre established options so people naturally tend to what is sold as the solution.