I think I found the best rating AI (GTFIH)

[KT-34]

First off read this shit you actually need it


I've been playing around with multiple AI on the Explore option of chatgpt for the last couple of days, the most popular one for rating being the looksmaxxing one with chico pic, but the one right below it I found to be much more accurate

because it actually takes into account the pic itself, lighting and angle and then try to asses your looks by themselves

I've tried all sorts of pics, mine obviously but then I tried psl gods and famous actors and here's where it gets interesting


It can tell from any angle if you look good or not, I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

I thought that it was probably trained with these faces already and that's why it can asses them, but then I tried with random chadlites and forum chads, ehren, orb, zeta etc....

And they actually get very high rating, even in bad pics the AI always rates them 7 then says that in different angle he would get 8, and then it actually does that


Off course there are some inconsisties, and the AI is stubborn af, if it gives you a rating it will stick to it during the whole convo and if you want a proper rating do one rating per picture

 

[KT-34]

Also can tell if you're using filters so no frauding

 

[Cyframe]

Damn, thats actually dope asf

 

[KT-34]

Damn, thats actually dope asf

The only flaw imo is that it doesn't really take into account coloring specially eye color

 

[Cyframe]

The only flaw imo is that it doesn't really take into account coloring specially eye color

Is it paid btw?

Also for the eye color, we can just manually add or subtract points

 

[KT-34]

Is it paid btw?

Also for the eye color, we can just manually add or subtract points

Nope, but you need an account on chatgpt and if you use the free version you have like 3 pics every 11 hours

 

[Cyframe]

Nope, but you need an account on chatgpt and if you use the free version you have like 3 pics every 11 hours

That's really nice. Thanks for letting me know. Based Thread.

 

[racemixedsub5]

First off read this shit you actually need it


I've been playing around with multiple AI on the Explore option of chatgpt for the last couple of days, the most popular one for rating being the looksmaxxing one with chico pic, but the one right below it I found to be much more accurate

View attachment 3686197 because it actually takes into account the pic itself, lighting and angle and then try to asses your looks by themselves

I've tried all sorts of pics, mine obviously but then I tried psl gods and famous actors and here's where it gets interesting


It can tell from any angle if you look good or not, I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

I thought that it was probably trained with these faces already and that's why it can asses them, but then I tried with random chadlites and forum chads, ehren, orb, zeta etc....

And they actually get very high rating, even in bad pics the AI always rates them 7 then says that in different angle he would get 8, and then it actually does that


Off course there are some inconsisties, and the AI is stubborn af, if it gives you a rating it will stick to it during the whole convo and if you want a proper rating do one rating per picture

Where tf is this on chatgpt never heard of it?

 

[racemixedsub5]

First off read this shit you actually need it


I've been playing around with multiple AI on the Explore option of chatgpt for the last couple of days, the most popular one for rating being the looksmaxxing one with chico pic, but the one right below it I found to be much more accurate

View attachment 3686197 because it actually takes into account the pic itself, lighting and angle and then try to asses your looks by themselves

I've tried all sorts of pics, mine obviously but then I tried psl gods and famous actors and here's where it gets interesting


It can tell from any angle if you look good or not, I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

I thought that it was probably trained with these faces already and that's why it can asses them, but then I tried with random chadlites and forum chads, ehren, orb, zeta etc....

And they actually get very high rating, even in bad pics the AI always rates them 7 then says that in different angle he would get 8, and then it actually does that


Off course there are some inconsisties, and the AI is stubborn af, if it gives you a rating it will stick to it during the whole convo and if you want a proper rating do one rating per picture

I change my mind this ai gave me a htn rating and cl potential fucking cope

 

[KT-34]

I change my mind this ai gave me a htn rating and cl potential fucking cope

Sometimes you just actually look good bhai

 

[Changmentum]

It rated me a 6.7/10, which is a bit generous but not too off. Told me I’m a high MTN too.

 

[KT-34]

It rated me a 6.7/10, which is a bit generous but not too off. Told me I’m a high MTN too.

Gave me a 6.2 with normal pics so I'm good

I noticed that it is stubborn tho like if I put a horrendous pic it's gonna give a 5.5 but if I add a good pic it's gonna barely increase the score, on the other hand if I put a great pic that gets me a 6.4 then a horrendous one it's not gonna lower the score

 

[cytoplasm]

I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

So its useless then

 

[KT-34]

So its useless then

Other way around imo, the AI itself didn't know who it was, meaning if you look good it will be able to tell even if you use bad angles, of course there's a limit like you make the weirdest face with the camera stuck to your face it's gonna get you a bad rating

 

[cytoplasm]

Other way around imo, the AI itself didn't know who it was, meaning if you look good it will be able to tell even if you use bad angles, of course there's a limit like you make the weirdest face with the camera stuck to your face it's gonna get you a bad rating

Zurzolo and delon arent 8/10 and them being rated that high in worst pics is even worse

 

[KT-34]

Zurzolo and delon arent 8/10 and them being rated that high in worst pics is even worse

Can you find me in less than 2 minutes an entire comment section of women simping for jordan or draco the same way women simp for delon and zurzolo

 

[itsover666]

First off read this shit you actually need it


I've been playing around with multiple AI on the Explore option of chatgpt for the last couple of days, the most popular one for rating being the looksmaxxing one with chico pic, but the one right below it I found to be much more accurate

View attachment 3686197 because it actually takes into account the pic itself, lighting and angle and then try to asses your looks by themselves

I've tried all sorts of pics, mine obviously but then I tried psl gods and famous actors and here's where it gets interesting


It can tell from any angle if you look good or not, I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

I thought that it was probably trained with these faces already and that's why it can asses them, but then I tried with random chadlites and forum chads, ehren, orb, zeta etc....

And they actually get very high rating, even in bad pics the AI always rates them 7 then says that in different angle he would get 8, and then it actually does that


Off course there are some inconsisties, and the AI is stubborn af, if it gives you a rating it will stick to it during the whole convo and if you want a proper rating do one rating per picture

is it free

 

[cytoplasm]

Can you find me in less than 2 minutes an entire comment section of women simping for jordan or draco the same way women simp for delon and zurzolo

You can also finde plenty of women simping for pedro pascal, tom holland etc. What would that prove?

 

[KT-34]

You can also finde plenty of women simping for pedro pascal, tom holland etc. What would that prove?

Pedro is decently attractive and appeals to older women

When I type tom holland and check the first comment section I won't find a single comment about his looks

All four are actors and benefit from status, jordan would probably be more popular if he had acting skills but it doesn't take away that Alan and zurzolo are very appealing to women, plus they don't have a lot of big movies and they're far more famous for their looks than their acting skills unlike the other two

 

[cytoplasm]

Pedro is decently attractive and appeals to older women

When I type tom holland and check the first comment section I won't find a single comment about his looks

All four are actors and benefit from status, jordan would probably be more popular if he had acting skills but it doesn't take away that Alan and zurzolo are very appealing to women, plus they don't have a lot of big movies and they're far more famous for their looks than their acting skills unlike the other two

I didnt say delon and zurzolo werent appealing to women. They arent 8/10 which is chad tier

 

[cytoplasm]

It gave this a 9/10

 

[sigmamogger]

Nigga rated me a 3

 

[KT-34]

Nigga rated me a 3

Ain't no way

 

[sigmamogger]

Ain't no way

Nvm posted a better pic and rated me 5.3

 

[overtier1011]

It gave me 6.2. I put zero distortion photo. But i am weak mtn so i should have been rated 4-4.5. What do you think about it @KT-34

 

[cytoplasm]

Nvm posted a better pic and rated me 5.3

Thats still pretty bad. It rates joao felix 8

 

[sigmamogger]

Thats still pretty bad. It rates joao felix 8

I'm aware that I'm chopped org ratings have fooled me into believing 5/10 is MTN I guess not tho

 

[FutureSlayer]

Got 6.7 with a closeup selfie

 

[cytoplasm]

I'm aware that I'm chopped org ratings have fooled me into believing 5/10 is MTN I guess not tho

I asked again and it gave him 6.5

It gave tom cruise between 6.5 and 9.5

Also

 

[sigmamogger]

I asked again and it gave him 6.5

It gave tom cruise between 6.5 and 9.5

Also
View attachment 3693109

This ai is trash nigga

 

[Muftalifts]

First off read this shit you actually need it


I've been playing around with multiple AI on the Explore option of chatgpt for the last couple of days, the most popular one for rating being the looksmaxxing one with chico pic, but the one right below it I found to be much more accurate

View attachment 3686197 because it actually takes into account the pic itself, lighting and angle and then try to asses your looks by themselves

I've tried all sorts of pics, mine obviously but then I tried psl gods and famous actors and here's where it gets interesting


It can tell from any angle if you look good or not, I used the worst possible pics for zurzolo and alan delon for instance and they still got rated 8+

I thought that it was probably trained with these faces already and that's why it can asses them, but then I tried with random chadlites and forum chads, ehren, orb, zeta etc....

And they actually get very high rating, even in bad pics the AI always rates them 7 then says that in different angle he would get 8, and then it actually does that


Off course there are some inconsisties, and the AI is stubborn af, if it gives you a rating it will stick to it during the whole convo and if you want a proper rating do one rating per picture

Gave me 7.7

 

[KT-34]

Gave me 7.7

Mogger

 

[KT-34]

I asked again and it gave him 6.5

It gave tom cruise between 6.5 and 9.5

Also
View attachment 3693109

I take back what I said, it's bad but still the best one I used so far

Probably trained on celebrity etc... That's why it recognizes celebrities

 

[Boyoshutup]

How can i use this

 

[KT-34]

It gave me 6.2. I put zero distortion photo. But i am weak mtn so i should have been rated 4-4.5. What do you think about it @KT-34

Idk, I feel like it overrates celebrities but a perfectly average dude is gonna get fairly rated

 

[cytoplasm]

I take back what I said, it's bad but still the best one I used so far

Probably trained on celebrity etc... That's why it recognizes celebrities

It seems pretty good at times actually. And then it spews bs like vasiliy stepanov having a recessed chin (frontal image). It also can rate the exact same pic differently each time

 

[KT-34]

It seems pretty good at times actually. And then it spews bs like vasiliy stepanov having a recessed chin (frontal image). It also can rate the exact same pic differently each time

I try not to gaslight it

But yeah AIs tend to be like that, it's also really stubborn, like I said it will always try it's best to stick to the first rating it gave you so try a new convo for each pic

 

[Muftalifts]

Mogger

Ts ain't 7.7
https://postimg.cc/gallery/QBJC8KZ
It prolly doesn't take your ethnicity into account
@KT-34

 

[KT-34]

https://ibb.co/1YBf0Z5g https://ibb.co/bDJ7c5V
Ts ain't 7.7
It prolly doesn't take your ethnicity into account

Haven't really tried ethnicities on it

But I'd guess it takes it into account as long as it's not a famous ethnic person

 

[Muftalifts]

Haven't really tried ethnicities on it

But I'd guess it takes it into account as long as it's not a famous ethnic person

Would rate me 7.7

 

[KT-34]

Would rate me 7.7

You might look good bhai

 

[Muftalifts]

You might look good bhai

https://postimg.cc/gallery/QBJC8KZ

 

[Afrab]

Datamining,

Damn, thats actually dope asf

This guy is his glownigger friend too.

 

[KT-34]

Datamining,

This guy is his glownigger friend too.

Nah I stood corrected on the AI, it has a really big flaw when it comes to celebrities, but it's the best one I found so far

 

[KT-34]

https://postimg.cc/gallery/QBJC8KZ

You do look good bro

 

[PSLdemigod]

thanks! just tried it, its very helpful, it's no way perfect, but it's good.

 

[Eto1205]

Told me that i have cooked browridge and nose and decent chin and jaw which makes sense

 

[6´3 LTN]

I got rated a 6.1/10 but i got 8.3/10 potential

 

[domitiynotme]

it gave 5.5 and hardmaxx potential 8

 

[Ogen]

Not that stubborn, I got it to change my rating from 4,2 to 7,4 with the same pic LOL