Never Get Up
Keep grindin, keep hustlin, shoot for your dreams
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
- Posts
- 7,981
- Reputation
- 15,506
How does it age you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
How does it age you?
Everyone is different ig tbh.That’s weird
I’ve been eating the most sugar I ever have and my skin is looking better
All carbohydrates break down into sugar.Everyone is different ig tbh.
I can gorge myself on goyslop, dairy and wheat but get nothing. But as soon as I touch sugar I get a breakout next day
Limiting carb intake lately. But cold turkey is hardAll carbohydrates break down into sugar.
Avoid them.
well I don't actually know.How does it age you?
It’s hard because it’s the truth. The longer you go on raw carnivore, the more you’ll realize how you’ve been eating poison your entire life.Limiting carb intake lately. But cold turkey is hard
Your body will convert fat and protein to sugar as well will it not?All carbohydrates break down into sugar.
Avoid them.
well I don't actually know.
But there's a guy I watched that tracks his longevity bio-markers and correlates them with foods he eats. And he found, at least for him fructose is pro-aging.
It could be specific too him, or glycation, or the opportunity cost of other foods, or a coincidence in the data.
But I do know fruit gives me more energy when I'm tired.
Gluconeogenesis exists because we didn’t eat carbohydrates millions of years ago like we do now.Your body will convert fat and protein to sugar as well will it not?
No it gives an energy boost because your brain runs off glucoseCarbohydrates give short term energy boost due to an elevation in blood sugar levels. However, over time, your energy storage units will be depleted from the damage of glucose and fructose. Glycation isn’t something to be ignored.
Your brain doesn’t only have to run on glucose. It can run on ketones.No it gives an energy boost because your brain runs off glucose
Yah.. seems like you either get glycation from sugar or arterial plaque from meat.Carbohydrates give short term energy boost due to an elevation in blood sugar levels. However, over time, your energy storage units will be depleted from the damage of glucose and fructose. Glycation isn’t something to be ignored.
Interesting. Thanks for sharing your experience.Your brain doesn’t only have to run on glucose. It can run on ketones.
You don’t have to eat carbohydrates. Gluconeogenesis is proof that we can survive without eating them.
That alone is enough proof that humans are designed by natural selection pressures to be carnivores.
10 months here and I’ve only increased in IQ every day rather than the opposite.
There is 0 evidence for the claim that meat causes arterial plaque. That is just straight up propaganda.Yah.. seems like you either get glycation from sugar or arterial plaque from meat.
I do know lower glycemic index foods result in much less glycation if following an omnivore diet. And certain meats result in less arterial plaque I believe.
Why is the Randle cycle even bad?There is 0 evidence for the claim that meat causes arterial plaque. That is just straight up propaganda.
An omnivorous diet is the worst diet possible. It’s even worse than veganism. You need to go research what the Randle Cycle is.
The Randle Cycle is the human bodies defense mechanism to exogenous glucose damaging its most important cells. Mixing carbohydrates and fats together actives this mechanism.Why is the Randle cycle even bad?
I know the theory behind the Randle cycle being bad for omnivores but I don't believe it, because omnivores regularly live past 100. The longest lived groups of people are all omnivores.There is 0 evidence for the claim that meat causes arterial plaque. That is just straight up propaganda.
An omnivorous diet is the worst diet possible. It’s even worse than veganism. You need to go research what the Randle Cycle is.
How?devolve but alr
name one good thing about processed sugarHow?
They didn’t live their lives with full health. They suffered from some sort of illness in one way or another. Who’s to say we aren’t supposed to live longer?I know the theory behind the Randle cycle being bad for omnivores but I don't believe it, because omnivores regularly live past 100. The longest lived groups of people are all omnivores.
I never said anything about processed sugarname one good thing about processed sugar
“Processed”name one good thing about processed sugar
If they lived to 100 they obviously suffered less from illnessThey didn’t live their lives with full health. They suffered from some sort of illness in one way or another. Who’s to say we aren’t supposed to live longer?
If they lived to 100 they obviously suffered less from illness.
1. According to whom on the basis of what implies that living to 100 is the highest life span we should reach?I’ve never seen a carnivore live to 100
processed sugar has no benefits while unprocessed contains vitamins and minerals and doesn't contain empty calories“Processed”
Unprocessed and processed sugar are the same molecules you retard.
processed sugar and unprocessed have differences and each effect you differently“Processed”
Unprocessed and processed sugar are the same molecules you retard.
blud thinks hes lydiastevia mogs
You are low IQ. Listen up very carefully as I’m only going to say this once.processed sugar has no benefits while unprocessed contains vitamins and minerals and doesn't contain empty calories
processed sugar has no benefits while unprocessed contains vitamins and minerals and doesn't contain empty calories
Fructose is the WORST form of carbohydrates to consume. Causes 7-11x more glycation than glucose.Also alot of studies on rats showing fructose causes stress and other problemsFructose-induced inflammation and increased cortisol: A new mechanism for how sugar induces visceral adiposity - PubMed
Traditionally, the leading hypothesis regarding the development of obesity involves caloric imbalance, whereby the amount of calories consumed exceeds the amount of calories burned which causes obesity. Another hypothesis for why we get fat has surfaced in the last decade which is the idea that...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
okay you seem to know more than me, but is there seriously no difference between the sugar you eat from fruit vs the sugar you would eat from candyYou are low IQ. Listen up very carefully as I’m only going to say this once.
1. Processed sugar and unprocessed ALL break down into the same molecules called glucose, except for fructose.
2. Exogenous sugar is extremely toxic and should NEVER be consumed. Randle Cycle activation and glycation (sugar binding to proteins and altering their structures).
3. Calories are units of heat energy. They can NOT be eaten. Heat has no rest mass. Humans consume MASS, not heat.
Audio:
View attachment 3419463
View attachment 3419470
Not in the sugar itselfokay you seem to know more than me, but is there seriously no difference between the sugar you eat from fruit vs the sugar you would eat from candy
ALL SUGAR THAT YOU EAT IS POISON. THAT IS IT.okay you seem to know more than me, but is there seriously no difference between the sugar you eat from fruit vs the sugar you would eat from candy
Fiber is not beneficial. It is contra-indicated. We can’t even digest it. We aren’t ruminant animals.Not in the sugar itself
There is a difference in that natural sugar usually contains fibre and micronutrients which are beneficial
do you have any science that proves thisALL SUGAR THAT YOU EAT IS POISON. THAT IS IT.
Fruits are not healthy.
do you have any science that proves this
Fiber is not beneficial. It is contra-indicated. We can’t even digest it. We aren’t ruminant animals.
do you have any science that proves this
What he means by this is “no”Ultimate guide regarding carbohydrates, Randle Cycle, calories, weight, and nutritional science | Why humans are obligate hyper carnivores | High IQ
Nutrition science: 1. There are 0 100% controlled, long term studies with humans locked in labs for multiple decades to provide proof on ANY aspect of health and nutrition science. 2. ALL exogenous carbohydrates break down into glucose leading to raised glucose levels which is UNDOUBTEDLY the...looksmax.org
Just absolutely false. It is literally indigestible and destroys our colon functioning.It absorbs toxins and excess hormones and gets rid of them while slowing digestion on which stops blood sugar spikes
Glycation is provable.What he means by this is “no”
I know it’s indigestible, that’s not necessarily a bad thingJust absolutely false. It is literally indigestible and destroys our colon functioning.
wtf should my diet be thenALL SUGAR THAT YOU EAT IS POISON. THAT IS IT.
Fruits are not healthy.
just meat broALL SUGAR THAT YOU EAT IS POISON. THAT IS IT.
Fruits are not healthy.
Yes, the benefit of having a colon that will not absorb nutrients properly.I know it’s indigestible, that’s not necessarily a bad thing
It has benefits like I said
Raw meat and animal fat only. One meal a day. For the rest of your life.wtf should my diet be then