i wanna die due to lack of foreskin

[cash.org]

I was circumcised at birth. And because of this: I want to kill myself. Let me explain.

I grew up in an evangelical Christian family - they mentioned that they didn't see an issue in the Bible due to Old Testament commandments, although they openly concede it isn't mandatory for individuals after Christ - in the United States; my parents circumcised me at birth.

Like many individuals when I hit adolescence: I started masturbating shortly afterwards. But I've always noticed that it's not very pleasurable at all. (Even with stuff... not like dry rubbing)

And the lubrication part? I didn't realize it was naturally destroyed until years later.

It gets even worse.

I can't even get into the ocean anymore. Recently, my exposed glans - from my lack of foreskin - become irritated, itchy, and sore in the salt water for days afterwards.

And here's the worst part.

I know that there's significant scientific debate on whether circumcision significantly affects sensitivity on parts of the penis that EXCLUDE the foreskin.

But that's not the point. I'll NEVER KNOW WHAT THOSE SPECIFIC NERVE ENDINGS FEEL LIKE. Does it not - even in the best case scenario - logically change the whole feeling of masturbation and sex in a much, much less pleasurable way?

So even if there isn't a significant change in pleasure for the REST of the penis: I'm missing a significant amount (majority?) of pleasurable sensations for the rest of my life.

I still have a sex drive: of course. But that makes it the worst part. There's not a lot of sensation at all. And I feel utterly humiliated because of this.

I've tried to cope with it. But I can't do it.

I've lost my faith in God. I resent my parents. And I just wish it could be undone.

I feel so emasculated.

And I just wish I could feel what sex/masturbation is actually supposed to feel like: just for ONE TIME in my life.

Is there any upcoming scientific research program that attempts to both RESTORE the foreskin and the NERVES lost as an infant?

I want to die right now. I'm filled with raw, horrific anger at what they did to me. I'll never have sex as it was supposed to be.

They mutilated me.

-I'll never have natural lubrication -I'll never have foreskin nerve endings -I'll never have an ability to reverse it

And if I tell anyone I know...

... they'll think I'm crazy.

Why is it so common in this country? How do religions defend the mutilation of children? How is this evil allowed?

Anyway I can cope with this? I do I handle being a man with this? I hate myself so much. What is wrong with this world?

I'm so, so desperate for an answer. I want my sexual relationships to be unaltered by this. But it seems like they'll always be tainted. I feel violated by my parents.

Is there anyone here circumcised as an adult that wants to help me cope? Because I don't know how to handle this.

I think of suicide everyday.

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

use a wet sock to goon to simulate fore skin

 

[Diᴏgenes]

is your foreskin 100% gone, even your frenulum? there is a community on reddit somewhere dedicated to foreskin restoration

 

[Ted Bundy]

https://www.amazon.com/Generic-frT-hava-beldo-restoration/dp/B0CVVZNLZB?th=1

 

[Sprinkles]

you don’t have to put up with not being able to bring out the head

 

[bigseedy]

imagine being brutally slaughtered fresh out the womb because ur parents have schizophrenia jfl im sorry

 

[fatblackjewishwoman]

Worst of all your foreskin was given to some fucking jew JFL

 

[Gilly998]

I've lost my faith in God. I resent my parents. And I just wish it could be undone.

Dont lose faith in God, God would be absolutely horrified at what your parents did to you, a non medical unneccecary radical modification forced irreverible mutilation of a innocent defenseless perfectly designed healthy babies only sensory sex organ is unfathomable, its a desecration and insult to gods creation and design and blessing of a baby

your parents knew you absolutely never would have wanted it, needed it or consented to it, there is literally zero upside to circumcism only purposly misleading stats which im happy to elaborate if anyones interested

The bible itself in the new testement says to not circumcise and Paul calls it "Mutilation of the flesh" which is exactly what it is

The Circumcism performed in the bible onto moses, paul, jesus etc is literally a tiny cut at the very end of the foreskin, leaving full glans coverage and structures intact, modern circumcism is a entirely different radically extreme procedure invented by Jewish Rabbis 150AD in ancient greece after jews were uncircumcising themselves, its a completely man made pure evil unimaginable archaic barbaric Jewish Rabbi invention

there is absolutely nothing god ordained about modern circumcism, the bible refers to even the tiny marking of the original biblical form of circumcism as mutilation, imagine how horrified God is about the 1000x more invasive extreme version of modern circumcism would be referred to, it is a complete wicked sadistic abomination of a cut

God greives over your sadness, he understands what youre going through, it is extremely valid and we unfortunately live in a fallen evil world where this is still possible to be done due to Jewish "freedom of religion" heavy lobbying with allows parents to abuse a legal grey zone to cut their healthy baby, God will hold those who did this to you accountable, the doctors who trick parents and strap down and cut babies listening to their bloodcurdling unforgettable screams of excruciating agony gutting a healthy genitals with flesh clamps and scalpels for a quick buck will be held accountable. (this is not a exageration either, this is literally what goes on in the actual procedure, you cant give a baby proper anesthesia to put them under because it will kill them nor can you give them painkillers, the procedure involves excruciatingly forcefully ripping apart the fused foreskin from the glans with a metal probe, going in completely blind, attaching a flesh clamp, slicing huge amounts of flesh off around it, fusing the cut with the clamp together so no stitches and they also go in with a scalpel to gut you of your frenulum very often)


however all hope is not lost,

First count yourself as EXTREMELY lucky and be extremely thankful if you have these left:

- if you have your frenulum intact or even remnants that is HUGE, ever mm of mine was entirely gutted out of me like a fish with a scalpel at birth
- if you have inner foreskin left that is HUGE, a lot of men have it entirely removed with only a few mm left below the glans by the sadistic pervert who cut them
- if you have loose movable skin thats is HUGE, most result in horrific overly tight cuts

if you have more than 1.5 inches of inner foreskin left and your frenulum left you are in a EXTREMELY good place and are one of the luckiest out of all people who were cut, not comparible to intact but having those puts you in the best case scenario out of all the mutilated as a baby people


now onto the next part, you are not forever locked out from experiencing pleasure close to how it was biologically intended, what you experience right now would be a 2/10 after you foreskin restore it will go to 7/10, you are currently keratinized (thickening of the epadermis due to chronic exposure, basically thickening callosing and drying of the glans and inner foreskin, it used to be mucosal tissue like the inside of your mouth but after decades of exposure gets covered in a protective layer of keratin, the same stuff your nails are made out of this extremely desensitises those parts and continues desensitisng forever into the future, if you think its bad now it will get nothing but worse as each year goes by)

if you commit and are patient to foreskin restoration which acts on the well known miracle process of tissue expansion from time under tension you can use your remaining inner foreskin and shaft skin to grow them longer until you have full coverage from a foreskin, you are not stretching you are EXPANDing and growing them it is a painless process, just constant reasonable tension

its all in your hands now if youre capable of commiting to 4-7 years of foreskin restoration (or more if youre not consistent) to experience lifelong benefits and regain the biological god given gift and fundamental human experience

those years will pass wether you do it or not, the sooner you commit the better or you can just give up and live a life never having experienced it, also restoration is much faster while young

it is a slow procces but after many years of patience and commitment just having it in your routine you will reach full coverage, this works functionally borderline the same as your original foreskin and looks the same, this will unlock full dekeratinisation and resensitisation of the glans and inner foreskin, return the gliding mechanism, eliminate the need for lubricants, unlock activation of stretch receptors, unlock the nerves to be activated from movement, add lots of variation and in a lot of reports is like going from black and white TV to full colour HD and unlocks many things that were never possible

it will be one of the best gifts you can give yourself, its much better to focus on what you can do and improve than to just live your life never getting to experience it


I am in the same boat as you, what I experience is nothing normal, I have been robbed completely of a god given biological gift and birthright that was meant to be shared with my future wife, I dont get enjoyment from what I current and have no sensitivity, I am completely mutilated, however I have purchased a foreskin restoration device and will wear it everyday for the next however many years it takes until I have full coverage, I refuse to not do anything about it

the whole reason its even popular in America is due to victorian era anti masterbation movement they said sexual pleasure causes epilepsy tubercelocus weakness etc etc so they said circumcism is the cure to remove as much sexual pleasure as possible to which is exactly what it does

also do not wait around thinking any medical advancements will come, unfortunately no, regenerative medicine is so far off that you will not be recconecting any of the cut extremely nerve dense specialised nerve endings, your only way of improving is with foreskin restoration, theres one company called Foregen claiming to work on foreskin regenerative medicine however that will never be comparible to restored foreskin and is very far off

 

[tarkdriad33]

Dont lose faith in God, God would be absolutely horrified at what your parents did to you, a non medical unneccecary radical modification forced irreverible mutilation of a innocent defenseless perfectly designed healthy babies only sensory sex organ is unfathomable, its a desecration and insult to gods creation and design and blessing of a baby

your parents knew you absolutely never would have wanted it, needed it or consented to it, there is literally zero upside to circumcism only purposly misleading stats which im happy to elaborate if anyones interested

The bible itself in the new testement says to not circumcise and Paul calls it "Mutilation of the flesh" which is exactly what it is

The Circumcism performed in the bible onto moses, paul, jesus etc is literally a tiny cut at the very end of the foreskin, leaving full glans coverage and structures intact, modern circumcism is a entirely different radically extreme procedure invented by Jewish Rabbis 150AD in ancient greece after jews were uncircumcising themselves, its a completely man made pure evil unimaginable archaic barbaric Jewish Rabbi invention

there is absolutely nothing god ordained about modern circumcism, the bible refers to even the tiny marking of the original biblical form of circumcism as mutilation, imagine how horrified God is about the 1000x more invasive extreme version of modern circumcism would be referred to, it is a complete wicked sadistic abomination of a cut

God greives over your sadness, he understands what youre going through, it is extremely valid and we unfortunately live in a fallen evil world where this is still possible to be done due to Jewish "freedom of religion" heavy lobbying with allows parents to abuse a legal grey zone to cut their healthy baby, God will hold those who did this to you accountable, the doctors who trick parents and strap down and cut babies listening to their bloodcurdling unforgettable screams of excruciating agony gutting a healthy genitals with flesh clamps and scalpels for a quick buck will be held accountable. (this is not a exageration either, this is literally what goes on in the actual procedure, you cant give a baby proper anesthesia to put them under because it will kill them nor can you give them painkillers, the procedure involves excruciatingly forcefully ripping apart the fused foreskin from the glans with a metal probe, going in completely blind, attaching a flesh clamp, slicing huge amounts of flesh off around it, fusing the cut with the clamp together so no stitches and they also go in with a scalpel to gut you of your frenulum very often)


however all hope is not lost,

First count yourself as EXTREMELY lucky and be extremely thankful if you have these left:

- if you have your frenulum intact or even remnants that is HUGE, ever mm of mine was entirely gutted out of me like a fish with a scalpel at birth
- if you have inner foreskin left that is HUGE, a lot of men have it entirely removed with only a few mm left below the glans by the sadistic pervert who cut them
- if you have loose movable skin thats is HUGE, most result in horrific overly tight cuts

if you have more than 1.5 inches of inner foreskin left and your frenulum left you are in a EXTREMELY good place and are one of the luckiest out of all people who were cut, not comparible to intact but having those puts you in the best case scenario out of all the mutilated as a baby people


now onto the next part, you are not forever locked out from experiencing pleasure close to how it was biologically intended, what you experience right now would be a 2/10 after you foreskin restore it will go to 7/10, you are currently keratinized (thickening of the epadermis due to chronic exposure, basically thickening callosing and drying of the glans and inner foreskin, it used to be mucosal tissue like the inside of your mouth but after decades of exposure gets covered in a protective layer of keratin, the same stuff your nails are made out of this extremely desensitises those parts and continues desensitisng forever into the future, if you think its bad now it will get nothing but worse as each year goes by)

if you commit and are patient to foreskin restoration which acts on the well known miracle process of tissue expansion from time under tension you can use your remaining inner foreskin and shaft skin to grow them longer until you have full coverage from a foreskin, you are not stretching you are EXPANDing and growing them it is a painless process, just constant reasonable tension

its all in your hands now if youre capable of commiting to 4-7 years of foreskin restoration (or more if youre not consistent) to experience lifelong benefits and regain the biological god given gift and fundamental human experience

those years will pass wether you do it or not, the sooner you commit the better or you can just give up and live a life never having experienced it, also restoration is much faster while young

it is a slow procces but after many years of patience and commitment just having it in your routine you will reach full coverage, this works functionally borderline the same as your original foreskin and looks the same, this will unlock full dekeratinisation and resensitisation of the glans and inner foreskin, return the gliding mechanism, eliminate the need for lubricants, unlock activation of stretch receptors, unlock the nerves to be activated from movement, add lots of variation and in a lot of reports is like going from black and white TV to full colour HD and unlocks many things that were never possible

it will be one of the best gifts you can give yourself, its much better to focus on what you can do and improve than to just live your life never getting to experience it


I am in the same boat as you, what I experience is nothing normal, I have been robbed completely of a god given biological gift and birthright that was meant to be shared with my future wife, I dont get enjoyment from what I current and have no sensitivity, I am completely mutilated, however I have purchased a foreskin restoration device and will wear it everyday for the next however many years it takes until I have full coverage, I refuse to not do anything about it

the whole reason its even popular in America is due to victorian era anti masterbation movement they said sexual pleasure causes epilepsy tubercelocus weakness etc etc so they said circumcism is the cure to remove as much sexual pleasure as possible to which is exactly what it does

also do not wait around thinking any medical advancements will come, unfortunately no, regenerative medicine is so far off that you will not be recconecting any of the cut extremely nerve dense specialised nerve endings, your only way of improving is with foreskin restoration, theres one company called Foregen claiming to work on foreskin regenerative medicine however that will never be comparible to restored foreskin and is very far off

Its not that deep

 

[Gilly998]

Its not that deep

for no medical reason forcefully irreversibly losing 85% of your fine touch receptors, most erogenous intensely pleasurable nerve dense structures, and being left with a keratinised glans and shaft skin isnt that deep?

all I have is a numb keratinised glans and normal shaft skin, everything else was gutted out from me, I am limited to only the weak minimal sensory input these can provide, my genitals was gutted like a fish at birth, max tightness, max removal, I experience no notable pleasure and it takes 40+ minutes to reach a weak uneventful orgasm

its as simple as saying cutting out 80% of your tounge removes 80% of your ability to taste

 

[tarkdriad33]

for no medical reason forcefully irreversibly losing 85% of your fine touch receptors, most erogenous intensely pleasurable nerve dense structures, and being left with a keratinised glans and shaft skin isnt that deep?

Yes, im circumsized and id rather not have foreskin

 

[Gilly998]

Yes, im circumsized and id rather not have foreskin

You have unfortunately been greatly mislead, there is zero upsides to being circumcised, only downsides, tell me the upsides you think you have and I will be happy to explain

 

[austrianpsycho]

I was circumcised at birth. And because of this: I want to kill myself. Let me explain.

I grew up in an evangelical Christian family - they mentioned that they didn't see an issue in the Bible due to Old Testament commandments, although they openly concede it isn't mandatory for individuals after Christ - in the United States; my parents circumcised me at birth.

Like many individuals when I hit adolescence: I started masturbating shortly afterwards. But I've always noticed that it's not very pleasurable at all. (Even with stuff... not like dry rubbing)

And the lubrication part? I didn't realize it was naturally destroyed until years later.

It gets even worse.

I can't even get into the ocean anymore. Recently, my exposed glans - from my lack of foreskin - become irritated, itchy, and sore in the salt water for days afterwards.

And here's the worst part.

I know that there's significant scientific debate on whether circumcision significantly affects sensitivity on parts of the penis that EXCLUDE the foreskin.

But that's not the point. I'll NEVER KNOW WHAT THOSE SPECIFIC NERVE ENDINGS FEEL LIKE. Does it not - even in the best case scenario - logically change the whole feeling of masturbation and sex in a much, much less pleasurable way?

So even if there isn't a significant change in pleasure for the REST of the penis: I'm missing a significant amount (majority?) of pleasurable sensations for the rest of my life.

I still have a sex drive: of course. But that makes it the worst part. There's not a lot of sensation at all. And I feel utterly humiliated because of this.

I've tried to cope with it. But I can't do it.

I've lost my faith in God. I resent my parents. And I just wish it could be undone.

I feel so emasculated.

And I just wish I could feel what sex/masturbation is actually supposed to feel like: just for ONE TIME in my life.

Is there any upcoming scientific research program that attempts to both RESTORE the foreskin and the NERVES lost as an infant?

I want to die right now. I'm filled with raw, horrific anger at what they did to me. I'll never have sex as it was supposed to be.

They mutilated me.

-I'll never have natural lubrication -I'll never have foreskin nerve endings -I'll never have an ability to reverse it

And if I tell anyone I know...

... they'll think I'm crazy.

Why is it so common in this country? How do religions defend the mutilation of children? How is this evil allowed?

Anyway I can cope with this? I do I handle being a man with this? I hate myself so much. What is wrong with this world?

I'm so, so desperate for an answer. I want my sexual relationships to be unaltered by this. But it seems like they'll always be tainted. I feel violated by my parents.

Is there anyone here circumcised as an adult that wants to help me cope? Because I don't know how to handle this.

I think of suicide everyday.

dnr
title sounds high iq tho

 

[tarkdriad33]

You have unfortunately been greatly mislead, there is zero upsides to being circumcised, only downsides, tell me the upsides you think you have and I will be happy to explain

Hygiene, easier cleaning, looks better with no foreskin, easier to do PE (penis enlargement)

 

[courtcase75]

Did you visit a doctor?

 

[Gilly998]

Hygiene, easier cleaning, looks better with no foreskin, easier to do PE (penis enlargement)

The hygeine is unfortunately completely untrue, every medical authority on the planet holds the strong stance that there is not a hygeine benefit and have for the past 30+ years that is a very old misconception from the 1900s

if your worry is shmegma it simply a natural completely harmless extremely slow buildup of dead skin and moisture, it takes multiple weeks of strictly no washing before it’s noticeable, it is harmless, not dirty it is not a std and is in many other areas of the body, women have more smegma buildup then men yet it’s unfathomable to circumcism them, smegma is a very soft water soluble material that washes away effortlessly completely eliminated with a 1 second rinse of water, smegma does not stick like dirt no scrubbing is involved it’s removal with water is essentially instantaneous, 70% of the planet is not cut, men aren’t walking around with problems there is nothing at all dangerous, unhygienic or unnatural about it, smegma also doesn’t even appear until well after puberty meaning a child does not even have it, it was well established unanimously by all medical institutions, doctors and authorities strongly and crystal clear 30 years before we were born that there is zero hygiene benefit and explicitly state that it should absolutely NEVER be performed for any individual claimed hygiene reasons, modern medicine did not nullify or change this its simply a non existent outdated misconception, it remains as simple as a rinse of water it is not a issue, the foreskin is perfectly designed, the foreskin is mucosal tissue like your mouth and eyelid it’s a self sufficient antibacterial antimicrobial environment protective covering which creates a very hygienic self sufficient environment, Even if someone literally didn’t EVER wash their genitals there is statistically well under 1% chance of any serious or long lasting effects and virtually zero dangerous outcomes, smegma buildup is a incredibly slow harmless natural intended process that women also have


looking better is a subjective view and completely not worth it at all with the enormous amounts of downsides involved in radically modifying a perfectly designed and evolved sex sensory organ, you literally cut off 50% of the surface area of the most erognous nerve dense area of your penis, a intact erect penis also looks the same as a circumcised one so where exactly is the better look, also a cirucmcised penis the glans becomes discouloured super dry and thickened which looks unhealthy and is undeniably worse looking in this state and is covered in hideous scars

here are extras too of the common purposly misleading lies of claimed benefits aswell, they are extremely sneaky saying relative risk reductions to purposly mislead people into thinking theres any benefit

1. Claim of reduction in AIDS
   WHO observational studies performed in Africa that are cited as a “38% reduction” of AIDs are extremely flawed and misleading, control group had a HIV rate of 2.1% and the circumcised group 1.3%, that’s a 0.8% absolute risk reduction, 0.8 / 2.1 = 36% purposely misleading relative risk reduction and exaggerated efficacy a irrelevant difference framed as a dramatic sounding percentage Meaning you’re cutting for a claimed 0.8% less chance of catching AIDs in a country where AIDs is not a issue The trials were stopped early the second they could claim a statistic threshold for benefit, participants of circumcism received significantly more intensive counseling, AIDs reminders and education, condom distribution and follow up care compared to the control group Countries with high circumcism rates don’t have lower HIV prevalence, circumcised USA has comparatively much higher AIDs transmission rates than intact countriesEven with this false misleading claim 1231 white males have to be circumcised for one dubiously claimed prevention of AIDsAIDs is not even relevant to new borns, also it’s not relevant in Australia or developed counties
   
   
2. Claim of preventing phimosis
   Less than 1% of men get Phimosis, a condition where the foreskin can’t be retracted over the glans, a incredibly rare and typically self resolving condition, it’s undiagnosable in children and the foreskin naturally doesn’t retract until puberty Completely treatable without surgery using steroid creams and gentle stretching, Circumcism is a absolute last resort preemptive cutting for this reason is preposterous
   
   
3. Claim of reduction in penile cancer Penile cancer is one of the rarest cancers in existence which occurs in 1 out of 100,000 men, it takes between 909 to 322,000 circumcisms for a claimed prevention of one penile cancer case averaged out this means if you’re circumcised you have a 0.00062% less chance of penile cancer, penile cancer occurs in 0.58 of 100,000 circumcised men and 1.33 of 100,000 in intact men, this means the absolute risk reduction of penile cancer (1.33 - 0.58  = 0.75) is 0.00075% with a extremely purposely misleading relative risk reduction of 56.39%, being circumcised reduces your actual chance of penile cancer by 0.00075% a insignificant laughably small percent it is unacceptable to use it as a reason, it also doesn’t occur until you’re a old man, this is the equivalent of calling for preemptive cutting of all women’s breasts for breast cancer who are hundreds of times more likely to get breast cancer anyway, there is no other body part that we call to preemptively remove to reduce a chance of cancer because it’s a insane non valid reason to cut out body parts, imagine saying female genital mutilation prevents cancer for women exactly you can’t, ironically circumcism is a risk factor for penile cancer because circumcism scars provides a place for HPV to start a cancer
   
   
4. Claim of prevention of inflamed foreskin (posthitis)1% of intact boys have this and is easily treated with anti fungal cream A female is significantly 75x more likely to experience a genital fungal infection than an intact male and experience it much worse, should we be circumcising women?
   
   5. Claim of prevention of UTIs125 normal infant boys would have to be circumcised at birth (for whom the risk of UTI is 1%) to prevent one UTI case, UTIs can be easily treated with antibiotics A female is 30x more likely to have a UTI than a than an intact male, should we be circumcising women?
   

 

[tarkdriad33]

The hygeine is unfortunately completely untrue, every medical authority on the planet holds the strong stance that there is not a hygeine benefit and have for the past 30+ years that is a very old misconception from the 1900s

if your worry is shmegma it simply a natural completely harmless extremely slow buildup of dead skin and moisture, it takes multiple weeks of strictly no washing before it’s noticeable, it is harmless, not dirty it is not a std and is in many other areas of the body, women have more smegma buildup then men yet it’s unfathomable to circumcism them, smegma is a very soft water soluble material that washes away effortlessly completely eliminated with a 1 second rinse of water, smegma does not stick like dirt no scrubbing is involved it’s removal with water is essentially instantaneous, 70% of the planet is not cut, men aren’t walking around with problems there is nothing at all dangerous, unhygienic or unnatural about it, smegma also doesn’t even appear until well after puberty meaning a child does not even have it, it was well established unanimously by all medical institutions, doctors and authorities strongly and crystal clear 30 years before we were born that there is zero hygiene benefit and explicitly state that it should absolutely NEVER be performed for any individual claimed hygiene reasons, modern medicine did not nullify or change this its simply a non existent outdated misconception, it remains as simple as a rinse of water it is not a issue, the foreskin is perfectly designed, the foreskin is mucosal tissue like your mouth and eyelid it’s a self sufficient antibacterial antimicrobial environment protective covering which creates a very hygienic self sufficient environment, Even if someone literally didn’t EVER wash their genitals there is statistically well under 1% chance of any serious or long lasting effects and virtually zero dangerous outcomes, smegma buildup is a incredibly slow harmless natural intended process that women also have


looking better is a subjective view and completely not worth it at all with the enormous amounts of downsides involved in radically modifying a perfectly designed and evolved sex sensory organ, you literally cut off 50% of the surface area of the most erognous nerve dense area of your penis, a intact erect penis also looks the same as a circumcised one so where exactly is the better look, also a cirucmcised penis the glans becomes discouloured super dry and thickened which looks unhealthy and is undeniably worse looking in this state

here are extras too of the common purposly misleading lies of claimed benefits aswell, they are extremely sneaky saying relative risk reductions to purposly mislead people into thinking theres any benefit

1. Claim of reduction in AIDS
   WHO observational studies performed in Africa that are cited as a “38% reduction” of AIDs are extremely flawed and misleading, control group had a HIV rate of 2.1% and the circumcised group 1.3%, that’s a 0.8% absolute risk reduction, 0.8 / 2.1 = 36% purposely misleading relative risk reduction and exaggerated efficacy a irrelevant difference framed as a dramatic sounding percentage Meaning you’re cutting for a claimed 0.8% less chance of catching AIDs in a country where AIDs is not a issue The trials were stopped early the second they could claim a statistic threshold for benefit, participants of circumcism received significantly more intensive counseling, AIDs reminders and education, condom distribution and follow up care compared to the control group Countries with high circumcism rates don’t have lower HIV prevalence, circumcised USA has comparatively much higher AIDs transmission rates than intact countriesEven with this false misleading claim 1231 white males have to be circumcised for one dubiously claimed prevention of AIDsAIDs is not even relevant to new borns, also it’s not relevant in Australia or developed counties
   
   
2. Claim of preventing phimosis
   Less than 1% of men get Phimosis, a condition where the foreskin can’t be retracted over the glans, a incredibly rare and typically self resolving condition, it’s undiagnosable in children and the foreskin naturally doesn’t retract until puberty Completely treatable without surgery using steroid creams and gentle stretching, Circumcism is a absolute last resort preemptive cutting for this reason is preposterous
   
   
3. Claim of reduction in penile cancer Penile cancer is one of the rarest cancers in existence which occurs in 1 out of 100,000 men, it takes between 909 to 322,000 circumcisms for a claimed prevention of one penile cancer case averaged out this means if you’re circumcised you have a 0.00062% less chance of penile cancer, penile cancer occurs in 0.58 of 100,000 circumcised men and 1.33 of 100,000 in intact men, this means the absolute risk reduction of penile cancer (1.33 - 0.58  = 0.75) is 0.00075% with a extremely purposely misleading relative risk reduction of 56.39%, being circumcised reduces your actual chance of penile cancer by 0.00075% a insignificant laughably small percent it is unacceptable to use it as a reason, it also doesn’t occur until you’re a old man, this is the equivalent of calling for preemptive cutting of all women’s breasts for breast cancer who are hundreds of times more likely to get breast cancer anyway, there is no other body part that we call to preemptively remove to reduce a chance of cancer because it’s a insane non valid reason to cut out body parts, imagine saying female genital mutilation prevents cancer for women exactly you can’t, ironically circumcism is a risk factor for penile cancer because circumcism scars provides a place for HPV to start a cancer
   
   
4. Claim of prevention of inflamed foreskin (posthitis)1% of intact boys have this and is easily treated with anti fungal cream A female is significantly 75x more likely to experience a genital fungal infection than an intact male and experience it much worse, should we be circumcising women?
   
   5. Claim of prevention of UTIs125 normal infant boys would have to be circumcised at birth (for whom the risk of UTI is 1%) to prevent one UTI case, UTIs can be easily treated with antibiotics A female is 30x more likely to have a UTI than a than an intact male, should we be circumcising women?
   

not reading your ai slop bro

 

[Gilly998]

not reading your ai slop bro

Its not AI man, that is all manually typed by me word for word after insane amounts of research I had those points saved after sending it to my dad, after learning what was done to me and what ive lost I have been researching this topic for months

 

[Gilly998]

Fine-touch pressure thresholds in the adult penis - PubMed

The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"Conclusions: The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis."


The most erogenous, most highest density of nerves most intensely pleasurable structures have been carved out of you and thrown into the bin

the least senstive part of a intact penis is more senstive than the most sensitive part of a circumcised penis

your sensitive scarline from where these were cut out of is nothing but a unobtainable glimpse into what was forever stolen from you

you will never feel remotely close to what a intact person does


if it can paint the picture better for you humans are embrologically homogulous, our genitals form from the same thing,

it removes the entire ridged band a extremely erognous highly sensitive extremely pleasurable nerve dense structure connected to the frenulum delta

removing the frenulum from a man is the equivolent of removing the clitoral frenulum from a woman (the most sensitive pleasurable part of the clitoris), the frenulum in a man is considered the male "G spot" and is key to intense electric pleasure and orgasm intensity

removing the inner and outer foreskin from a man is the equivolent of removing the tibia and clitoral hood from a woman

the devastating effects this has on a womans ability to feel pleasure is the same devastating effects it has on a man

by cutting these out you can no longer experience the unique intensely pleasurable sensations these structures once provided

all you have left is shaft skin and a keratinised thickened numb dry glans

sure it may still be "pleasurable" from remaining deep temperature and pressure nerves but what you have is 20% of what you were meant to experience, you just have no frame of reference or comparison


youre not meant to require lubricant at all
youre not meant to be extremely high friction based stimulation at all
youre not meant to feel nothing notable until orgasm with it just being a goal orientated race to orgasm, youre meant to have that feeling of orgasm as intense whole bodied spreading pleasure in waves from the very start to the end that stacks
youre not meant to be painfully sensitive right after orgasm and need to stop, thats due to lack of fine touch nerves from reaching your spinal cord leaving you with just the overly sensitive pain receptors of your glans to be perceived

these are issues entirely due to circumcism with many many more than just that

it is much less enjoyable and uncomfortable for the woman aswell due to it converting a effortless experience into a numb jackhammer extremely high friction scraping one that removes lubricant, a woman orgasms 70% less with a circumcised man and experience significantly higher discomfort and pain and avoidance of sex from studies in europe