Deleted member 6723
ㅤ
- Joined
- May 1, 2020
- Posts
- 21,047
- Reputation
- 55,233
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
u wanting it doesnt matter if u dont consent its still considered rape whether u want it or not. I mean u could be horny but dont want to fuck for some reason, could be something similar to nofap.If you want it then I don't think its rape
I think that if you can prove that theyu wanting it doesnt matter if u dont consent its still considered rape whether u want it or not. I mean u could be horny but dont want to fuck for some reason, could be something similar to nofap.
jfl wtf u think fucking someone asleep isnt rape?I think that if you can prove that they
1. Liked it
or
2. Were unconcious (it doesn't count if they were asleep)
Then it shouldn't be counted as rape. But legally I would agree with you
If they are unconscious they probably won't even know they got raped so it doesn't count. No harm no foul. (assuming they don't get pregnant)jfl wtf u think fucking someone asleep isnt rape?
ur thoughts dont matter and are not consent.View attachment 970781
u could use that to justify cheating, lying, murder, and a lot of other shit. It's their body, they're just in a state of temporary rest, they can still wake up. It's not like they're dead. It's wrong cuz they did something to ur property (body) without consenting.If they are unconscious they probably won't even know they got raped so it doesn't count. No harm no foul. (assuming they don't get pregnant)
murder
cheating
It's wrong cuz they did something to ur property (body) without consenting.
does it mean if I want it its right?Hey don't you ugh me. We all know that if eva was unconscious and no harm would be caused to her you would be the first one to fuck her.
could be lying to someone, making them a slave
Lying to them and making them a slave would be causing them harm so I wouldn't justify it.My logic is just: If something causes 0 harm then it can be justified.
they wouldnt know though, how will they be harmed if they dont know theyre being harmed?Lying to them and making them a slave would be causing them harm so I wouldn't justify it.
If they didn't know they were being made into a slave and 0 harm was caused then I would justify it.they wouldnt know though, how will they be harmed if they dont know theyre being harmed?
ur logic is being inconsistent