Idaho professor says women should be kept out engineering, medicine and law, doesn't get cancelled

[AlexAP]

“Young men must be respectable and responsible to inspire young women to be secure with feminine goals of homemaking and having children,” he told the crowd. “Every effort must be made not to recruit women into engineering, but rather to recruit and demand more of men who become engineers. Ditto for med school, and the law, and every trade,” he said.

He also expressed nostalgia for the time when “women used to have many children when the odds of dying in childbirth were actually very high,” apparently lamenting the availability of birth control. Yenor has not yet commented publicly on the uproar over his comments, but after video of his speech went viral, he reshared it on Twitter and doubled down on his stance, writing that “our independent women are more medicated, meddlesome, and quarrelsome than women need to be.”

While some students have called on the university to take action against the professor, a spokesperson for Boise State made clear in comments to the Statesman that Yenor will not face consequences.

Prof: Keep Women Out of Medicine, Engineering, and Law

A political-science professor is under fire after declaring that “independent women” are a threat to society and should stick to “feminine goals.”

www.thedailybeast.com

I disagree with what he said, but it's a good thing that he didn't get cancelled.

 

[Yliaster]

Women don't deliberately go into Engineering regardless lmao.

 

[AlexAP]

Women don't deliberately go into Engineering regardless lmao.

Yeah, the numbers are still too high for this professor.

I think women don't want to be associated with nerds, so they won't flock to engineering. It's like men not wanting to be nurses because it's seen as a feminine thing.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I disagree with what he said, but it's a good thing that he didn't get cancelled.

Would you ever trust a woman doctor to give you LL or a lefort 3?



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[sytyl]

I think that for fields like healthcare, especially physicians - there should be a contract that basically says you will work full time for X years after graduation. There are too many women (men too, but mostly women), who go into med school here (usually a 50/50 split between male/female) and then once finishing, work part time for the rest of their lives - it becomes a problem of the state investing in resources to educate somebody (give them a seat at a medical school) but then said person not paying it back by way of working full time.

Japan had a controversy in the past years where female scores for admissions to one of the top medical schools were deliberately lowered so that fewer of them would get in for these reasons.

What do you think Alex?

It's certainly an affront to freedom to demand somebody work for X years full time after graduating, but it's also pragmatic and would solve many of the issues facing healthcare systems today.

 

[SLA]

Incredibly based. Women belong in the home, and it is not a lesser, but GREATER role. It is their God-given duty, serving the Lord through the family. Childbirth is how the Savior came, it is the love a woman has for God to birth.

 

[AlexAP]

Would you ever trust a woman doctor to give you LL or a lefort 3?

I wouldn't do LL or lefort 3, but I would trust them with other surgeries if I need them.

 

[AlexAP]

Incredibly based. Women belong in the home, and it is not a lesser, but GREATER role. It is their God-given duty, serving the Lord through the family. Childbirth is how the Savior came, it is the love a woman has for God to birth.

Gigacope, God doesn't exist, women always worked outside home (only upper class families could afford stay-at-home moms) and there's nothing bad with female doctors, lawyers and engineers if they're qualified.

 

[CupOfCoffee]

But I want a sugar mommy engineer girl

 

[AlexAP]

I think that for fields like healthcare, especially physicians - there should be a contract that basically says you will work full time for X years after graduation. There are too many women (men too, but mostly women), who go into med school here (usually a 50/50 split between male/female) and then once finishing, work part time for the rest of their lives - it becomes a problem of the state investing in resources to educate somebody (give them a seat at a medical school) but then said person not paying it back by way of working full time.

Japan had a controversy in the past years where female scores for admissions to one of the top medical schools were deliberately lowered so that fewer of them would get in for these reasons.

What do you think Alex?

It's certainly an affront to freedom to demand somebody work for X years full time after graduating, but it's also pragmatic and would solve many of the issues facing healthcare systems today.

I think there must be a deregulation, not everyone who wants to work in some medical profession should need to go to med school and you should be able to enter it without having a college degree. Then the costs for training medical professionals would be lower.

 

[Cali Yuga]

“Young men must be respectable and responsible to inspire young women to be secure with feminine goals of homemaking and having children,” he told the crowd. “Every effort must be made not to recruit women into engineering, but rather to recruit and demand more of men who become engineers. Ditto for med school, and the law, and every trade,” he said.

He also expressed nostalgia for the time when “women used to have many children when the odds of dying in childbirth were actually very high,” apparently lamenting the availability of birth control. Yenor has not yet commented publicly on the uproar over his comments, but after video of his speech went viral, he reshared it on Twitter and doubled down on his stance, writing that “our independent women are more medicated, meddlesome, and quarrelsome than women need to be.”

While some students have called on the university to take action against the professor, a spokesperson for Boise State made clear in comments to the Statesman that Yenor will not face consequences.

Prof: Keep Women Out of Medicine, Engineering, and Law

A political-science professor is under fire after declaring that “independent women” are a threat to society and should stick to “feminine goals.”

www.thedailybeast.com

I disagree with what he said, but it's a good thing that he didn't get cancelled.

based as hell

reminds me of this point molyneux made at some point that when as a society you use your scarce resources to train women in highly critical fields like engineering you only get a fraction of the utility that you would get from training a man because women dont work as many hours, quit earlier, and take huge chunks of time off for maternity, etc.

so like if you had the capacity to train 1,000 engineers from a pure efficiency standpoint youd want to train 1000 men as every woman you train is going to have the expected value of a nonzero amount less than a man i.e. if ou trained 500 men and 500 women you end up with like 900 effective engineers

its also insanely dysgenic to take the most intelligent and conscientious women (those capable of becoming engineers int eh first place) out of the dating/reproductive marketplace for their prime child bearing years to train them. Big part of the reason why we have such a downward trend in intelligence since women were 'empowered'

womens rights was the greatest self own any society ever perpetrated on itself