Ideal blonde

Gengar said:
She has those crazy eyes that some slootty foids have.

And lol, I didn’t get to charge my phone yet. My sleeping schedule is way off. I’ve been waking up at 8:30 PM. :feelswhy:
Click to expand...
I'll punch your fucking paki face in :feelswhat:

YOu just have to check it soon, we are planning something
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar and iblamexyz
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz
Volksstaffel said:
I'll punch your fucking paki face in :feelswhat:

YOu just have to check it soon, we are planning something
Click to expand...
Slow down whiteboi! :ogre:

I’ll charge it tomorrow, mkay?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel and iblamexyz
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel and iblamexyz
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamexyz and Gengar
Volksstaffel said:
I would fucking kill you both if you said that to my face
Click to expand...


bro imagine she walked around your house dressed like this

@Tigermoggerlol @Jager @emogymmaxx
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Jager, Just Blast, Tigermoggerlol and 2 others
iblamexyz said:


bro imagine she walked around your house dressed like this

@Tigermoggerlol @Jager @emogymmaxx
Click to expand...

“Astagfirullah. Dress up, or you’ll get another thousand lashings.”

That’s what I’d say. :feelsautistic:
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: surgerymaxxingsoon and iblamexyz
Gengar said:
“Astagfirullah. Dress up, or you’ll get another thousand lashings.”

That’s what I’d say. :feelsautistic:
Click to expand...
that's why your an incel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar
iblamexyz said:


bro imagine she walked around your house dressed like this

@Tigermoggerlol @Jager @emogymmaxx
Click to expand...

I genuinely like her tan it’s cute
 
  • Love it
Reactions: iblamexyz
Gengar said:
“Astagfirullah. Dress up, or you’ll get another thousand lashings.”

That’s what I’d say. :feelsautistic:
Click to expand...
I gotta lock in mb
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and iblamexyz
Gengar said:
“Astagfirullah. Dress up, or you’ll get another thousand lashings.”

That’s what I’d say. :feelsautistic:
Click to expand...
Stone to death or neutered
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Gengar
iblamexyz said:


bro imagine she walked around your house dressed like this

@Tigermoggerlol @Jager @emogymmaxx
Click to expand...

I would hug her from behind and put my hands under her shorts to finger her pussy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser and iblamexyz
Tigermoggerlol said:
I would hug her from behind
Click to expand...
I was going to agree with you before it got to sexual but I agree but she would look hot asf walking thru my house dressed like this
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol
this is water, no clue what is trying to be implied.

iblamexyz said:
it's such a normie thing to say ''muh I never said looks don't matter''
Click to expand...

your argument is basically "you wouldn't date a 10/10 personality if she was hideous and therefore looks matter more" / "you wouldn't even give the chance to date to a sub human so looks matter more"

i never claimed i would, just like i wouldn't date a stacy if her personality was terrible. you're making the implications for me. this argument also doesn't contradict the original statment that personality matters more in a LTR.

let A = "i think personality is more important than physical attraction"
let B = "i would date someone who’s unattractive but has a good personality"
let C = "i would date a stacy with a bad personality"

A ↛ B and A ↛ ¬C. saying personality matters more doesn’t mean attraction becomes irrelevant, it just means that once a minimum threshold of attraction exists, personality becomes the deciding factor.

the “you’d give more leeway to a stacy than a subhuman” argument is also flawed. higher attraction might make someone more initially tolerant, but that tolerance collapses fast after being with them for 6 months. have you had a girl before? you don't sit around glazing them at the 5th year mark for no reason

the only thing being stated is that personality determines whether the relationship works out or not, meaning the relationship has already started and the minimum attraction threshold has already been met. this is literally common sense & you're calling it "bluepill cope"

the only thing being implied is that you would stay a cuck for a stacy. none of this contradicts the basics of bp
 
  • +1
Reactions: #RedditAdviceVictim and iblamexyz
iblamexyz said:
I was going to agree with you before it got to sexual but I agree but she would look hot asf walking thru my house dressed like this
Click to expand...
Nah fr tho shit would be fire
 
  • Love it
Reactions: iblamexyz
iblamexyz said:


bro imagine she walked around your house dressed like this

@Tigermoggerlol @Jager @emogymmaxx
Click to expand...

i have a girlfriend she wouldnt be in my house
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz
topology said:
this is water, no clue what is trying to be implied.



your argument is basically "you wouldn't date a 10/10 personality if she was hideous and therefore looks matter more" / "you wouldn't even give the chance to date to a sub human so looks matter more"

i never claimed i would, just like i wouldn't date a stacy if her personality was terrible. you're making the implications for me. this argument also doesn't contradict the original statment that personality matters more in a LTR.

let A = "i think personality is more important than physical attraction"
let B = "i would date someone who’s unattractive but has a good personality"
let C = "i would date a stacy with a bad personality"

A ↛ B and A ↛ ¬C. saying personality matters more doesn’t mean attraction becomes irrelevant, it just means that once a minimum threshold of attraction exists, personality becomes the deciding factor.

the “you’d give more leeway to a stacy than a subhuman” argument is also flawed. higher attraction might make someone more initially tolerant, but that tolerance collapses fast after being with them for 6 months. have you had a girl before? you don't sit around glazing them at the 5th year mark for no reason

the only thing being stated is that personality determines whether the relationship works out or not, meaning the relationship has already started and the minimum attraction threshold has already been met. this is literally common sense & you're calling it "bluepill cope"

the only thing being implied is that you would stay a cuck for a stacy. none of this contradicts the basics of bp
Click to expand...
okay nice thread? mirin the effort

Iq is linked to attractiveness without this turning into a monologue

have you talked to attractive person? 9 times out 10 those people have good socials skills due to them being included in socials events and due to the social events > social skills which than transfers into hobbies

9 out 10 an attractive person already has a good personality

don't believe me? here's a study https://www.drgeorgesimon.com/mista...avitate toward folks,necessarily a sign of it.

everyone naturally wants to be around attractive people thus them having a better personality

this is a core principle of the bp
 
  • +1
Reactions: topology
iblamexyz said:
our little comedian
Click to expand...
nooooo
You Have Mail Penguin GIF by Zypto
 
  • JFL
Reactions: surgerymaxxingsoon and iblamexyz
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Tigermoggerlol and surgerymaxxingsoon
she is ugly
 
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamexyz
iblamexyz said:
everyone naturally wants to be around attractive people thus them having a better personality
Click to expand...
that's just the halo effect, which usually fades after about six months, roughly the same timeframe as the honeymoon phase. once familiarity sets in, the illusion breaks, and you start seeing the person for who they actually are.

iblamexyz said:
have you talked to attractive person? 9 times out 10 those people have good socials skills due to them being included in socials events and due to the social events > social skills which than transfers into hobbies
Click to expand...
yes & this is just good social skills which is not reflective of their personality.

--

they don't actually have a better personality necessarily so the argument is once again flawed

attractive people obviously get more attention, but that just leads into my main point:

topology said:
the “you’d give more leeway to a stacy than a subhuman” argument is also flawed. higher attraction might make someone more initially tolerant, but that tolerance collapses fast after being with them for 6 months. have you had a girl before? you don't sit around glazing them at the 5th year mark for no reason

the only thing being stated is that personality determines whether the relationship works out or not, meaning the relationship has already started and the minimum attraction threshold has already been met. this is literally common sense & you're calling it "bluepill cope"
Click to expand...

this is a biological process. you get normalized to people after a while, which leads to boredom. was it you or someone else who said they never had a girlfriend? every single person i've seen has said they got bored or normalized to their girlfriend's looks, literally the definition of the honeymoon phase.

i don't want some mentally ill girl with a chad as a counterexample to what i said. they're a small minority and don't represent individuals with an iq over 90
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz
topology said:
that's just the halo effect, which usually fades after about six months, roughly the same timeframe as the honeymoon phase. once familiarity sets in, the illusion breaks, and you start seeing the person for who they actually are.


yes & this is just good social skills which is not reflective of their personality.

--

they don't actually have a better personality necessarily so the argument is once again flawed

attractive people obviously get more attention, but that just leads into my main point:



this is a biological process. you get normalized to people after a while, which leads to boredom. was it you or someone else who said they never had a girlfriend? every single person i've seen has said they got bored or normalized to their girlfriend's looks, literally the definition of the honeymoon phase.

i don't want some mentally ill girl with a chad as a counterexample to what i said. they're a small minority and don't represent individuals with an iq over 90
Click to expand...
so you asked bluepill normies where they said nt things JFL

also halo effect doesn't fade, honestly this again a bluepill argument on a blackpill forum

if you genuinely don't think that attractive people don't have a better personality clearly you haven't interacted with enough attractive people
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: topology
iblamexyz said:
also halo effect doesn't fade, honestly this again a bluepill argument on a blackpill forum
Click to expand...
have you ever had a girlfriend?

--

there is strong biological & psychological evidence that humans are predisposed to get normalized to people over time, especially in romantic and sexual contexts

--

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Hormones and the Coolidge effect - PubMed

The Coolidge effect is the renewal of sexual behavior after the presentation of a novel sexual partner and possibly occurs as the result of habituation and dishabituation processes. This re-motivation to copulate is well studied in males and is commonly related to sexual satiety, which involves...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Change in Physical Attraction in Early Romantic Relationships| Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships

interpersona.psychopen.eu interpersona.psychopen.eu

Sex Differences in the Implications of Partner Physical Attractiveness for the Trajectory of Marital Satisfaction - PMC

Do men value physical attractiveness in a mate more than women? Scientists in numerous disciplines believe that they do, but recent research using speed-dating paradigms suggests that males and females are equally influenced by physical ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Stability and Change of Individual Differences in Ideal Partner Preferences Over 13 Years - PMC

Ideal partner preferences for traits in a partner are said to be stable cognitive constructs. However, longitudinal studies investigating the same participants’ ideals repeatedly have so far been limited to relatively short retest intervals of a ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

all of these show strong signs of lowered interest based on how long you've been with your partner. all had a decent sample size & combined are a large population. some are based on sex while other on just attractiveness.

--

sure you can claim "but what if it's different with attractive people?" but initial attractiveness doesn't protect against habituation, high partner attractiveness doesn't guarntee long-term satisfaction, there's brain evidence going against what you said, etc.

also, halo effect is not only with attractive people. it can be done to sub humans hypothetically. it's just cognitive perception and not reality

--

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for the trajectory of marital satisfaction - PubMed

Do men value physical attractiveness in a mate more than women? Scientists in numerous disciplines believe that they do, but recent research using speed-dating paradigms suggests that males and females are equally influenced by physical attractiveness when choosing potential mates. Nevertheless...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

this shows that the difference between attractive and non attractive males is minimal relationship wise after 4 years.

--

www.frontiersin.org

Frontiers | After the Honeymoon: Neural and Genetic Correlates of Romantic Love in Newlywed Marriages

Romantic love is associated with relationship satisfaction, stability, and individual well-being. For many couples, romantic love also motivates marriage. An...
www.frontiersin.org www.frontiersin.org

study on brain activity with partners, backing my claim.

--

https://www.researchgate.net/public...hips_Evidence_From_a_Large_Longitudinal_Study

people are treated differently as time goes on, for the worse. large majority of relationships also have the halo effect before that is said.

--

it physically cannot be cope if science backs it up

sorry for bad formatting i'm really tired
 
  • +1
Reactions: #RedditAdviceVictim and iblamexyz
iblamexyz said:
if you genuinely don't think that attractive people don't have a better personality clearly you haven't interacted with enough attractive people
Click to expand...
once again, attractive people have the perception of having a good personality. it does not imply that they do or they don't. it's purely cause of the halo effect, like you said, which i have shown goes away after 6-24 months
 
  • +1
Reactions: #RedditAdviceVictim and iblamexyz
topology said:
once again, attractive people have the perception of having a good personality. it does not imply that they do or they don't. it's purely cause of the halo effect, like you said, which i have shown goes away after 6-24 months
Click to expand...
I don't even know what your point is anymore :feelskek:

I'll read the study's
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: topology
iblamexyz said:
I don't even know what your point is anymore :feelskek:

muh goes away in which time? according to what? according to who?
Click to expand...
i just attached like 15 studies mate, look at the post above
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz
topology said:
you're good. read the studies and respond when you want, i'm going to take a shower
Click to expand...
fyi I didn't read all study you sent since it would take me all day, I just used gpt to give me a summary

but the study which you sent me either are completely irrelevant to the topic of personality

or you not accounting for other bp things like

JBW, betabux, oofy doofy

things like this and clues like this are missing

we don't know the nature of their relationships

therefore I don't know how they live and actually operate day by day/live

you also didn't take into account the:

The Hawthorne effect

that being said if I was to do a study like this and someone to ask some some bluepill questions about my marriage 9/10 I would lie and so would they

eg, how often do you have sex if I was in a deadbedroom

I wouldn't just say oh my wife doesn't sleep with me anymore

I would say once a month or some other bs:feelskek:​
 
  • +1
Reactions: topology
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel and iblamexyz
@Glorious King check out my new thread me and tml rly like her

even would do a 3some wth her
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Glorious King
iblamexyz said:
@Glorious King check out my new thread me and tml rly like her

even would do a 3some wth her
Click to expand...
nahh what's up with dude tryna do 3sum with everyone :feelskek:
1762488756689
 
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamexyz
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JordanFagget271
dimo is subjective yap/IM CHANGING AVI!?
Replies
30
Views
120
Tigermoggerlol
Tigermoggerlol
decadouche57
Discussion Is it ethical to recommend OBO unless the IPD is really bad?
Replies
2
Views
86
enchanted_elixir
enchanted_elixir
possiblysub2
What is ideal height percentile?
Replies
1
Views
124
ConfusedBolivian
ConfusedBolivian
L
The ideal height for attractiveness
Replies
3
Views
111
shmool
shmool
lalalanotlistening
Discussion aging taking your natural blonde hair away is so tragic
Replies
11
Views
106
HundredManSlayer
HundredManSlayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top