Ideal esr/IPD

[Anakin_10k]

just a question what is the ideal esr/ipd range cuz on old formula such as CA's formula its 44,5-47,7 but on faceiq one for ex its more open its around 45-48 also what tier would be considered a 49,2 ipd is it a big flaw / is it deadly just want yall opinion guys

 

[cortisolman2]

just a question what is the ideal esr/ipd range cuz on old formula such as CA's formula its 44,5-47,7 but on faceiq one for ex its more open its around 45-48 also what tier would be considered a 49,2 ipd is it a big flaw / is it deadly just want yall opinion guys

ideal is bout 46 but 49 is not bad its a flaw but not too noticble

 

[masai jumps enjoyer]

just a question what is the ideal esr/ipd range cuz on old formula such as CA's formula its 44,5-47,7 but on faceiq one for ex its more open its around 45-48 also what tier would be considered a 49,2 ipd is it a big flaw / is it deadly just want yall opinion guys

a slightly wider esr (48-49) is actually a trait a lot of models have, looks striking and is a halo provided you have good bones and eye area, failo else

 

[Anakin_10k]

a slightly wider esr (48-49) is actually a trait a lot of models have, looks striking and is a halo provided you have good bones and eye area, failo else

vito / oliver o connor / ehren have wide set eyes too but still manage to be attractive to ur right

 

[thanks]

vito / oliver o connor / ehren have wide set eyes too but still manage to be attractive to ur right

only if you have a long pfl

otherwise it looks like shit imo

 

[Anakin_10k]

only if you have a long pfl

otherwise it looks like shit imo

like mine is 21% of the zygomatic width ive seen on sum video it is ideal

 

[masai jumps enjoyer]

only if you have a long pfl

otherwise it looks like shit imo

true

 

[Adee]

0.455-0.47 is the sweet spot for males
0.465-0.48 for females

 

[Anakin_10k]

View attachment 4824491


0.455-0.47 is the sweet spot for males
0.465-0.48 for females

yes but ppl say creative attractivness is outdeated and somehow 49 is not as bad on recent formula

 

[Adee]

yes but ppl say creative attractivness is outdeated and somehow 49 is not as bad on recent formula

It all depends on the IPD, esr of .49 might look good on few females = t1,t2 , but on others with visibly too wide set eyes it might look horribe = t3, t4
But yes generally when I used to calculate harmony I used completely different formula for ESR.
pretty sure T1 for males was .446-.48 and .46-48.8 for females

 

[Anakin_10k]

It all depends on the IPD, esr of .49 might look good on few females = t1,t2 , but on others with visibly too wide set eyes it might look horribe = t3, t4
But yes generally when I used to calculate harmony I used completely different formula for ESR.
pretty sure T1 for males was .446-.48 and .46-48.8 for females

also your thought abt it being the most important ratio do u think it is actually true?

 

[Adee]

also your thought abt it being the most important ratio do u think it is actually true?

Definitely one of the most important
ESR, IPD, FWHR, Bigonial Width matter the most
I don't think there is a most important ratio