Ideal FWHR shouldnt be 2.00

Mercurius

Mercurius

Bound by perfectionism
Joined
Sep 6, 2025
Posts
915
Reputation
1,130
Ive been doing alot of facial analysis on well known chads recently and i noticed most are pretty far below the ''ideal FWHR known as 1.96-2.00

The ideal should be around 1.86-1.94 IMO

look at people like matt bomer (1.86) , jon erik hexum (1.89) , alain delon (1.86) , david gandy (1.85), hernan (1.94), cameron alborzian (1.85)

their FWHR looks better than people with a 2.00 FWHR
 
  • +1
Reactions: wonderful141 and Niebvll
their FWHR looks better than people with a 2.00 FWHR
it's because they are chads with 80 percent harmony not because of their fhwr, give me 1.86-2.00 fwhr and i still would look like absolute shit, it's never about one thing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: wonderful141, Niebvll, shivwr and 4 others
Ive been doing alot of facial analysis on well known chads recently and i noticed most are pretty far below the ''ideal FWHR known as 1.96-2.00

The ideal should be around 1.86-1.94 IMO

look at people like matt bomer (1.86) , jon erik hexum (1.89) , alain delon (1.86) , david gandy (1.85), hernan (1.94), cameron alborzian (1.85)

their FWHR looks better than people with a 2.00 FWHR
Facts 2.0 is too blocky and kills the harmony. High 1.8s is the real sweet spot for that sleek model look. 2.0 is just overhyped cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clayed.nas and Mercurius
it's because they are chads with 80 percent harmony not because of their fhwr, give me 1.86-2.00 fwhr and i still would look like absolute shit, it's never about one thing.
FWHR is one of the most important ratios though

other than ESR, IPD

they would look worse with a 2.00 fwhr
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: uglyretardednigga
Facts 2.0 is too blocky and kills the harmony. High 1.8s is the real sweet spot for that sleek model look. 2.0 is just overhyped cope
Yep, exactly

IMO alain delon has the perfect face shape and his fwhr is only 1.86
 
  • +1
Reactions: Niebvll
Yep, exactly

IMO alain delon has the perfect face shape and his fwhr is only 1.86
alain delon is the blueprint. the 1.86 ratio gives that dimorphism without looking like a minecraft character. harmony always beats raw width fss
 
  • +1
Reactions: Niebvll and Mercurius
False analogy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mercurius
Is 1.9 good?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mercurius
Ive been doing alot of facial analysis on well known chads recently and i noticed most are pretty far below the ''ideal FWHR known as 1.96-2.00

The ideal should be around 1.86-1.94 IMO

look at people like matt bomer (1.86) , jon erik hexum (1.89) , alain delon (1.86) , david gandy (1.85), hernan (1.94), cameron alborzian (1.85)

their FWHR looks better than people with a 2.00 FWHR
not sure if cameron fwhr is 1.85:unsure:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mercurius
not sure if cameron fwhr is 1.85:unsure:
His FWHR is 1.81 in this pic, even worse
IMG 1638

Its 1.85 in this pic

IMG 1639
 
1.93 mogs

same with height

193cm
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mercurius
Ive been doing alot of facial analysis on well known chads recently and i noticed most are pretty far below the ''ideal FWHR known as 1.96-2.00

The ideal should be around 1.86-1.94 IMO

look at people like matt bomer (1.86) , jon erik hexum (1.89) , alain delon (1.86) , david gandy (1.85), hernan (1.94), cameron alborzian (1.85)

their FWHR looks better than people with a 2.00 FWHR
1.7 good?
 
Will puberty solve the problem? I'm 15.
if you optimise your puberty then maybe

it wont increase that much though

also it depends on what picture you used to measure ur ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: reda2010
is 1.83 chill its not ideal but is it a huge flaw
 

Similar threads

Azie555
Replies
3
Views
109
Azie555
Azie555
Azie555
Replies
55
Views
421
mtn_dude_193
mtn_dude_193
dragovoicemaxxer1.7
Looksmax fixing fwhr
Replies
0
Views
54
dragovoicemaxxer1.7
dragovoicemaxxer1.7
Azie555
Replies
4
Views
73
mtn_dude_193
mtn_dude_193
sentientblockz
Replies
11
Views
74
FarhanHere
FarhanHere

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →