Ideal fWHR

[bolor]

Is there an ideal measure?

I used this online fHWR calculator to calculate David Gandy, and although it doesn't measure correctly, I guess it would be around 1.8 , which is the average among men, am I right?

Ps: The calculator gives 1.6, because it draws the line above the eyebrows, instead of below it. So I think the right would be about 1.8.

So, is a bigger measure, closer to 2 better, or not necessarily?

 

[goat2x]

1.8-2.0 is ideal

 

[Deleted member 2729]

Link to calculator?

 

[HighIQcel]

Link to calculator?

 

[Deleted member 5349]

fWHR should be talked about more here. All the HS/college slayers have rly wide masculine faces. Keep coping with “muh eye area”

 

[kuroro]

2

 

[DrTony]

fWHR should be talked about more here. All the HS/college slayers have rly wide masculine faces. Keep coping with “muh eye area”

fWHR should be talked less.

 

[bolor]

Link to calculator?

FWHR Calculator App

 

[TsarTsar444]

I forgot this place was a looksmaxer forun jfl

 

[JamesHowlett]

fWHR should be talked about more here. All the HS/college slayers have rly wide masculine faces. Keep coping with “muh eye area”

Eye area matters just as much as FWHR

 

[spark]

Is there an ideal measure?

I used this online fHWR calculator to calculate David Gandy, and although it doesn't measure correctly, I guess it would be around 1.8 , which is the average among men, am I right?

Ps: The calculator gives 1.6, because it draws the line above the eyebrows, instead of below it. So I think the right would be about 1.8.

So, is a bigger measure, closer to 2 better, or not necessarily?

It's a shit calculator. Gandy has the fwhr of abour 1.9

 

[Patrick Baitman]

It's a shit calculator. Gandy has the fwhr of abour 1.9

1.83 actually

 

[spark]

1.83 actually
View attachment 492223

I count the top of the upper orbital instead of the middle of eyebrows.

 

[Patrick Baitman]

I count the top of the upper orbital instead of the middle of eyebrows.

Wouldn't really make a difference tbh

 

[Patrick Baitman]

I count the top of the upper orbital instead of the middle of eyebrows.

Btw, I took the measurement from the sub orbital, even if it may not look like it

 

[spark]

Wouldn't really make a difference tbh

even a tiny bit of a difference could turn the low 1.80s result into a high 1.80s result

 

[Patrick Baitman]

even a tiny bit of a difference could turn the low 1.80s result into a high 1.80s result

It'll only make a difference if you're high on autism spectrum. Irl nobody can tell apart 1.83 from 1.87 you fucking autist

 

[spark]

It'll only make a difference if you're high on autism spectrum. Irl nobody can tell apart 1.83 from 1.87 you fucking autist

Then why would you correct my number to only a slightly lower one by calculating pixels in a photo you fucking autist?

 

[AutisticBeaner]

high fwhr is just a result of good development, that's why people with a higher fwhr generally look better. idk if it on it's own really is that big of a deal.

 

[Chadlitecel]

Eye area matters just as much as FWHR

If you have a good fwhr and a Wide face usually you have also wide orbitals and a Wide jaw. This is why jordan barrett looks like a predatot