Ideal penis size study analysis + data correction

I doubt women have the mental capacity to extract usefull information from through experiments like these.

Everyone knows bigger dicks are better, everyone knows girls that have boasted about their lover's big dick, everyone knows girls that make fun of smalldicks, everyone that has sent dickpics knows that girls want your dick to be big, everyone knows girls like big bulges on guys, and the list goes fucking on.
Small dicks are not enjoyable for most women, that is evident. But what you are saying is basically that women prefer big dicks regarding the visual aspect, because they look more impressive to them, and also a status boost if their boyfriend has a bigger dick than her girlfriends' BFs, something they can brag about in front of other foids and make their jealous. But what size they prefer inside their vaginas, that is another question, and I am not sure that most women prefer big. I am not a slayer but in my experience 6 inch dick is enough to fuck any foid so hard they can't walk after that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard
Idk inches, it's between 17.6 and 18.3cm, but again i could never get it rock hard when trying to measure it cuz i always did it when i wasnt in a mood really so forcefully fapped and immediately when i got the ruler it got softer. Never really measured it rock hard tho
im saying if you were 17.5cm bonepressed or whatever, would you still have a problem, like could you use all of it then or would it still be a problem? because 7 inches is 17,74cm and i want to see if it makes a difference. how much shorter would it have to be for you to face no problems at all?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: TsarTsar444
im saying if you were 17.5cm bonepressed or whatever, would you still have a problem, like could you use all of it then or would it still be a problem? because 7 inches is 17,74cm and i want to see if it makes a difference. how much shorter would it have to be for you to face no problems at all?
I thought it was 18cm?? Jfl once measured 18.3cm thats like 7.3, maybe thats why it hurted her, it was rock solid. Idk tbh, i just dont go all deep if i want to not hurt her
 
I thought it was 18cm?? Jfl once measured 18.3cm thats like 7.3, maybe thats why it hurted her, it was rock solid. Idk tbh, i just dont go all deep if i want to not hurt her
no lol 18cm is 7.1" bp (rounded up from 7.086" -> 7.1") and yeah everyone says at 7" bp (17,78cm) you hit the cervix so i was wondering if it was the same for 6.9" bp (17,52cm) and 6.8" bp (17,27cm)
 
  • +1
Reactions: delusionalretard and TsarTsar444
no lol 18cm is 7.1" bp (rounded up from 7.086" -> 7.1") and yeah everyone says at 7" bp (17,78cm) you hit the cervix so i was wondering if it was the same for 6.9" bp (17,52cm) and 6.8" bp (17,27cm)
Idk man, the only thing i know is that size isnt everything unironically, cause i gave her the most orgasms when i put it only 2/3 in, the trick is to hit her upper wall during missionary, thats where the bigger clitoric body is at
 
Idk man, the only thing i know is that size isnt everything unironically, cause i gave her the most orgasms when i put it only 2/3 in, the trick is to hit her upper wall during missionary, thats where the bigger clitoric body is at
imagine giving sex tips to a truecel :feelskek: anyway whats your girth then? chances are either you have enough girth or she wasnt aroused enough for you to hit that wall
 
imagine giving sex tips to a truecel :feelskek: anyway whats your girth then? chances are either you have enough girth or she wasnt aroused enough for you to hit that wall
Wdym? I do hit the wall jfl, but it just hurts her alot. My girth is 5 inches
 
Wdym? I do hit the wall jfl, but it just hurts her alot. My girth is 5 inches
i read that the wall can extend depending on her arousal level, meaning the more aroused she is the higher up it goes and thus it becomes difficult to hit. think back to the 2/3rd cock inside moment (jfl at the way i said that), was it during the beginning of the session? if so then it makes sense.
 
whats 6'11"?? lol it goes up to 6.9 and then comes 7.0. so you can say with a guarantee its 7.1bp? if it was lets say... 6.8bp or 6.9bp would you still have the same problem??
He thought it was like height with foot and inches :feelskek:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Michael Myers
We dont use inches in europe
true jfl we use cm here. i dont have to worry about dick stuff cuz not only do i never get to use it, my stats are okay too
 
ideal length none bone pressed = 6.5-7.5 inches
ideal girth = 5.5-6
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beetlejuice
over for my 10x7?
 
yet 85% of users on this site claim to be 7x5 or more. Interesting.
Forum is huge outlier, prob everyone here jelqs or some shit, but yeah everyone is 7.5+ in length, same as everyone is 6'4''+.

Interesting thing here for me was the ONS Vs LTR, would foids openly admit to wanting bigger in ONS, and what is the reasons they want more there? Maybe cos they think smaller guy will not be fuckboi?

Also I suspect based on how small the increment was in ideal ONS Vs LTR, that MOST of the sample lied and said they want the same.
 
That's what I would say
7.5 NBL is fucking huge man, I think v few pornstars are that big, only guys like Mandingo, dredd, Lexington Steele are likely that big.

7.5 BPL is somewhat common, but I'd still say globally like less than 0.1% of guys are 7.5 BPL
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiroslavBulldosex
A legit unfrauded 7x5.5 is already really rare and many pornstars aren’t bigger than that. So I don’t think this study is cope
meanwhile everyone here claims 8x6 penis :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: germanlooks
I want a massive penis
 
A pretty good study regarding the ideal penis size has been conducted a few years ago.
Here it is if you want to check it out in full:


Analysis

Here are the demographics of the participants that were selected to be part of the study:

"All participants (N = 75) were screened to report sexual attraction to men, and ranged in age from 18 to 65. They were California residents, mostly white or Asian, sexually experienced, currently in a sexual relationship, and had sex recently (see Table 1). Twenty-seven percent of women reported that they had ended a relationship due, in part, to a mismatch between their penis size preference and their partner’s penis size (see Table 1). More women cited that the penis was too small as a problem, rather than that the penis was too large."

These women had to select among 3D penis models (see picture) and select the ones that they thought were :
- the average penis size
- ideal for ONS
- ideal for LTR


View attachment 1293720

There were a total of 33 penis models to choose from (I will get back to this later):
View attachment 1293721


One interesting thing to note is that women accurately guessed the size of the penis models :

"Recall error was calculated as the difference of the dimension the participant chose minus the size of the actual sample."

"Most (N = 48) women selected the exactly correct model (in both length and circumference) at immediate recall (see Fig 5). About half (N = 31) of women selected exactly the correct model at delayed recall. There was a main effect of dimension predicting model selection error (F(1,73) = 11.6, p < .001, ηp 2 = .14): participants slightly underestimated penis length after the recall interval (M = -0.18 inches or -0.46 cm error), but were very accurate recalling penis circumference (M = 0.02 inches or 0.05 cm error). There was no main effect of delay nor dimension X delay interaction despite high power (f = .1, r = .9, 1-β = .97). Given the high accuracy, analyses for preferences were conducted as planned."


They estimated the average penis size at 5.76x4.5 inches, which is extremely close to the calcSD Western average (5.7x4.68).

The average ideal size for ONS was 6.41x4.97 and the average ideal size for LTR was 6.37x4.83.

40 of the 60 women who answered about their preferred size for ONS chose a penis that was 6.5 inches long or more, 24 of these 60 women chose a penis that was 5.5 inches thick or more.

We can see that the ideal penis size is already above the average, but there is more to it...


Data correction

The main problem with this study is the size of the penis models that they used, a lot of those sizes were unrealistic.

For example, if a woman wanted a penis that was 7 inches long she would have to chose between the model with 3.5 inches girth, the one with 5 inches girth and the one with 6 inches girth. A 7 inches long penis is 1.7 SD above the average while a 3.5 inches thick penis is 2 SD below the average. It's fair to assume that a man with a 7 inches long penis is not going to have 3.5 inches girth (and vice versa).

I decided to fix the data while using this method:

View attachment 1293725
For the cells coloured in light orange there was over a 2 SD difference between length and girth. If the length was overvalued, I deleted the girth data because it wasn't realistic nor was it useful to determine the ideal penis girth. If the girth was overvalued, I deleted the length data.

Here's how it looks like in practice:

You can see how the data for girth and length was deleted in some cells on the data correction sheets.

I decided to to the same but with a 1.5 SD max difference between length and girth (cells in orange) and with a 1 SD max difference (cells in red). In total there were 3 data corrections.

Here you can see how the final results are even higher:

View attachment 1293728

Feel free to discuss.
Dnr

Whats the ideal size?
 
Size ranking for ONS

Length: 6.5 >> 7.5 > 5.5 > 7 >> 5 > 4.5 > 8 > 6 >> 8.5 >> 4
Girth: 5.5 > 5 > 4 >> 4.5 > 6 >> 3.5 > 7 > 6.5 >> 3

You can visualize this data better here:
View attachment 1293828
I'm 6.3 x 5 inches so close to ideal penis. I fall short a little bit. But it's not death tier I guess. So that's good to know.
 

Similar threads

rc201
Replies
8
Views
952
Schizo Tappy
Schizo Tappy
betty
Replies
58
Views
4K
TheLooxMaxingKing
TheLooxMaxingKing
Rivers of Nihil
Replies
24
Views
1K
Paroxysm
Paroxysm
cryptt
Replies
53
Views
851
cryptt
cryptt

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top