ideal pfl according to science

homo_faber

homo_faber

i thought this was a looksmaxing forum
Joined
Oct 25, 2020
Posts
3,953
Reputation
5,949
is this study legit?

5MsPeMt.jpg


Measuring the palpebral fissure width reveals the following facts. The traditional method of measuring the palpebral fissure width (the horizontal length of the eye opening) differs from my method. Traditionally, a parallel line is drawn from the medial canthus. The palpebral fissure width is measured as the distance from the medial canthus to lateral canthus. As shown in Image 7, I hope the readers are aware that the way I measure the palpebral fissure width is different from the traditionally accepted method.


The palpebral fissure width is 24.81mm in Average Koreans, whereas it is 26.78mm and 28.1mm in attractive Koreans and attractive Asians, respectively. This shows that attractive faces have a greater palpebral fissure width. In other words, Asians tend to view that eye openings with a greater vertical length to be more beautiful. On the other hand, Caucasians or Blacks showed opposite trends in terms of palpebral fissure width. It was 28.94mm and 31.02mm in average Caucasians and Blacks, respectively, whereas it was 27.45mm and 28.58mm in attractive Caucasians and attractive Blacks, respectively. This shows that Caucasians and Blacks tend to find smaller palpebral fissure width to be more attractive.


dont know if that study was done on men or women
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Deleted member 10172, Clark69 and 5 others
in comparison:


lgQklqA.png

images

vujkD6c.png
 
  • +1
Reactions: owlofathena, Deleted member 7776 and Alexanderr
weird tbh but should take into account pfl / eye width ratio.
 
  • +1
Reactions: datboijj, 5'8manlet, Darkstrand and 2 others
Nice, now i just have to force dr. Sinn to increase my pfl by 3mm.
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: subhuman incel, Deleted member 4804, Warlow and 1 other person
weird tbh but should take into account pfl / eye width ratio.

agree but shouldnt it be pfl / eye height ratio? correct me if im wrong
 
  • +1
Reactions: 5'8manlet, Deleted member 7776 and Hightwolf
Nice, now i just have to force dr. Sinn to increase my pfl by 3mm.
are you 25mm with ruler as well bro? b/c iris method is awfully fishy for those with larger irise's
 
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution
To be fair, 1.5mm PFL aren't that much of a difference
 
are you 25mm with ruler as well bro? b/c iris method is awfully fishy for those with larger irise's

can you even measure it accurately with a ruler?
 
Can't read dn read
 
can you even measure it accurately with a ruler?
ruler, caliper, tape measure. The margin of error on each of those is no greater than 1-2 mm
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution
ratios matter more than absolute distances

=> compare pfl to the headwidth/ipd
 
Last edited:
I used calliper and got 31mm
But i must decrease pfh also to show whole potencial of wide pfl
Not to say 34mm are quite achievable and maybe I will try to increase it
 
Last edited:
in a similar manner to this i take it?
View attachment 761746
Yeah, i got same results with iris method and using ruler. 25.5mm around.
How? With lateral osteotomy and canthoplasty ?
Well i hope its not cope and Sinn actually can increase pfl. Ofc 3mm is huge but i would be content with 1.5-2mm. I tried to contact AleksVs because he claims to have it done and from this what he said he increased his IPD and PFL by significant amount, he went from 59mm to 65mm IPD. I hope he will respond to my pm while being online.
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: MaxillaIsEverything, Warlow and Deleted member 5385
Yeah, i got same results with iris method and using ruler. 25.5mm around.

Well i hope its not cope and Sinn actually can increase pfl. Ofc 3mm is huge but i would be content with 1.5-2mm. I tried to contact AleksVs because he claims to have it done and from this what he said he increased his IPD and PFL by significant amount, he went from 59mm to 65mm IPD. I hope he will respond to my pm while being online.
WTF what did he get he increase ipd by 6mm and pfl ?
Also he is from jsf?
 
Whats interesting is that although asians find a larger than asian average pfl attractive, and whites and blacks find a smaller than average pfl attractive, they all prefer approximately the the same length pfl. Seems to be yet another aspect of sexual attractiveness that all humans agree on, whether they realize it or not. Its interesting how we all have such similar sexual preferences for such minute differences like a few mm of pfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
ratios matter more than absolute distances

i actually think the pfl / pfh (palpebral fissure length / palpebral fissure height) is the ratio that matters

where did they measure the palpebral fissure height in these studies i wondered? at the lowest point of your lower eyelid?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
WTF what did he get he increase ipd by 6mm and pfl ?
Also he is from jsf?
He says that he got tripod osteotomy and modifed Lefort 3.

Also there were ppl from jsf contacting Sinn, he said he can widen ipd up to 6mm without doing OBO. It could be game changer for people with long midfaces. This + face widening with zygomatic + jaw osteotomy could help ppl a lot.
1603742671100
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Good_Little_Goy and Darkstrand
Whats interesting is that although asians find a larger than asian average pfl attractive, and whites and blacks find a smaller than average pfl attractive, they all prefer approximately the the same length pfl. Seems to be yet another aspect of sexual attractiveness that all humans agree on, whether they realize it or not. Its interesting how we all have such similar sexual preferences for such minute differences like a few mm of pfl

there seem to racial difference regarding pfl too if that post is correct

Blacks and Arabs have more protruded eyes on average, that's why their PFL is higher. Their eyes are less deep set than whites on average.


7305F547-18E0-46E6-B7D1-1B62E66CFA80.png


93E1AF0B-AFC6-4C8D-9A14-2820760B2BAC.jpeg


702C796A-5D66-4C87-870D-3AE680C63101.jpeg

34328E58-136E-4566-94B4-2A3FDBF11DD7.jpeg
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot
i actually think the pfl / pfh (palpebral fissure length / palpebral fissure height) is the ratio that matters

where did they measure the palpebral fissure height in these studies i wondered? at the lowest point of your lower eyelid?
yeah that obv matters too, but when you have a wider head, you'll have a wider pfl, so saying there is an optimal absolute pfl makes little sense
 
i actually think the pfl / pfh (palpebral fissure length / palpebral fissure height) is the ratio that matters

where did they measure the palpebral fissure height in these studies i wondered? at the lowest point of your lower eyelid?


guess this pfl / pfh ratio

5d17ab3c768b972e5a35d1a050bf7307.gif
 
yeah that obv matters too, but when you have a wider head, you'll have a wider pfl, so saying there is an optimal absolute pfl makes little sense
agree
 
He says that he got tripod osteotomy and modifed Lefort 3.

Also there were ppl from jsf contacting Sinn, he said he can widen ipd up to 6mm without doing OBO. It could be game changer for people with long midfaces. This + face widening with zygomatic + jaw osteotomy could help ppl a lot.
View attachment 761770
Lifefuel but i personally to top tier pfl I lack 2-3mm and to top tier ipd 2mm (I have 66)
 
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution
Lifefuel but i personally to top tier pfl I lack 2-3mm and to top tier ipd 2mm (I have 66)
Well we are on two different planets. My ipd is like 58mm and my PFL is 25.5mm. I would be really happy with 62-3mm ipd and 27-27.5mm pfl. Ofc it just discussion, but if its actually possible then may be in future. Depends on costs, AleksVs said he used his college loan on his surgeries so i bet he didnt pay some giant amount of money,
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5385
My PFL is like 31mm and my eyes still look kinda small. My vertical eye length is 10mm
 
Never seen a pfl too big. Models have higher pfl than these averages
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670, RAITEIII, Darkstrand and 1 other person
Dude I got 35mm maybe after orbital decompression it will improve man.
 
Never seen a pfl too big. Models have higher pfl than these averages
Still trying to find out Eriksen PFL. His is the best
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670, Darkstrand and Lux
Well we are on two different planets. My ipd is like 58mm and my PFL is 25.5mm. I would be really happy with 62-3mm ipd and 27-27.5mm pfl. Ofc it just discussion, but if its actually possible then may be in future. Depends on costs, AleksVs said he used his college loan on his surgeries so i bet he didnt pay some giant amount of money,

lifefuel. do you have any link to where AleksVs reported all of this? and probably no pics of this before after right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: jflsnowdzz
lifefuel. do you have any link to where AleksVs reported all of this? and probably no pics of this before after right?
go through his post history, no B/A but i completely understand him, imagine posting your B/A so normies would mock him for being mentally ill or something
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4797
@sergant best of the best inho
 
@Sergeant imho
 
Also there were ppl from jsf contacting Sinn, he said he can widen ipd up to 6mm without doing OBO. It could be game changer for people with long midfaces. This + face widening with zygomatic + jaw osteotomy could help ppl a lot.
View attachment 761770
But obo can achieve more things right? I think you can also increase Canthal tilt and the protrusion of the whole orbital
 
But obo can achieve more things right? I think you can also increase Canthal tilt and the protrusion of the whole orbital
Idk, never considered OBO, too hardcore.
 
If those things actually can be achieved I think it's worth considering it
If there is surgery which can help me to achieve Chico or O'Pry orbitals i would go for it even if risk of death was 50% but there is nothing which could give us something similar. Dont think if pain and money are worth, especially that ppl from jsf told that you would be lucky getting it under 100k dollars.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
If there is surgery which can help me to achieve Chico or O'Pry orbitals i would go for it even if risk of death was 50% but there is nothing which could give us something similar. Dont think if pain and money are worth, especially that ppl from jsf told that you would be lucky getting it under 100k dollars.
I think it also depends on how good your orbitals are to begin with, mine lack exactly 3 things, a bit of canthal tilt, protrusion and 6-8mm ipd
100k obviously is insane, but I'll definetly look more into it, cause it's what would ascend me the most
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: needsolution
I think it also depends on how good your orbitals are to begin with, mine lack exactly 3 things, a bit of canthal tilt, protrusion and 6-8mm ipd
100k obviously is insane, but I'll definetly look more into it, cause it's what would ascend me the most
Well if you lack 6-8mm ipd then its hard case i'd say, i highly doubt you can achieve this. Keep in mind that you would need also around 3-4mm pfl to not look uncanny after. But wish you luck with this, if you find something interesting then hit me up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
Well if you lack 6-8mm ipd then its hard case i'd say, i highly doubt you can achieve this. Keep in mind that you would need also around 3-4mm pfl to not look uncanny after. But wish you luck with this, if you find something interesting then hit me up.
I have 36mm pfl, that's why I look insanely uncanny atm, let you know if I find some more info
 
  • +1
Reactions: needsolution
My pfl are 30cm and people say I have small Pfl in this place... What is Chad tier?
 
Something seems weird to me. First different studies report vastly different findings. A couple mm even just 1mm difference between studies is significant with these type of measurements. Second, the averages seem pretty high whereas irl you notice a lot of subhumanly narrow PFL (talking about white people) who have to be in the 25mm range. Third, way too many people on here claim to have wide PFL which agree with the studies averages but not with IRL experiences. How was the attractiveness of the eyes judged? In isolation or all on the same example face? I think people with narrower faces (generally considered more attractive IRL) have correspondingly narrower PFL. Maybe it is other things influncing the perception of how attractive someones eyes are.
 
To have god tier eyes.. You need to have 35-38mm... even at 30mm.. Its small..
 
I have 36mm pfl, that's why I look insanely uncanny atm, let you know if I find some more info
Wait, 36mm... That's literally 99.5 perct ...
How your eye look with such wide PFL...
On narrow skull IT would look really bad but you probably have wide skull if your pfl is so high
 
  • +1
Reactions: Darkstrand
Wait, 36mm... That's literally 99.5 perct ...
How your eye look with such wide PFL...
On narrow skull IT would look really bad but you probably have wide skull if your pfl is so high
Remeasured, it's closer to 35 mm... This and PCT alone make my eyes look extremly alien, my subhuman IPD makes it look really uncanny tho
Yeah I do have wide skull, that's why I really really need OBO tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5385

Similar threads

TheTD7
Replies
53
Views
1K
luria
luria
chief detectiveman
Replies
8
Views
2K
bourgeoizyzz
bourgeoizyzz
emeraldglass
Replies
1
Views
14K
emeraldglass
emeraldglass
FrenchChad
Replies
43
Views
2K
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top