Ideal Ratios For Men (Gtfih Greycels)

lowtiernormiechad

lowtiernormiechad

prettyboychadmaxxing
Joined
Dec 17, 2023
Posts
2,201
Reputation
2,822
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Surgerymaxxer1998, NoReedemingFeature, toolateforme and 4 others
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
Disagree with some of them and it's more complicated than CreatingAttractive makes it seem

Only a few ppl on this site know why. I'll explain it all one day
 
  • +1
Reactions: maarda, FacialStructure404, FUE Mogger and 2 others
Ratios are cope

I already solved looks theory
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: FacialStructure404 and lowtiernormiechad
0% of this matters if above 12% bodyfat
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: TheBiggestIncelEver and lowtiernormiechad
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
 
  • +1
Reactions: org3cel.RR and lowtiernormiechad
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
I dont have anything to measure harmony but his harmony is very high
 
  • +1
Reactions: FUE Mogger
I dont have anything to measure harmony but his harmony is very high
Doesnt his side profile look incel tho or am i just having Psl Brainrot from seeing @thecel Ogre morphs
 
  • +1
Reactions: lowtiernormiechad
  • +1
Reactions: FUE Mogger
Ratios mean nothing
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature and lowtiernormiechad
It really doesn't and you don't always have to be in the ideal range
good luck being chad tier with 60% harmony
 
everyone that thumbs-upped this thread are npcs
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: donkeyskin, Running! and cannotbeasked
Bro you joined in 2023 I was on lookism before this site even existed
BRO I KNEW OF THE BLACKPILL SINCE 1980 U FUCKING TIKTOKCEL KYS :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
BRO I KNEW OF THE BLACKPILL SINCE 1980 U FUCKING TIKTOKCEL KYS :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
Bro it's not about who knows it before or after it's about who knows it better and don't know nothing about ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: leagso_004
Disagree with some of them and it's more complicated than CreatingAttractive makes it seem

Only a few ppl on this site know why. I'll explain it all one day
you've been talking about these threads your going to post one day for months bhai
when is one day
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
In reality this is extremely variable and a slight change in pfl can decide which esr looks bests, with higher pfl looking great at even 0.5+ esr.
And bigonial too whether the cause of your small bigonial actually being a narrow jaw or protruding zygos.
 
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
I can do a full facial analysis but nah im tired
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FUE Mogger
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
How do you correctly measure jaw frontal angle?
 

Similar threads

Bheimal
Replies
7
Views
2K
Youssef_
Youssef_
cheeseisbased
Replies
9
Views
503
faxilla
faxilla
benkier]
Replies
33
Views
1K
Deleted member 88357
D
Samiscool234
Replies
25
Views
1K
UnevenNeckshi
U
A
Replies
21
Views
572
alaind
A

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top