Ideal Ratios For Men (Gtfih Greycels)

pfl

pfl

off here at 12% bf
Joined
Dec 17, 2023
Posts
7,472
Reputation
12,946
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • Woah
Reactions: Hernan, JeanneDArcAlter, Sonneillon and 10 others
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
Disagree with some of them and it's more complicated than CreatingAttractive makes it seem

Only a few ppl on this site know why. I'll explain it all one day
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tai Lung, playxiing, Mumbhai and 5 others
Ratios are cope

I already solved looks theory
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Tai Lung, playxiing, FacialStructure404 and 1 other person
0% of this matters if above 12% bodyfat
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: aldamogger, Mumbhai, Deleted member 71093 and 1 other person
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tai Lung, org3cel.RR and pfl
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
I dont have anything to measure harmony but his harmony is very high
 
  • +1
Reactions: FUE Mogger
I dont have anything to measure harmony but his harmony is very high
Doesnt his side profile look incel tho or am i just having Psl Brainrot from seeing @thecel Ogre morphs
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tai Lung and pfl
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Tai Lung and FUE Mogger
Ratios mean nothing
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature and pfl
It really doesn't and you don't always have to be in the ideal range
good luck being chad tier with 60% harmony
 
everyone that thumbs-upped this thread are npcs
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: donkeyskin, Running! and cannotbeasked
Bro you joined in 2023 I was on lookism before this site even existed
BRO I KNEW OF THE BLACKPILL SINCE 1980 U FUCKING TIKTOKCEL KYS :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
BRO I KNEW OF THE BLACKPILL SINCE 1980 U FUCKING TIKTOKCEL KYS :soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
Bro it's not about who knows it before or after it's about who knows it better and don't know nothing about ratios
 
  • +1
Reactions: leagso_004
Disagree with some of them and it's more complicated than CreatingAttractive makes it seem

Only a few ppl on this site know why. I'll explain it all one day
you've been talking about these threads your going to post one day for months bhai
when is one day
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
In reality this is extremely variable and a slight change in pfl can decide which esr looks bests, with higher pfl looking great at even 0.5+ esr.
And bigonial too whether the cause of your small bigonial actually being a narrow jaw or protruding zygos.
 
How many of those ratios does Eriksen check off or which ones does he fall short in?

Pin page
Andreas Eriksen | TEAM Models
I can do a full facial analysis but nah im tired
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FUE Mogger
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
How do you correctly measure jaw frontal angle?
 
Here is the ideal ranges (according to CreatingAttractive)
ESR: 0.443-0.477
Facial Thirds: Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height
Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men
Jaw Frontal Angle: 85-95
Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 2.5 at most
Ipsilateral alar angle: 85-95
Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.4-2
Eyebrow low setedness: 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line
Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6
Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.33-1.38
FWHR: 1.9-2.06
Midface Ratio: 0.93-1.01
Eyebrow Tilt: 5-13 deg
Neck width relative to bigonial width: 90-100%
Bitemporal width: 85-95% of cheekbone width
cheekbone high setedness: Atleast 81% of midface height (at the eyeline)
Mouth to nose width: 1.38-1.53
Bigonail width: 85.5-92% of cheekbone width
Lower third proportion 30.6-34%
@thecel @greycel
Yo bro so as a normal being, what the fuck is this post. Is this like something you carry around so you can rate people professionally haha.
 
ESR: 0.465 (ideal is 0.443-0.477) IDEAL

Facial Thirds: upper 29 middle 33 lower 36.8 (ideal is Cant deviate by more than 3.5 from 33%, 36.5 maximum lower third height) Slightly unideal

Canthal Tilt: 5 (ideal is 5.2-8.5 ideal in caucasian men) IDEAL

Jaw Frontal Angle: 80 or smth idk how to measure (ideal is 85-95) 5% from IDEAL

Ipsilateral alar angle deviation from jaw frontal angle: 0 (ideal is 2.5 at most) IDEAL

Ipsilateral alar angle: 80 (ideal is 85-95) 5% from IDEAL

Lower lip to upper lip ratio: 1.56 (ideal is 1.4-2) IDEAL

Eyebrow low setedness: 0.63 (ideal is 0-0.66 eye heights above the eye line) IDEAL

Eye aspect ratio: 3 (ideal is 2.8-3.6) IDEAL

Total Facial Width to Height Ratio: 1.38 (ideal is 1.33-1.38) IDEAL

FWHR: 2.05 (ideal is 1.9-2.06) IDEAL

Midface Ratio: 1 (ideal is 0.93-1.01) IDEAL

Eyebrow Tilt: 5% (ideal is 5-13 deg) IDEAL

Neck width relative to bigonial width: 97% (ideal is 90-100%) IDEAL

Bitemporal width: 97.5% (ideal is 85-95% of cheekbone width) 2.5% from ideal

cheekbone high setedness: 85% (ideal is 81%+) IDEAL

Mouth to nose width: 1.45 (ideal is 1.38-1.53) IDEAL

Bigonail width: 89% (ideal is 85.5-92% of cheekbone width0 IDEAL

Lower third proportion: 36.8 (ideal is 30.6-34%) 8.11% from IDEAL
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
Idk how to measure jaw frontal angle or that nose angle so I assumed its around 80, but mine looks pretty much like Matt Bomer's or Chico Lachowski's
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl

Similar threads

midgetfacecumer
Replies
17
Views
2K
Napoleon1800
Napoleon1800
pfl
Replies
35
Views
1K
psychomandible
psychomandible
maxlooksmax
Replies
12
Views
341
brownmutt42
brownmutt42
maxlooksmax
Replies
27
Views
1K
uOrca
uOrca

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top