Ideas for dating apps

[AlexAP]

Restrict the number of male users.
Restrict the number of likes men can send.

For example: A dating app which is 50/50 male-female, or 60/40 at most. And men can only send 20 likes per week (80 per month).

With this, women on dating apps will have much less likes/matches and will be less entitled than they are. They won't use the apps just to get validation, because not every random Becky will get 400 likes/matches just for existing. And men won't be able to simp too much, as they will be forced to be more selective. I'm not saying men will have all the power, but the playing field will be more even than it is today.

 

[Chadeep]

I mean they can but they won't get high revenue by doing that. Most of the profits come from getting men to pay for premium subscription.

 

[yams]

I don’t see a reason why any woman would go on there, I like my dating apps to actually have women

 

[AlexAP]

I don’t see a reason why any woman would go on there, I like my dating apps to actually have women

Wdym they will still have women.

 

[AlexAP]

I mean they can but they won't get high revenue by doing that. Most of the profits come from getting men to pay for premium subscription.

They surely can make revenue without that.

 

[thegoat]

this already happens at clubs when its a packed night

 

[yams]

Wdym they will still have women.

Tinder gets a lot of traction from women because there are so many options for them to pick from; itd most likely ending up with having a handful of stacies that’re getting flooded with likes (since likes are limited) and some mid tier girls that stay for a week then leave

 

[AlexAP]

this already happens at clubs when its a packed night

Yes, and it's a good thing.

 

[AlexAP]

Tinder gets a lot of traction from women because there are so many options for them to pick from

The majority of women say they don't like getting 100+ DM from thirsty men and they would like to receive more serious messages. This is what would be achieved.

And of course, the ones who do like to get that validation from thirsty men wouldn't be on the app, only girls who have intentions to meet someone would sign up.

itd most likely ending up with having a handful of stacies that’re getting flooded with likes (since likes are limited)

Nope, men would be more realistic since likes are limited, non-Chads would send more likes to Beckys than to Stacys.

and some mid tier girls that stay for a week then leave

I don't even think that would be that bad, men would probably leave fast too if they could find LTR/FWB easily. Staying long on these apps is a sign that it's not working, isn't it?

 

[thegoat]

Ok first of all how would u decide which males get access to the app.

Scenario A: Its based on looks/ranking system. We have the same problem as before with top 10% slayers and a shit ton of incels

Scenario B: Its random. Females will realise that that app is utter shit for them compared to competitor apps with more GL and desperate dudes. That app will die and competitor apps take over

 

[yams]

The majority of women say they don't like getting 100+ DM from thirsty men and they would like to receive more serious messages. This is what would be achieved.

And of course, the ones who do like to get that validation from thirsty men wouldn't be on the app, only girls who have intentions to meet someone would sign up.

Nope, men would be more realistic since likes are limited, non-Chads would send more likes to Beckys than to Stacys.

I don't even think that would be that bad, men would probably leave fast too if they could find LTR/FWB easily. Staying long on these apps is a sign that it's not working, isn't it?

Honestly dude I’m not the best gauge of this, I get all of my bitches off bumble lmao

By leaving I mostly meant leaving and not forming any connections on the app

 

[AlexAP]

Ok first of all how would u decide which males get access to the app.

It would be random, whoever signs up first and new men will be rejected if it's not 50/50 gender ratio.

Scenario B: Its random. Females will realise that that app is utter shit for them compared to competitor apps with more GL and desperate dudes. That app will die and competitor apps take over

Only women who want messages from desperate men or only GL men would leave. The women who are interested in meeting someone who is attractive enough (reaching their looks threshold) and actually puts effort (for LTR/FWB) would stay on the app.

 

[hebbewem]

They already exist .bumble and dating apps you need to pay for

 

[AlexAP]

They already exist .bumble and dating apps you need to pay for

Well bumble still has much more male users, but yeah it's better than other apps.

 

[thegoat]

It would be random, whoever signs up first and new men will be rejected if it's not 50/50 gender ratio.

Only women who want messages from desperate men or only GL men would leave. The women who are interested in meeting someone who is attractive enough (reaching their looks threshold) and actually puts effort (for LTR/FWB) would stay on the app.

bro why would women willingly lower their standards in they are getting attention from more GL dudes on other apps on average.

 

[Deleted]

Restrict the number of male users.
Restrict the number of likes men can send.

For example: A dating app which is 50/50 male-female, or 60/40 at most. And men can only send 20 likes per week (80 per month).

With this, women on dating apps will have much less likes/matches and will be less entitled than they are. They won't use the apps just to get validation, because not every random Becky will get 400 likes/matches just for existing. And men won't be able to simp too much, as they will be forced to be more selective. I'm not saying men will have all the power, but the playing field will be more even than it is today.

We men wouldnt use that then

 

[AlexAP]

bro why would women willingly lower their standards in they are getting attention from more GL dudes on other apps on average.

If the vast majority of women prefers other apps, it won't change anything. If the new app works good for enough users, it will find an userbase.

And maybe the existing apps could change their rules, not just a new one.

 

[AlexAP]

We men wouldnt use that then

Men would use it, they would just need to become more selective.

 

[Deleted]

Men would use it, they would just need to become more selective.

Its supposed to say women not We men jfl

point is why would they pick a dating site giving less validation and options

 

[thegoat]

If the vast majority of women prefers other apps, it won't change anything. If the new app works good for enough users, it will find an userbase.

And maybe the existing apps could change their rules, not just a new one.

no, its supply vs demand economics, the app will die out. Government enforced monogamy is the logical conclusion to what ur trying to achieve with these apps and might work

 

[AlexAP]

Its supposed to say women not We men jfl

point is why would they pick a dating site giving less validation and options

Men would still write messages first, it would be just less numbers and more serious. The women who don't just go for validation and actually want to find someone will have it easier.

 

[AlexAP]

no, its supply vs demand economics, the app will die out.

We don't know for sure.

Government enforced monogamy is the logical conclusion to what ur trying to achieve with these apps and might work

I'm against government enforced monogamy, and dating apps in general aren't the most important thing (social circle is better for meeting partners). But dating apps could work better.

 

[Xangsane]

It would be random, whoever signs up first and new men will be rejected if it's not 50/50 gender ratio.

Only women who want messages from desperate men or only GL men would leave. The women who are interested in meeting someone who is attractive enough (reaching their looks threshold) and actually puts effort (for LTR/FWB) would stay on the app.

I.e. Most women

 

[Deleted member 9670]

We don't know for sure.

I'm against government enforced monogamy, and dating apps in general aren't the most important thing (social circle is better for meeting partners). But dating apps could work better.

Are you taking fin yet

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Just nuke dating apps theory

 

[AlexAP]

Are you taking fin yet

No, but I'm not gonna get bald, as I have a HT soon and even if it will fall out after a few years I would have no problem with a second HT or wearing a hair system. Two doctors told me to not take fin, I will see what I will do after the HT.

 

[n0rthface]

Better solution: Ban dating apps

 

[AlexAP]

Better solution: Ban dating apps

Cope, online dating will never disappear.

 

[AlexAP]

Just nuke dating apps theory

They wouldn't be nuked, they would be free from men who swipe on every landwhale and women who are only seeking validation.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

They wouldn't be nuked, they would be free from men who swipe on every landwhale and women who are only seeking validation.

Then their primary business model would be gone.

 

[cvzvvc]

The premise of these apps hinges upon attracting women who otherwise would be creeped out by using them. The validation is the necessary glue that holds the whole thing together. Less validation = less incentive for women to use the apps. Attention is often better than sex for women.

What should really happen is society should collectively cut the fucking bullshit and just take away the stigma of escorting and prostitution, because that's basically what's going on regardless. At least if your average male could proposition upfront, things would be more realistic. Seeking Arrangement is unironically the future as far as things go. Almost every girl you've ever met has likely engaged in some sort of soft prostitution. Free drinks and meals at restaurants count.

It's only going to get worse from here.

 

[AlexAP]

What should really happen is society should collectively cut the fucking bullshit and just take away the stigma of escorting and prostitution, because that's basically what's going on regardless.

In Germany, prostitution is legal in brothels, in the street and online, but the power dynamics still haven't change. Men want real mutual attraction and not to pay for it.

The real solution is men have to looksmax more and women should become less passive in initiating dates (giving "hints" don't count).

 

[Deleted member 9670]

No, but I'm not gonna get bald, as I have a HT soon and even if it will fall out after a few years I would have no problem with a second HT or wearing a hair system. Two doctors told me to not take fin, I will see what I will do after the HT.

Which doctors....

Even Doctors fall for the dear mongering at least use minox or look into topical treatment of you're scared of fin

 

[Blackgymmax]

What female would use a dating app where they have to face their looksmatch

 

[Enfant terrible]

No, but I'm not gonna get bald, as I have a HT soon and even if it will fall out after a few years I would have no problem with a second HT or wearing a hair system. Two doctors told me to not take fin, I will see what I will do after the HT.

What doctors told you ?

 

[Blackgymmax]

In Germany, prostitution is legal in brothels, in the street and online, but the power dynamics still haven't change. Men want real mutual attraction and not to pay for it.

The real solution is men have to looksmax more and women should become less passive in initiating dates (giving "hints" don't count).

No lmao. They raise the bar even higher. Theres no solution. Its just a flaw in female design. Looksmax delusion is the genetic failures coping with the hard work meme. Us looksmaxxing doesnt actually mean anything when the actual talent works hard. You need to understand this truth. Why do you think tinder gets harder overtime? More normies and better looking dudes began dumpster diving. The problem is women, thats it. They dont appreciate any level of genetics that men can offer on average at any level we progress to

 

[AlexAP]

Which doctors....

What doctors told you ?

It was one dermatologist and one hair specialist that I paid for a trichogram.

 

[AlexAP]

No lmao. They raise the bar even higher. Theres no solution. Its just a flaw in female design. Looksmax delusion is the genetic failures coping with the hard work meme. Us looksmaxxing doesnt actually mean anything when the actual talent works hard. You need to understand this truth. Why do you think tinder gets harder overtime? More normies and better looking dudes began dumpster diving. The problem is women, thats it. They dont appreciate any level of genetics that men can offer on average at any level we progress to

I disagree. If men looksmax more, women would be more attracted to men (on statistical average). Women have an insane advantage because of makeup and fashion. Most men don't do shit.

 

[Deleted member 9670]

It was one dermatologist and one hair specialist that I paid for a trichogram.

Hair specialist told you not to take fin...

Sus he just wants your transplant money

 

[AlexAP]

Hair specialist told you not to take fin...

Sus he just wants your transplant money

The hair specialist wasn't the guy who will make the HT.

I know that the studies say fin is not risky on average, so I guess I will take it after the HT is done (which will be this year).