Ideologies rated by me [ragebait I guess]

Libertarianism 10/10
Liberalism 7/10
Monarchy 6/10
Fascism 5/10
Social democracy 4/10
Anarchism 3/10
Communism 0/10
@Volksstaffel
(((They))) are bringing put the champagne rn jfl

@ImVerySorry @imontheloose @psychomandible
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Hernan and 6 others
It's a theory for losers who want to steal from the winners
Honestly, just elect me Prime Minister tbh. I'll riddle the country with debt but we'll have a fun time.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: vevcred2_0, Сигма Бой, psychomandible and 1 other person
They failed because of apartheid
They failed because they lived in a post right wing world (right wing lost in ww2, US is a leftist country in it's nature and couldn't tolerate either Germany nor these 2 countries)
 
  • +1
Reactions: vevcred2_0, Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel
Only thing that will work is a theocracy

Romans 13:1-2 King James Version

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.​

 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: whitestacyslayer, emeraldglass and vevcred2_0
Hate to break it to you, but our governments are heavily involved in farming today...


Socialism ≠ planned economy?



They failed because of apartheid


No profit at current prices, they'd have to skyrocket the prizes


Free market promotes centralisation
And our farming is held by a few massive farms instead of small farms and so the big farms can inflate prices themselves instead of having to actually compete with smaller farms.

Socialism is a planned economy nigga


And do you have anything to back your claim that there is 0 profit at current prices ? Or are you just saying stuff to seem like yk what you're talking about.

Again with your free market claim, do you have any thing to back it up ? Beacuse in what planet does decentralisation cause centralisation
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: vevcred2_0 and Сигма Бой
They failed because they lived in a post right wing world (right wing lost in ww2, US is a leftist country in it's nature and couldn't tolerate either Germany nor these 2 countries)
True I guess

Honestly, just elect me Prime Minister tbh. I'll riddle the country with debt but we'll have a fun time.
1000016000

Mandatory Stacies for incels 🗣️
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, vevcred2_0 and 3 others
It has already happened in capitalist countries, which is why antitrust and monopoly laws have been created.
Like which "capitalist" countries ? Beacuse I promise every single one you say will be mixed economy and not actually capitalist
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: vevcred2_0, childishkillah and Сигма Бой
1000016000

Mandatory Stacies for incels 🗣️
They're all FORCED to be with me, son. Else, you're all getting sent to Tel Aviv with a swastika tattooed on your forehead.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: vevcred2_0, Volksstaffel and Сигма Бой
My honest opinion, no bait.
Some might be triggered tho :hnghn:



Anarchism:

Works in no shape or form. Anarchists are retarded af.
(1/10)



Capitalism:
Helps the economy but destroyed any spirit of the people. They become cattle to the rich.
(5/10)



Anarcho Capitalism:
Do I even need to say anything :hnghn:
(0/10)



Communism:
Good idea in theory, but doesn't work. Also fails to see the whole picture. They see the collectivism in the workers, which is just stupid.
(5/10)



Social democracy:
Democracy is just stupid. Focusing on voters instead of the people.
Also incredibly easily controlled by ((them)))
(6/10)



Fascism (Mussolini):
Almost perfect. The only thing I'd criticise is the lack of spiritualism.
(9/10)



National socialism:
Combines all my favourite parts of politics. Dictatorship, socialism, spiritualism, etc.
(10/10)

View attachment 3782826


Might make a more detailed version some day :feelsokman:

i honestly dont know any of them
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: etherwake, seanonigger, Pento and 3 others
Why even have the state then if the people are responsible enough to watch the state ?
The state exists because it helps keep things organized and solves problems that would be hard to handle on our own. People judging the state doesn’t mean we don’t need it, it just means we’re making sure it’s doing its job. Without a state, power would just go to big companies or private groups, and they wouldn’t have to listen to anyone. So, a responsible society uses the state to keep things fair and under control.

Late stage capitalism is a cope for moral decay and degeneracy, also you know Marx thought he was living in late stage capitalism in the mid 1800s :lul:
"Late-stage capitalism" points to real problems like inequality and exploitation. Marx misjudged the timing, but today’s issues, wealth hoarding, decay, and harm are still serious. Mocking it doesn’t solve them.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой, vevcred2_0 and Volksstaffel
And our farming is held by a few massive farms instead of small farms and so the big farms can inflate prices themselves instead of having to actually compete with smaller farms.
Yeah, I know. Fuck Capitalism

Socialism is a planned economy nigga
Might be a language barrier, don't know the right word

And do you have anything to back your claim that there is 0 profit at current prices ? Or are you just saying stuff to seem like yk what you're talking about.
I can tell you in Germany farmers (friends and family) are fucked if they don't get help by lower gas prices and fixed milk prices

Again with your free market claim, do you have any thing to back it up ? Beacuse in what planet does decentralisation cause centralisation
Common sense I guess. I mean what would stop big companies from dumping prices to eliminate small companies and then buying them ?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person
Niggas voting for communism and fascism cus they want to govern for incels but they don't know that women are the future so they will live according to what women want from men and pay the price of avoiding free market.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, Сигма Бой, vevcred2_0 and 1 other person
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 2 others
And our farming is held by a few massive farms instead of small farms and so the big farms can inflate prices themselves instead of having to actually compete with smaller farms.
Thats literally a good thing though, larger farms make it easier to mass produce.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой, vevcred2_0 and Volksstaffel
Like which "capitalist" countries ? Beacuse I promise every single one you say will be mixed economy and not actually capitalist
With the economic freedom enjoyed by the United States in the 19th century, there were already large trusts and monopolies, most notably the Standard Oil Company. In the 1990s, a much more regulated state, Microsoft practically dominated the market and engaged in unfair competition practices. In any case, if this can occur in countries with regulations, it would make anarcho-capitalism even more stupid. If companies in states that regulate them engage in these practices, what will they do when they can do whatever they want?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой, vevcred2_0 and Volksstaffel
With the economic freedom enjoyed by the United States in the 19th century, there were already large trusts and monopolies, most notably the Standard Oil Company. In the 1990s, a much more regulated state, Microsoft practically dominated the market and engaged in unfair competition practices. In any case, if this can occur in countries with regulations, it would make anarcho-capitalism even more stupid. If companies in states that regulate them engage in these practices, what will they do when they can do whatever they want?
What I said :love: Socialist reforms saved us from hell during the industrial revolution.
Without these reforms we would work 16 hours a day for some jew just to have enough food to survive like in 1890
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 2 others
Thats literally a good thing though, larger farms make it easier to mass produce.
As long as the big farms are run by a force which prioritises the wellbeing of the people it's fine. Huge farm owners under capitalism are disgusting
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 3 others
The state exists because it helps keep things organized and solves problems that would be hard to handle on our own. People judging the state doesn’t mean we don’t need it, it just means we’re making sure it’s doing its job. Without a state, power would just go to big companies or private groups, and they wouldn’t have to listen to anyone. So, a responsible society uses the state to keep things fair and under control.


"
The state will never and has never serves the people, its self serving and only serves itself. Even in nau Germany where apparently it was serving muh blood it still serves itself.
"Late-stage capitalism" points to real problems like inequality and exploitation. Marx misjudged the timing, but today’s issues, wealth hoarding, decay, and harm are still serious. Mocking it doesn’t solve them.
Late stage capitalism is not a thing jfl, inequality is apart of life I thought you were a wignat or something except you're here talking about muh inequality. :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой
@Gargantuan gtfih :lul:
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger and Сигма Бой
Yeah, I know. Fuck Capitalism


Might be a language barrier, don't know the right word


I can tell you in Germany farmers (friends and family) are fucked if they don't get help by lower gas prices and fixed milk prices


Common sense I guess. I mean what would stop big companies from dumping prices to eliminate small companies and then buying them ?
1. Any state intervention immediately voids the economy from being capitalist

2. You do know the gas prices are held by companies subsidised by the government right :feelshmm:

3. The small company can stop for a while and wait for the bigger company to go back to its original inflated price and then open shop again. Big companies can not lose money for ever.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой
Thats literally a good thing though, larger farms make it easier to mass produce.
And make it so competition has low impact and so your prices can stay inflated:lul: Have fun paying 30$ for eggs when I get them for free
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой
What I said :love: Socialist reforms saved us from hell during the industrial revolution.
Without these reforms we would work 16 hours a day for some jew just to have enough food to survive like in 1890
A revolution didn't happen in England despite all the communism propaganda because capitalists know how their workers are living, if workers stop working they also stop earning. The relationship between a capitalist and his workers is a contract, if they don't pay me enough I will search for another company. If there's not another company we as a labor force stop working until they raise the wages (this is happening with chinese students who deny working for less).

The main problem with workers is not asking for a raise, instead if you put a wage standard for every company the prices of the product will increase aka the cost of living will increase. If the price of the product is too high people will buy from another company or stop consuming until they lower the price and capitalists reduce their benefit margins.

Only when people settle things get worse, quit your Mcdonald's job until they offer you something better. Same goes with real estate, prices only go up because people are willing to pay more for a house instead of going to a cheaper place and start creating a society there and leaving the construction companies with a debt. If more people do that prices will decrease it's obvious, it's like trying to buy luxury bags when you're broke (btw the luxury fashion is a sinking business rn).
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, Сигма Бой and psychomandible
With the economic freedom enjoyed by the United States in the 19th century, there were already large trusts and monopolies, most notably the Standard Oil Company. In the 1990s, a much more regulated state, Microsoft practically dominated the market and engaged in unfair competition practices. In any case, if this can occur in countries with regulations, it would make anarcho-capitalism even more stupid. If companies in states that regulate them engage in these practices, what will they do when they can do whatever they want?
Standard oil was subsidised by the government. You're not understanding that monopolies can only happen with government intervention due to
1. Higher price entry points
2. Company deals with the government
3. Corruption
These are some reasons but in ancap the only price entry point would be how much does it cost to make the good, there would be no government deals and there would be no Corruption.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Klasik616
As long as the big farms are run by a force which prioritises the wellbeing of the people it's fine. Huge farm owners under capitalism are disgusting
So you want slavery :lul::lul::lul: @imontheloose bad sight for your team that they're actively calling to enslave farmers
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой and imontheloose
The state will never and has never serves the people, its self serving and only serves itself. Even in nau Germany where apparently it was serving muh blood it still serves itself.
Ever heard of a tiny place called North Korea?

Late stage capitalism is not a thing jfl, inequality is apart of life I thought you were a wignat or something except you're here talking about muh inequality. :lul:
Well I don’t think a single Norwegian should worry about if they can put food on the table for their kids next Sunday, and I don’t think any German should feel that way either. I don’t see the reason some people should have more money than entire countries for personal pleasure while others starve. If you criticize fascism or the state for having no checks in power then that translates perfectly to capitalism, especially over time when companies have the opportunity to monopolize.
 
  • Love it
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel

Romans 13:1-2 King James Version​

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.​

“O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.”


— Surah An-Nisa (4:59)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой
1. Any state intervention immediately voids the economy from being capitalist
Dumb argument. You can be capitalist even with slight socialist norms.

2. You do know the gas prices are held by companies subsidised by the government right :feelshmm:
That's what I said, no?

3. The small company can stop for a while and wait for the bigger company to go back to its original inflated price and then open shop again. Big companies can not lose money for ever.
The face of the farmer who made 10% of what he spent for a whole year: :hnghn:
This nigger is gone within a year
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger and Сигма Бой
Ever heard of a tiny place called North Korea?
jfl at you using north Korea as a example for socialism working :lul:
Well I don’t think a single Norwegian should worry about if they can put food on the table for their kids next Sunday, and I don’t think any German should feel that way either. I don’t see the reason some people should have more money than entire countries for personal pleasure while others starve. If you criticize fascism or the state for having no checks in power then that translates perfectly to capitalism, especially over time when companies have the opportunity to monopolize.
If the Norwegian can not be bothered to try hard in life then he should starve, life is not a fairy tale where you get everything handed to you. I can't believe this has to be explained to near adults
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Klasik616
So you want slavery :lul::lul::lul: @imontheloose bad sight for your team that they're actively calling to enslave farmers
A lot of "National Socialists" follow it because of Vril edits, sadly. It takes a decent bit of knowledge of general politics to fully be able to reason your own beliefs.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой, psychomandible and Volksstaffel
Standard oil was subsidised by the government. You're not understanding that monopolies can only happen with government intervention due to
1. Higher price entry points
2. Company deals with the government
3. Corruption
These are some reasons but in ancap the only price entry point would be how much does it cost to make the good, there would be no government deals and there would be no Corruption.
No, I don't remember the state funding the SOC. And no, the SOC became a monopoly thanks to Rockefeller's strategies, for example he controlled or influenced the means of distribution, the railroad, he was able to ultimately make all his competitors anticompetitive, causing them to eventually form under the SOC's wing.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Сигма Бой
A lot of "National Socialists" follow it because of Vril edits, sadly. It takes a decent bit of knowledge of general politics to fully be able to reason your own beliefs.
Did you read what I said? Nothing I said would support his claim
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой
Did you read what I said? Nothing I said would support his claim
I didn't, no. I was just responding to what he said. I didn't look at what he was quoting, son.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel
I didn't, no. I was just responding to what he said. I didn't look at what he was quoting, son.
Well do that in future before calling me a fake national socialist :feelswhat:
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person
“O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger, if you believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.”


— Surah An-Nisa (4:59)
Reasonable verse.
 
  • WTF
  • +1
Reactions: whitestacyslayer and emeraldglass
If the Norwegian can not be bothered to try hard in life then he should starve, life is not a fairy tale where you get everything handed to you. I can't believe this has to be explained to near adults
Are you retarded? I said kids shouldn’t starve and families shouldn’t be worried about starvation, if the elites pump up the prices then no matter how hard you work you won’t afford food. «Just work hard brah» as if hard work equals payment.

jfl at you using north Korea as a example for socialism working :lul:
Its called a joke retard, I’m not a socialist im just in favor of heavy welfare. As an example, Scandinavia, Heaven in earth until migrants came.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person
Well do that in future before calling me a fake national socialist :feelswhat:
I didn't. It had nothing to do with you.
A lot of "National Socialists" follow it because of Vril edits, sadly. It takes a decent bit of knowledge of general politics to fully be able to reason your own beliefs.
This doesn't mention you once. It is true nonetheless.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой
I didn't. It had nothing to do with you.

This doesn't mention you once. It is true nonetheless.
I mean one could assume this was about me because of the situation

It is true but I don't mind them.
Hitler himself said it's important to move the masses and pick those capable.
The rest can be used as pawns for the revolution
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person
I mean one could assume this was about me because of the situation

It is true but I don't mind them.
Hitler himself said it's important to move the masses and pick those capable.
The rest can be used as pawns for the revolution
Well yeah. If I wanted votes, I'd take anyone that I could get, but we are discussing ideals once power is accumulated to your party totally.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel
Well yeah. If I wanted votes, I'd take anyone that I could get, but we are discussing ideals once power is accumulated to your party totally.
Those who are to dumb to grasp the real ideology are quickly silenced after the gain of power
 
  • +1
Reactions: StacyRepellent, seanonigger, Сигма Бой and 1 other person

Romans 13:1-2 King James Version​

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.​

Póster de Lebron James, coronado King Lebron James Lakers, impresión  artística en lienzo para pared, diseño de estrella de baloncesto para  hombres y niños, decoración de dormitorio, (16 x 24 : Amazon.es:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Volksstaffel
Where is Social Darwinism ?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Basedman420
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Basedman420

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
53
Views
3K
Aladin
Aladin
Edgarpill
Replies
49
Views
5K
sillybilly
sillybilly
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
6K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
Ultravisionary Bism
Replies
14
Views
696
Deleted member 14262
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top