If a woman shot and killed a she would be sympathized with

[Vermilioncore]

If a woman shot and killed a man, most people would jump to conclusions and think the man was bad and that she did a good thing murdering him. Everyone would give her the benefit of the doubt.

But if a man shot a woman he’d automatically be seen as evil and people would rally for his death in the street in front of all the folk and their mothers and the entire square and village

 

[BearBoy]

Kill 50% of people and claim your a woman theory innit?

 

[looksmaxxed]

If a woman shot and killed a man, most people would jump to conclusions and think the man was bad and that she did a good thing murdering him. Everyone would give her the benefit of the doubt.

But if a man shot a woman he’d automatically be seen as evil and people would rally for his death in the street in front of all the folk and their mothers and the entire square and village

which is sensible because probability is on your side, wymxn are more likely to be victims of male violence then the other way around. if you had to make a decision on who's guilty without evidence, you'd have a higher chance of being right if you went with your instinct.

also even if you're wrong, you are defaulting to a position that contributes to deletion of male surplus.

 

[Deleted member 26410]

Sure, the women will get a lesser sentence, but you're deluded to think that they'll have favorable societal treatment after they murdered somebody.

Case Study: Ezra McCandless