If ethnicity was an essentalist trait, why did the (actual) Aryans call people who resembled them "non-Aryan"?

D

Deleted member 196670

Silver
Joined
Aug 1, 2025
Posts
724
Reputation
843
Because ethnicity isn't determined by skin colour. It's determined by a shared language, shared customs, shared ancestry and shared culture.

Ethnicity is also a social construct like race and is not biologically meaningful. It is also fluid. If ethnicity wasn't fluid, then Northern Russians wouldn't be "Russian" because they're more akin to Finns than to Russians elsewhere. But because they were Russified, they ceased to be Uralic and became Russian. So they are Russian despite their genetics.

"Greeks" are also similar. There is a lot more genetic diversity in Greece than in the UK for example. In fact, the Peloponnese alone has more diversity than the whole of the UK. A Dodecanese "Greek" has ~3.5% Slavic ancestry. A Macedonian "Greek" has ~40% Slavic ancestry. These are obviously distinguished. Then there are the so-called "Greeks" of Cyprus who at BEST are intermediate between Southeast Europe and the Levant but are likely to be firmly within the Levantine Core. Even culturally, Cypriots are intermediate between Greece and Lebanon as opposed to being a clone of Greece. Yet they're called "Greek" due to their LANGUAGE.

Only Anglosphere concepts of ethnicity are essentialist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable

Similar threads

hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Replies
23
Views
138
putumayo
putumayo
S
Replies
5
Views
34
seksibozo
seksibozo
inyerta
Replies
6
Views
69
inyerta
inyerta
Jason5000
Replies
5
Views
41
Jason5000
Jason5000
LA_vxmpk1NG
Replies
8
Views
61
LA_vxmpk1NG
LA_vxmpk1NG

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →