If eugenics are true, then why do none of Beckham's kids mog him?

[HeightPilledum]

sub 50 IQ if you think Eugenics isnt a real thing, epigenetic can also explain the differences

Prove eugenics are a thing when it comes to looks
They can only be applied to health and height, but there's no eugenics for your face

as if there would be chances of becoming chad or stacy if you were born from a subhuman couple

Most Chads have ugly or average looking parents

 

[Michelangelo]

Prove eugenics are a thing when it comes to looks

if you're a fucking mouthbreather you are going to look like a subhuman, same thing if you dont have correct oral hygiene, posture, balance hormones by avoiding chemicals and excercising + diet. the list is really long and its actually perplexing that you are asking me that. your maxilla, which is literally the main thing that changes your face isnt entirely genetic based in its development. same thing for your eyesight and other so much shit.
Edit: i keep confusing the 2 but I adressed it in another comment. Its absolutely clear how eugenics still plays a role

Most Chads have ugly or average looking parents

thats also can be explained with epigenetic. before you say this is not true, think about how genetics do play a significant role (but not 100%) in facial development, its common knowledge that sons/daughers are going to look like their parents.

reality is the ugliest trait in a human is underdevelopment

 

[Michelangelo]

Most Chads have ugly or average looking parents

if they are chads with genuinely ugly parents they are simply dodging bullets, like not getting a jewish nose or inheriting male pattern baldness (which btw you still carry the gene, its just not expressed, your son might still be a bald subhuman)

 

[HeightPilledum]

if you're a fucking mouthbreather you are going to look like a subhuman, same thing if you dont have correct oral hygiene, posture, balance hormones by avoiding chemicals and excercising + diet. the list is really long and its actually perplexing that you are asking me that. your maxilla, which is literally the main thing that changes your face isnt entirely genetic based in its development. same thing for your eyesight and other so much shit.
Edit: i keep confusing the 2 but I adressed it in another comment. Its absolutely clear how eugenics still plays a role

thats also can be explained with epigenetic. before you say this is not true, think about how genetics do play a significant role (but not 100%) in facial development, its common knowledge that sons/daughers are going to look like their parents.

reality is the ugliest trait in a human is underdevelopment

if they are chads with genuinely ugly parents they are simply dodging bullets, like not getting a jewish nose or inheriting male pattern baldness (which btw you still carry the gene, its just not expressed, your son might still be a bald subhuman)

How many Chads can you name that have Chad and Stacy parents? I'd say very few

Meanwhile literally all the most famous Chads have average or below average parents

 

[looksmaxxed]

eugenics just means greater likelihood of positive outcomes, not guaranteed. also, they didn't mew

 

[HeightPilledum]

eugenics just means greater likelihood of positive outcomes, not guaranteed. also, they didn't mew

Not when it comes to looks

 

[hirochan]

cake fraud roastie ruined the eye area for him. This is why make up should be banned, the whore would have been baking beans in shitty musty shack in corner of London if she didn't have the make up and body halo