If God exists, then why am I so ugly despite being a kind person while there is a 6’3 chad out there who’s a rapist, abuser, and a disgusting person?

[iblamegenetics7]

And the women will still choose the other guy lmao fuck ts I’m starting to lose faith in God

 

[Chasingthedream569]

Not everything is about woman

 

[Xavier]

And the women will still choose the other guy lmao fuck ts I’m starting to lose faith in God

Because god doesn’t exist. Even if it exists, I will never acknowledge it.

 

[JasGews69x]

you’re making the mistake of conflating natural distribution with metaphysical intention. the fact that life is asymmetrical—genetically, geographically, socially—only proves that nature is indifferent, not that a creator (if one exists) is unjust or favors one over another. this is a category error.


if a god exists, and especially if this god is not bound by material outcomes, then judging divine love by earthly success is like judging the depth of mathematics by how much money a mathematician makes. you're using the wrong metric.


the argument also assumes that suffering = neglect and advantage = preference, but that’s a projection of human psychology onto a transcendent concept. a parent may allow two children to endure very different paths—not out of favoritism, but because they understand that growth, humility, or meaning might emerge in one and not the other. whether or not this is “fair” from the child’s view doesn’t negate the presence of intentionality.


also, appealing to entropy (i.e. the universe trends toward disorder and suffering) doesn’t disprove god. it just sets the stage for what kind of god would make sense. maybe not an interventionist genie, but a god that allows agency, pain, and absurdity as part of a larger arc. rejecting god because life is cruel is like rejecting literature because the book contains suffering. you're not engaging with the premise—you’re upset with the plot.


if you reject all metaphysics, fine. but then don’t appeal to injustice—as injustice implies a standard, and standards don’t exist in raw entropy. in that view, you weren’t given a paper while someone else got a gun. no one was “given” anything. the paper, the gun, and your pain are all just particles moving toward heat death. no favoritism. just noise.


so either you're within a framework where suffering might serve a higher purpose (in which case divine love isn't disproved), or you're in a meaningless system (in which case love, justice, and preference are illusions). both are internally consistent. but don’t borrow emotional terms like “love” or “fairness” from one system and try to apply them to another.

 

[Xavier]

you’re making the mistake of conflating natural distribution with metaphysical intention. the fact that life is asymmetrical—genetically, geographically, socially—only proves that nature is indifferent, not that a creator (if one exists) is unjust or favors one over another. this is a category error.


if a god exists, and especially if this god is not bound by material outcomes, then judging divine love by earthly success is like judging the depth of mathematics by how much money a mathematician makes. you're using the wrong metric.


the argument also assumes that suffering = neglect and advantage = preference, but that’s a projection of human psychology onto a transcendent concept. a parent may allow two children to endure very different paths—not out of favoritism, but because they understand that growth, humility, or meaning might emerge in one and not the other. whether or not this is “fair” from the child’s view doesn’t negate the presence of intentionality.


also, appealing to entropy (i.e. the universe trends toward disorder and suffering) doesn’t disprove god. it just sets the stage for what kind of god would make sense. maybe not an interventionist genie, but a god that allows agency, pain, and absurdity as part of a larger arc. rejecting god because life is cruel is like rejecting literature because the book contains suffering. you're not engaging with the premise—you’re upset with the plot.


if you reject all metaphysics, fine. but then don’t appeal to injustice—as injustice implies a standard, and standards don’t exist in raw entropy. in that view, you weren’t given a paper while someone else got a gun. no one was “given” anything. the paper, the gun, and your pain are all just particles moving toward heat death. no favoritism. just noise.


so either you're within a framework where suffering might serve a higher purpose (in which case divine love isn't disproved), or you're in a meaningless system (in which case love, justice, and preference are illusions). both are internally consistent. but don’t borrow emotional terms like “love” or “fairness” from one system and try to apply them to another.

Yeah bro kids in africa suffering and dying, good boys in turkey suffering from loneliness, homeless people suffering from being poor.
Life is awesome for them.
They should love god for creating them desperate.

JFL at you.

 

[JasGews69x]

Yeah bro kids in africa suffering and dying, good boys in turkey suffering from loneliness, homeless people suffering from being poor.
Life is awesome for them.
They should love god for creating them desperate.

JFL at you.

did you even read it?

 

[Xavier]

did you even read it?

I regret reading it.
Afterlife copers coping with god while chads are fucking their crushes

 

[JasGews69x]

I regret reading it.
Afterlife copers coping with god while chads are fucking their crushes

in an atheistic universe, its just a rearrangement of atoms, why does it matter then?

 

[Xavier]

in an atheistic universe, its just a rearrangement of atoms, why does it matter then?

Being nihillistic doesn’t mean mean you would be happy if you even don’t meet your basic needs like sexual life, hunger or emotions.

 

[trualive]

And the women will still choose the other guy lmao fuck ts I’m starting to lose faith in God

a personally god does not exist tho a creator could possible exist

 

[JasGews69x]

Being nihillistic doesn’t mean mean you would be happy if you even don’t meet your basic needs like sexual life, hunger or emotions.

Happiness or anything else doesnt matter, everything is an accident

 

[batman1997]

There is no proof of god so he may or may not be real