Haider Khan
Silver
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2025
- Posts
- 596
- Reputation
- 473
According to the Western looksmaxxing community — and perhaps even the general consensus — Indians are considered unattractive. That may be fair enough as a broad claim. But here is what I find contradictory: when people mock Indian appearance, why do they consistently choose a visibly deformed face, or someone so extremely unattractive that even Indians themselves would find it remarkable?
If Indians are generally ugly, the argument should hold without needing outliers. Take a photo of a random Indian IT worker from Silicon Valley — or simply an average Indian off the street. By your own worldview, that should still be ugly enough to make the point. So why the need to reach for extreme cases? Why mention 5 feet 2 bald Indian ganitor? Random 5 feet 6 inches 25 y/o random Indian stem student with full hair from Houston isnt ugly enough?
If Indians are generally ugly, the argument should hold without needing outliers. Take a photo of a random Indian IT worker from Silicon Valley — or simply an average Indian off the street. By your own worldview, that should still be ugly enough to make the point. So why the need to reach for extreme cases? Why mention 5 feet 2 bald Indian ganitor? Random 5 feet 6 inches 25 y/o random Indian stem student with full hair from Houston isnt ugly enough?