If iq is real then answer me this simple question

M

mogger123

jfl
Joined
Dec 10, 2022
Posts
3,101
Reputation
3,531
Who is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275, Deleted member 23558, try2beme and 1 other person
@_MVP_
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: DelonLover1999, Deleted member 16275, Deleted member 4362 and 8 others
all subjective
 
@slop slinger @OGJBSLAYER
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 20399
Goethe.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Incorrect. The answer is none of them because iq isn't real
1695502181797
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore, nope, LampPostPrime and 12 others
Grothendieck easily tbh

He was a very deep thinker
 
Grothendieck easily tbh

He was a very deep thinker
But could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Deleted member 23558
shut the fuck up nigger
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16275, GuyFromSingapore, LampPostPrime and 2 others
But could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
it is called sub intellect remember the savant that could memorize a book by glancing over it but could not speak a word. LOW IQ you NERD
 
it is called sub intellect remember the savant that could memorize a book by glancing over it but could not speak a word. LOW IQ you NERD
Define subintellect in a way that doesn't sound retarded
 
But could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
Any autist can calculate lol

As for writing, it's pretty subjective

Yeah, he understood reality deeper than Einstein
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President
Define subintellect in a way that doesn't sound retarded
So you know how math and Language are two different things? well, an Iq is not a number to show proficiency in all fields but rather an average of all fields. Due to natural selection, certain parts of the brain become more efficent than others. Thus a Mathematician has the genetics required to logically assess a problem but cannot handle a social situation as easily as a communications major who is 90 IQ. It is all trade offs that come from genetic capital
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore and LampPostPrime
  • Woah
Reactions: LampPostPrime
So you know how math and Language are two different things? well, an Iq is not a number to show proficiency in all fields but rather an average of all fields. Due to natural selection, certain parts of the brain become more efficent than others. Thus a Mathematician has the genetics required to logically assess a problem but cannot handle a social situation as easily as a communications major who is 90 IQ. It is all trade offs that come from genetic capital
No, math is language. Jfl not gonna bother reading the rest of you paragraph when your first line is so factually incorrect
 
Mike Mentzer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President
Einstein moggs
 
based but he did site that arthur jones study
Idk what study? I was joking a bit mentzer took things too far in the end, i'm only doing HIT-lite
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President
Not true

Also not true

Einstein actually made groundbreaking discoveries with regard to how we perceive reality

Grothendieck just made up definitions for some super abstract nerd shit
Just try this

Go through the work of all these 4 individuals, and see which makes your mind work the hardest

It will be the work of Grothendieck
 
Just try this

Go through the work of all these 4 individuals, and see which makes your mind work the hardest

It will be the work of Grothendieck
but surely coming up with more eloquent and digestible ideas that have elements of practicality is higher iq?
 
but surely coming up with more eloquent and digestible ideas that have elements of practicality is higher iq?
It doesn't matter if the work is highly practical or completely theoretical. What matters here is which requires more mental endurance and ability.... the work of Grothendieck is way more complicated compared to the work of Einstein if someone who majored in physics and mathematics with equal understanding and aptitude tried to understand both works
 
It doesn't matter if the work is highly practical or completely theoretical. What matters here is which requires more mental endurance and ability.... the work of Grothendieck is way more complicated compared to the work of Einstein if someone who majored in physics and mathematics with equal understanding and aptitude tried to understand both works
when evaluating the merit of work done more goes into it than how difficult it is to follow
 
Idk what study? I was joking a bit mentzer took things too far in the end, i'm only doing HIT-lite
he cited a study that was basically fraud for an ad campaign to push HIT, I love the guy tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm
he cited a study that was basically fraud for an ad campaign to push HIT, I love the guy tho
The colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machines
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President
The colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machines
exactly
 
The colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machines
its a damn shame he tarnished his legacy for that
 
  • +1
Reactions: cytoplasm
But could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
Einstein was a plagiariser. You fell for a nasty Jew goyim
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Tabula Rasa and OGJBSLAYER
who tf r these randoms
 
when evaluating the merit of work done more goes into it than how difficult it is to follow
Merit of work done is too ambiguous ...

The work of GRD is in a league of its own. It's too abstract for even pure mathematics
 
We can take an educated guess but we cannot talk in absolutes. IQ is not the most effective way to measure intelligence. Intelligence is a vast and complex subject. Too vast and complex of a concept to be reduced and confined to a few digits. I've come across individuals with IQs just a hair bit above the human average with insane abstraction prowess. In contrast, I've encountered individuals with ridiculously high IQ scores who completely lack creativity and are only good at playing around with the information or data they are provided with.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GuyFromSingapore
Who is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
einstein. never heard of the other faggots. goathe i remember vaguely as a writer or something? lol thinking his iq is comparable to that of a theoretical physicist
 
you would have to get them in a room to see who can remember the longest numbers, define the most words, and do the most puzzles
 
you would have to get them in a room to see who can remember the longest numbers, define the most words, and do the most puzzles
von neumann would win this
 
  • +1
Reactions: incel194012940
Merit of work done is too ambiguous ...

The work of GRD is in a league of its own. It's too abstract for even pure mathematics
but being difficult isnt enough by its own or you could have something that is hard to understand but entirely useless as an extreme example

also if von neumann and grothedieck both had zero knowledge of grothendiecks work and were presented with it, von neumann would be able to understand it quicker. so you are arguing intelligence is enitrely creativity
 
First you deny the existence of genders and now you’re denying the existence of IQ. Well maybe you’re right with that one, after seeing you I also stopped believing that IQ exists
 
but being difficult isnt enough by its own or you could have something that is hard to understand but entirely useless as an extreme example

also if von neumann and grothedieck both had zero knowledge of grothendiecks work and were presented with it, von neumann would be able to understand it quicker. so you are arguing intelligence is enitrely creativity
On your 2nd paragraph, we don't know. It's not about who gets to finish the race before everyone else but who gets to explore "places" no else can fathom.

Remember this quote of Schopenhauer

"Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see."
 
  • +1
Reactions: ItsyBitsyJayhawk and mogger123
einstein. never heard of the other faggots. goathe i remember vaguely as a writer or something? lol thinking his iq is comparable to that of a theoretical physicist
People here can't even write a single decent paragraph to express their ideas and you think writing ability has weaker correlation to IQ than mathematical ability ? Nope...

Verbal intelligence is real... and it's as equally important as non verbal intelligence
 
Newton mogs all I'm afraid.
 
Not true

Also not true

Einstein actually made groundbreaking discoveries with regard to how we perceive reality

Grothendieck just made up definitions for some super abstract nerd shit
Math is not making up definitions. Math is like the literal opposite of that you have to prove it all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mr. President

Similar threads

SquareChinOrDeath
Replies
16
Views
265
jonfitz
J
RealNinja
Replies
14
Views
243
RealNinja
RealNinja
Vermilioncore
Replies
3
Views
104
keepcopingboyo
keepcopingboyo
_MVP_
Replies
7
Views
163
Acne Victim
Acne Victim
Suzaku
Replies
6
Views
179
shtbender
shtbender

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top