M
mogger123
jfl
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2022
- Posts
- 3,101
- Reputation
- 3,531
Who is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Einstein
Incorrect. The answer is none of them because iq isn't realGoethe.
Incorrect. The answer is none of them because iq isn't real
But could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?Grothendieck easily tbh
He was a very deep thinker
it is called sub intellect remember the savant that could memorize a book by glancing over it but could not speak a word. LOW IQ you NERDBut could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
Define subintellect in a way that doesn't sound retardedit is called sub intellect remember the savant that could memorize a book by glancing over it but could not speak a word. LOW IQ you NERD
Any autist can calculate lolBut could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
RamerizWho is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
So you know how math and Language are two different things? well, an Iq is not a number to show proficiency in all fields but rather an average of all fields. Due to natural selection, certain parts of the brain become more efficent than others. Thus a Mathematician has the genetics required to logically assess a problem but cannot handle a social situation as easily as a communications major who is 90 IQ. It is all trade offs that come from genetic capitalDefine subintellect in a way that doesn't sound retarded
Not trueAny autist can calculate lol
Also not trueAs for writing, it's pretty subjective
Einstein actually made groundbreaking discoveries with regard to how we perceive realityYeah, he understood reality deeper than Einstein
No, math is language. Jfl not gonna bother reading the rest of you paragraph when your first line is so factually incorrectSo you know how math and Language are two different things? well, an Iq is not a number to show proficiency in all fields but rather an average of all fields. Due to natural selection, certain parts of the brain become more efficent than others. Thus a Mathematician has the genetics required to logically assess a problem but cannot handle a social situation as easily as a communications major who is 90 IQ. It is all trade offs that come from genetic capital
based but he did site that arthur jones studyMike Mentzer
Idk what study? I was joking a bit mentzer took things too far in the end, i'm only doing HIT-litebased but he did site that arthur jones study
Just try thisNot true
Also not true
Einstein actually made groundbreaking discoveries with regard to how we perceive reality
Grothendieck just made up definitions for some super abstract nerd shit
but surely coming up with more eloquent and digestible ideas that have elements of practicality is higher iq?Just try this
Go through the work of all these 4 individuals, and see which makes your mind work the hardest
It will be the work of Grothendieck
It doesn't matter if the work is highly practical or completely theoretical. What matters here is which requires more mental endurance and ability.... the work of Grothendieck is way more complicated compared to the work of Einstein if someone who majored in physics and mathematics with equal understanding and aptitude tried to understand both worksbut surely coming up with more eloquent and digestible ideas that have elements of practicality is higher iq?
when evaluating the merit of work done more goes into it than how difficult it is to followIt doesn't matter if the work is highly practical or completely theoretical. What matters here is which requires more mental endurance and ability.... the work of Grothendieck is way more complicated compared to the work of Einstein if someone who majored in physics and mathematics with equal understanding and aptitude tried to understand both works
OpenheimerWho is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
oppenheimer is midiwt compared to these guysOpenheimer
he cited a study that was basically fraud for an ad campaign to push HIT, I love the guy thoIdk what study? I was joking a bit mentzer took things too far in the end, i'm only doing HIT-lite
The colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machineshe cited a study that was basically fraud for an ad campaign to push HIT, I love the guy tho
exactlyThe colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machines
its a damn shame he tarnished his legacy for thatThe colorado experiment was it that? Yeah it was absurd, arthur jones was businessman i think he just tried to sell his machines
Einstein was a plagiariser. You fell for a nasty Jew goyimBut could he calculate faster than Von Neumann? Or write better than Goethe? Or understand reality deeper than Einstein?
Merit of work done is too ambiguous ...when evaluating the merit of work done more goes into it than how difficult it is to follow
You're a moron.Incorrect. The answer is none of them because iq isn't real
einstein. never heard of the other faggots. goathe i remember vaguely as a writer or something? lol thinking his iq is comparable to that of a theoretical physicistWho is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
von neumann would win thisyou would have to get them in a room to see who can remember the longest numbers, define the most words, and do the most puzzles
but being difficult isnt enough by its own or you could have something that is hard to understand but entirely useless as an extreme exampleMerit of work done is too ambiguous ...
The work of GRD is in a league of its own. It's too abstract for even pure mathematics
On your 2nd paragraph, we don't know. It's not about who gets to finish the race before everyone else but who gets to explore "places" no else can fathom.but being difficult isnt enough by its own or you could have something that is hard to understand but entirely useless as an extreme example
also if von neumann and grothedieck both had zero knowledge of grothendiecks work and were presented with it, von neumann would be able to understand it quicker. so you are arguing intelligence is enitrely creativity
People here can't even write a single decent paragraph to express their ideas and you think writing ability has weaker correlation to IQ than mathematical ability ? Nope...einstein. never heard of the other faggots. goathe i remember vaguely as a writer or something? lol thinking his iq is comparable to that of a theoretical physicist
NeumannWho is smarter; Von Neumann, Einstein, Grothendieck or Goethe?
Math is not making up definitions. Math is like the literal opposite of that you have to prove it all.Not true
Also not true
Einstein actually made groundbreaking discoveries with regard to how we perceive reality
Grothendieck just made up definitions for some super abstract nerd shit