If looks are objective and quantifiable, which is one of the main themes here, why do we never see people here agreeing on someone's rating?

[Altruist]

Very perplexing.

 

[FutureER]

most of people here are trolling

 

[Altruist]

most of people here are trolling

When rating too? What's the point of having an entire subforum just for that then?

 

[looksmaxxed]

most people here are children or ethnics so you cannot hope for them to be objective. they're either easily influenced or incapable of impartiality, overrating fellow deathnik and the like

 

[FutureER]

When rating too? What's the point of having an entire subforum just for that then?

Maybe it's just envy and unwillingness to admit that someone looks better than you

 

[FutureER]

When rating too? What's the point of having an entire subforum just for that then?

The more people rate, the better you can average the ratings and draw a conclusion on how good you look

 

[acme]

rating actually takes a lot of skill. i'll take a basement dwelling sycophant with 20k posts psl 6 rating over my real life experience of being treated as a subhuman any day of the week

probably because people here project their own insecurities, so a chinless psl 4 here who otherwise looks normal will think some fugly fag with 90 degree gonial angle is a chad

 

[Lefor3Laser]

Very perplexing.

After some point it is just about begin gl, nothing else matters, psl irl doesn't always mean gl if with out appeal, you'll just look like a alien (barret).

And others also have preferences, some users would find a masculine chad more attractive and others feminine chads.

Again, does it matter that x is a chad, y is a cl and z is htn when they all get female validation?