if ronaldo wins the wc will the GOAT debate still be alive?

[adriano]

Is it ur junk?

maybe

 

[wojak]

rn it's not looking good for old man, messi has a lot on him. But if he stimmaxxes and wins the 2026 world cup he may be considered the Goat again. i personaly like the bloke so i hope he can pull this off.

thoughts?

@mogs me @kababcel

Why is this debate still going on? Anything that they achieve this late into their playing career should be disregarded. I understand that they're still technically active but surely this is old news at this point. We should talk about the new kids on the block.

Also, I think Messi is the goat but both are different players with different styles. both world class though and there is a reason for the debate to be as popular as it has been.

 

[BeanCelll]

On a second look the list ain’t bad it’s just lewa being in the list and Neymar being higher than Ronaldo

I mean it's the players he watched so guys like van vasten and cruyff are gone but yeah if that's ordered it's a bit iffy, r9 way too low also lewy too high, I respect neymar>dinho though

 

[adriano]

Why is this debate still going on? Anything that they achieve this late into their playing career should be disregarded. I understand that they're still technically active but surely this is old news at this point. We should talk about the new kids on the block.

Also, I think Messi is the goat but both are different players with different styles. both world class though and there is a reason for the debate to be as popular as it has been.

high iq response. also i might make the same sig as you rq if any gov agency finds my account

 

[adriano]

I mean it's the players he watched so guys like van vasten and cruyff are gone but yeah if that's ordered it's a bit iffy, r9 way too low also lewy too high, I respect neymar>dinho though

true

 

[wojak]

high iq response. also i might make the same sig as you rq if any gov agency finds my account

jfl yeah it's better to be safe than sorry

 

[adriano]

@luca_.

 

[adriano]

@unon

 

[adriano]

@BigBallsLarry @Copercel

 

[Copercel]

rn it's not looking good for old man, messi has a lot on him. But if he stimmaxxes and wins the 2026 world cup he may be considered the Goat again. i personaly like the bloke so i hope he can pull this off.

thoughts?

@mogs me @kababcel

Messi will always be better

 

[adriano]

Messi will always be better

last chance for ronaldo is this year ngl

 

[adriano]

@Old Büll

 

[barambo]

last chance for ronaldo is this year ngl

true. he gettin old bruh

 

[yoyoyo123123]

I hate when people say ronaldo can't can't compare to Messi and there's no goat debate, like he's still comparable to Messi, yea Messis better but some ppl act like ronaldo , most goals in football history, can't even be compared to Messi, even if Messis better still

 

[wojak]

high iq response. also i might make the same sig as you rq if any gov agency finds my account

TLDR: Do not copy and paste my signature and use it as your own. Copy it then paste it into a text editor, make your changes and then paste it back into .Org.

You can ignore this if you want but I'll say it anyway as it could be important:

If you're going to use my signature but change a few words here and there, there's a possibility that the text carries meta data - i'm unsure because I can't see into the back-end. It's extremely unlikely but i'll explain why it's best to copy and paste it into a separate text editor, make your changes, then paste it back into .org.

Basically, the potential meta data that the text can carry would be code explaining the properties of the text (rich text) so any fonts, colors, any hyperlinks and even the html/css structure would be visible through the back-end of the site.

Technically, if somebody wanted to cross-reference your signature to mine it would be extremely difficult with this alone. The reason i'm telling you this is not just to do with the possibility of somebody seeing the rich text properties in the back-end. The actual problem is .Org has a plagiarism checker integrated inside. Although we can't see into the back-end I figured this out because I checked out the "Looksmaxxing Questions" forum and when I attempted to type out the title for my thread it scanned the forum for similar words which is a feature that's there in an effort to stop questions which have already been answered. It's safe to assume the plagiarism checker can be used elsewhere in the site, despite not being visible on the front-end.

The reason I'm saying this, although it's overkill and panicfuel, if somebody was to intercept and view the backend code and they saw your signature it would be cross-referenced to mine and your "disclaimer" which admits to all content essentially being satirical/voids you from any repercussions wouldn't hold up and if you have posted anything that nets you jail time, you wouldn't get off as easy as you think.

I know you're probably joking but I thought about what you said and I wanted to say this just incase. Also I'm not claiming to know the back-end of .Org at all this is all possibilities and like I said it's better to be safe.

 

[Saint Casanova]

England is winning the World Cup next year

 

[luca_.]

I don’t like watching football because it hurts

 

[wsada]