If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

[Aladin]

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent.

So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor, innocent "child," and they deserve to go to prison for a long time.

Of course, SJWs haven't decided what "consent" means, so they might say the adult is only guilty of rape if they verbally give an enthusiastic, "yes, I want to have sex with you!" If they just quietly reciprocate and have an orgasm, then they were still "raped."

I think I speak for all of us when I say I wish a Stacy teacher had "raped" me when I was a teenager. I would have vastly preferred that to being bullied.

There's this phenomenon where adults forget what it was like to be a kid. They forget that while the average kid is even dumber than the average adult, many of them are still complete assholes.

No, teenage Chad douchebags are not mentally traumatized if they bang a hot Stacy teacher. They're bragging to all of their friends and then bullying the incels. The only part that might traumatize them is their parents turning it into a court case.

It's also laughable how we police sex this way. Teenagers can't legally consent to sex with an adult, but they can consent to an adult flunking them out of school and ensuring they won't ever work for much more than minimum wage. When they're 16, they can drive a car and consent to driving off a bridge, but they can't consent to an orgasm with someone 18+.

NPC programming is absurd.

Original thread:

If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent. So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor...

incels.is

 

[trvechud]

High iq ngl

 

[vvd]

mirin

 

[2414763h]

Bro logical fallacy within the system.

 

[Regular guy ltn]

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent.

So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor, innocent "child," and they deserve to go to prison for a long time.

Of course, SJWs haven't decided what "consent" means, so they might say the adult is only guilty of rape if they verbally give an enthusiastic, "yes, I want to have sex with you!" If they just quietly reciprocate and have an orgasm, then they were still "raped."

I think I speak for all of us when I say I wish a Stacy teacher had "raped" me when I was a teenager. I would have vastly preferred that to being bullied.

There's this phenomenon where adults forget what it was like to be a kid. They forget that while the average kid is even dumber than the average adult, many of them are still complete assholes.

No, teenage Chad douchebags are not mentally traumatized if they bang a hot Stacy teacher. They're bragging to all of their friends and then bullying the incels. The only part that might traumatize them is their parents turning it into a court case.

It's also laughable how we police sex this way. Teenagers can't legally consent to sex with an adult, but they can consent to an adult flunking them out of school and ensuring they won't ever work for much more than minimum wage. When they're 16, they can drive a car and consent to driving off a bridge, but they can't consent to an orgasm with someone 18+.

NPC programming is absurd.

Original thread:

If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent. So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor...

incels.is

What the fuck is this caption

 

[Сигма Бой]

Sex never demands consent.

 

[Aladin]

Bro logical fallacy within the system.

?

What the fuck is this caption

?

Sex never demands consent.

?

 

[2414763h]

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent.

So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor, innocent "child," and they deserve to go to prison for a long time.

Of course, SJWs haven't decided what "consent" means, so they might say the adult is only guilty of rape if they verbally give an enthusiastic, "yes, I want to have sex with you!" If they just quietly reciprocate and have an orgasm, then they were still "raped."

I think I speak for all of us when I say I wish a Stacy teacher had "raped" me when I was a teenager. I would have vastly preferred that to being bullied.

There's this phenomenon where adults forget what it was like to be a kid. They forget that while the average kid is even dumber than the average adult, many of them are still complete assholes.

No, teenage Chad douchebags are not mentally traumatized if they bang a hot Stacy teacher. They're bragging to all of their friends and then bullying the incels. The only part that might traumatize them is their parents turning it into a court case.

It's also laughable how we police sex this way. Teenagers can't legally consent to sex with an adult, but they can consent to an adult flunking them out of school and ensuring they won't ever work for much more than minimum wage. When they're 16, they can drive a car and consent to driving off a bridge, but they can't consent to an orgasm with someone 18+.

NPC programming is absurd.

Original thread:

If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent. So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor...

incels.is

Wait my friend my age fucked a 20 year old Pakistani women?? Well in the UK age of consent is 16 but it’s weird because apparently even though they can give consent they cannot have sex with someone who is 18 or older

 

[Regular guy ltn]

Sex never demands consent.

La la la I think I'm reading it wrong elaborate

 

[Сигма Бой]

?

?

?

Questions ourselves.

 

[2414763h]

?

?

?

As in within the system they have no mention of this

 

[Сигма Бой]

View attachment 3906442
La la la I think I'm reading it wrong elaborate

Y4

 

[Regular guy ltn]

Wait my friend my age fucked a 20 year old Pakistani women?? Well in the UK age of consent is 16 but it’s weird because apparently even though they can give consent they cannot have sex with someone who is 18 or older

That was always weird for me

 

[Regular guy ltn]

Y4

Братан это же пиздец

 

[Aladin]

As in within the system they have no mention of this

Logical fallacies?

 

[asdvek]

If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents

then that's not rape anymore you retard if there is consent

 

[2414763h]

Logical fallacies?

They system around consent has a logical fallacy because it doesn’t account for this possibly and the law around consent and giving consent can be worked around.

 

[2414763h]

That was always weird for me

I know right

 

[Aladin]

then that's not rape anymore you retard if there is consent

Dude you cropped the post holy shit you’re the retard.

 

[Iraniancel]

The entire .is "Must Read" section needs to be published here. 9/10 "people" here are not blackpilled.

 

[Aladin]

The entire .is "Must Read" section needs to be published here. 9/10 "people" here are not blackpilled.

This thread isn’t in must read but it’s genius.

 

[Aladin]

They system around consent has a logical fallacy because it doesn’t account for this possibly and the law around consent and giving consent can be worked around.

There are far more logical fallacies with their system of consent.

 

[ProjectWeaponX]

The entire .is "Must Read" section needs to be published here. 9/10 "people" here are not blackpilled.

I’m a sub 5 incel so I don’t have to worry about sex

 

[TiktokUser]

Also the fact that they call any teenage girl under 20 a “child”, just so they can label an older guy who finds her attractive as a pedophile

This soon to be OF whore is 17 and wears/dances in suggestive clothing yet all the normie commenters are still calling her a child.

This post also sums it up pretty well

"Females are children at 18 but males are adults at 18"

I'm 19 so I'm not biased I noticed on the Internet a surprisingly large amount of people say the age of consent should be increased to 20-21 and that girls are children at 18 and underdeveloped and were just 17 and a lot of them are still in highschool therefore they are still children and if...

looksmax.org

 

[Aladin]

Also the fact that they call any teenage girl under 20 a “child”, just so they can label an older guy who finds her attractive as a pedophile

This soon to be OF whore is 17 and wears/dances in suggestive clothing yet all the normie commenters are still calling her a child.

View attachment 3906597View attachment 3906598


This post also sums it up pretty well

"Females are children at 18 but males are adults at 18"

I'm 19 so I'm not biased I noticed on the Internet a surprisingly large amount of people say the age of consent should be increased to 20-21 and that girls are children at 18 and underdeveloped and were just 17 and a lot of them are still in highschool therefore they are still children and if...

looksmax.org

Normies are retarded.

 

[Aladin]

Bump

 

[Meteor21]

This enthusiastic consent shit was created by autistic SJWs that can't read social cues. And so women can revoke consent after the fact. But they'd still side with a woman who did enthusiastically consent but regretted it after the fact.

 

[Aladin]

This enthusiastic consent shit was created by autistic SJWs that can't read social cues. And so women can revoke consent after the fact. But they'd still side with a woman who did enthusiastically consent but regretted it after the fact.

No it was created via satan.

 

[laworg]

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent.

So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor, innocent "child," and they deserve to go to prison for a long time.

Of course, SJWs haven't decided what "consent" means, so they might say the adult is only guilty of rape if they verbally give an enthusiastic, "yes, I want to have sex with you!" If they just quietly reciprocate and have an orgasm, then they were still "raped."

I think I speak for all of us when I say I wish a Stacy teacher had "raped" me when I was a teenager. I would have vastly preferred that to being bullied.

There's this phenomenon where adults forget what it was like to be a kid. They forget that while the average kid is even dumber than the average adult, many of them are still complete assholes.

No, teenage Chad douchebags are not mentally traumatized if they bang a hot Stacy teacher. They're bragging to all of their friends and then bullying the incels. The only part that might traumatize them is their parents turning it into a court case.

It's also laughable how we police sex this way. Teenagers can't legally consent to sex with an adult, but they can consent to an adult flunking them out of school and ensuring they won't ever work for much more than minimum wage. When they're 16, they can drive a car and consent to driving off a bridge, but they can't consent to an orgasm with someone 18+.

NPC programming is absurd.

Original thread:

If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent. So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor...

incels.is

Good thread

 

[RODEBLUR]

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent.

So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor, innocent "child," and they deserve to go to prison for a long time.

Of course, SJWs haven't decided what "consent" means, so they might say the adult is only guilty of rape if they verbally give an enthusiastic, "yes, I want to have sex with you!" If they just quietly reciprocate and have an orgasm, then they were still "raped."

I think I speak for all of us when I say I wish a Stacy teacher had "raped" me when I was a teenager. I would have vastly preferred that to being bullied.

There's this phenomenon where adults forget what it was like to be a kid. They forget that while the average kid is even dumber than the average adult, many of them are still complete assholes.

No, teenage Chad douchebags are not mentally traumatized if they bang a hot Stacy teacher. They're bragging to all of their friends and then bullying the incels. The only part that might traumatize them is their parents turning it into a court case.

It's also laughable how we police sex this way. Teenagers can't legally consent to sex with an adult, but they can consent to an adult flunking them out of school and ensuring they won't ever work for much more than minimum wage. When they're 16, they can drive a car and consent to driving off a bridge, but they can't consent to an orgasm with someone 18+.

NPC programming is absurd.

Original thread:

If teenagers can't consent to sex, how is it that they're able to rape adults?

I would think that being able to rape someone is proof that they can consent. So think about this: If a teenager tries to rape an adult, and the adult consents, then the adult "raped" the poor, innocent "child." But as long as the adult doesn't consent, the teenager is no longer a poor...

incels.is

Dnr but probably true

 

[epicmogger123]

Because law is really hard to officially make. Situations of all kind are extremely different from each other and its hard to put 100% strict barriers, but with our system we kinda need to do that. Because technically it would be better to have a neutral judge look at cases but thats impossible since judges are human and get influenced or can be corrupt. This doesnt mean "fuck the law" tho

 

[Aladin]

Because law is really hard to officially make. Situations of all kind are extremely different from each other and its hard to put 100% strict barriers, but with our system we kinda need to do that. Because technically it would be better to have a neutral judge look at cases but thats impossible since judges are human and get influenced or can be corrupt. This doesnt mean "fuck the law" tho

This doesn’t answer the question.

 

[epicmogger123]

The answer is that just because the law says so doesnt mean that it factually is that way, and the law isnt very precise and hard to make. If we gave 13yo the ability to consent that would be stupid because not 100% of 13 yo are able to make that decision. On the other hand, some can make that decision and also rape. Not every person that has sth in common with someone else is the same. Youre thinking wrong if you put all teenagers into one box and think of them as a single person

 

[Aladin]

The answer is that just because the law says so doesnt mean that it factually is that way

So teenagers can consent to sex with adults, we just don’t make it legal?

Is it that hard for people to acknowledge?

 

[epicmogger123]

So teenagers can consent to sex with adults, we just don’t make it legal?

Is it that hard for people to acknowledge?

keyword:some. Some teens.

 

[Aladin]

keyword:some. Some teens.

All teens. In the eyes of God, willing sex = sin and thus CONSENT of the will.

 

[epicmogger123]

here comes mr religion

All teens. In the eyes of God, willing sex = sin and thus CONSENT of the will.

 

[Aladin]

here comes mr religion

Christians on this forum shy away when I pull out that argument because they know it’s unbeatable.

 

[epicmogger123]

All teens. In the eyes of God, willing sex = sin and thus CONSENT of the will.

The word of god is apparently also the stuff that dudes wrote who didnt even know jesus and that the guy walked on water which was a very usual saying for good people in a story around that time if ur christian, and if ur a muslim, the all knowing, perfect god kinda slipped up when he released the bible cuz mfs messed it up so he had to fix it because the all knowing all perfect god made a mistaje

 

[epicmogger123]

Christians on this forum shy away when I pull out that argument because they know it’s unbeatable.

I thought ur christian? why are you using god as an argument

 

[lowiqcel__.]

Consent doesnt matter much for men , the secret is to have a good lawyer and strong legs

 

[slaters]

Wait a minute

 

[Aladin]

I thought ur christian? why are you using god as an argument

I am. Why would I not use God in an argument?

 

[Meteor21]

No it was created via satan.

They are satan

 

[kiing_ronk]

The word of god is apparently also the stuff that dudes wrote who didnt even know jesus and that the guy walked on water which was a very usual saying for good people in a story around that time if ur christian, and if ur a muslim, the all knowing, perfect god kinda slipped up when he released the bible cuz mfs messed it up so he had to fix it because the all knowing all perfect god made a mistaje

U needa use punctuation but I understand what ur saying

 

[newgen/cel]

niggas never heard of a morally grey area

 

[Aladin]

niggas never heard of a morally grey area

no dude this thread is a question.

 

[Aladin]

@Manchild_v2 @MoggerGaston @IAMNOTANINCEL @ProjectWeaponX @got.daim @Primalsplit @Debetro

 

[Manchild_v2]

there's a difference between statutory rape and violent rape

 

[Aladin]

there's a difference between statutory rape and violent rape

Elab further. How can the teenager be responsible for sexual decisions in form A but not form B?