If women prefer dating tall men, why do short men even still exist

[ElloinmorninJ]

From an evolutionary standpoint, should any short genes be wiped out due to them being selected against- especially since preferring height is a biological ingrained thing, how do small genes persist

 

[randomuser2407]

Tall men have sex with short women. As a result, they make children who are either short, average or tall.

It is only for women that height is an important factor to determine a man's attractiveness.

Most men don't care about the height of a woman.

 

[Deleted member 15004]

regression to the mean

 

[loksr]

women prefer dating good looking men first and foremost
if you're anywhere above turbo manlet and good looking you'll be fine
tall is a boost obviously but it's not even remotely comparable to being good looking

 

[goldensoul]

Tall men have sex with short women. As a result, they make children who are either short, average or tall.

It is only for women that height is an important factor to determine a man's attractiveness.

Most men don't care about the height of a woman.

tbh height matters for women too. tall women have some sexy aura that short ones don't have. she needs to be good-looking if she's short. but yea it matters way more for men.

 

[chigoha]

same reason why ugly men still exist

ugly men genes are selected against but ugly women still spread their genes so as long as it only goes on one way , incels will still exist

 

[randomuser2407]

tbh height matters for women too. tall women have some sexy aura that short ones don't have. she needs to be good-looking if she's short. but yea it matters way more for men.

Yes, as a 6'4" guy, I care a lot about the height of a woman and my ideal partner is 5 foot 10 or above, but I know that I am very unlikely to find a girl like that because they are rare, but if I were to have children, I would want a woman who is very tall.

 

[eyebagcel]

cuz dating now isn’tlike it was for the past 1000 years and women got raped or forced into marriage

 

[Schery6]

Short foids and ugly foids, they need to be sterilized to cure the world of inceldom

 

[Lux]

there's a ~4-inch difference from your genetic average that is completely environmental. Cals, protein consumption, bf, etc. & female height doesn't matter smv wise so short girls pass on genetics. Average height has shot up as well if you look back 100 yrs the average dude was 5'7 now it's 5'10.

 

[Tobias Fünke]

Because height is relative. In a way short men are being weeded out; it's just that the average height is increasing. In a century, 6 foot may be seen as short.

 

[Deleted member 16758]

Luck

 

[currylightskin]

coz of femlet stacies

 

[Nerian]

For thousands of years since the advent of agriculture, women have not been able to choose their mates purely on looks because they needed a man for material survival, protection and social status (being unmarried used to carry a big stigma). However, what we are seeing is a return to pre-agricultural, pre-civilizational mate selection, which constitutes a much longer period of time in human evolution (90,000 years instead of 10,000 years)

But in the past, men died very often in tribal warfare and hunts, so only the most robust men would even survive, and there was relatively less men around for women to choose. As a result, the surviving men didn't have to compete with one another that hard, and some could have several wives without other men having none.

But in post-industrial society, men don't die off, and in fact the ratio of men to women is higher at 1.05 to 1. Furthermore, a lot of genetic degradation has occurred due to technology letting weak genes survive to adulthood. On top of that again, women are the reproductive bottleneck so the bar is much lower for women being sexually desirable by men, so even if they too are genetically degraded, they still get male attention. On top of that, there's such high competition for desirable women due to the sexual marketplace focusing on looks that genetically degraded women get yet another boost of value in the sexual market place. Everything is in women's favour. This entire civilization is designed to make women comfortable and happy.

This is an aside, but think about the economy in the first world. It is almost entirely about making women happy. Go to any large shopping center and simply count how many of the stores are selling products targeted at women. MOST OF THEM. What do men work so hard for? We don't really need that much to be happy. We want money mainly to impress women. We either buy things for women directly or buy stuff that makes us more appealing to women. Women also mainly dress up to impress other women. Example: doing their nails. No man gives a damn about long nails.

 

[Deleted member 8869]

From an evolutionary standpoint, should any short genes be wiped out due to them being selected against- especially since preferring height is a biological ingrained thing, how do small genes persist

because short women exist.

 

[Deusmaximus]

Girls fuck with hot tall guys 2 points above them and around late 20s get married+pregnant with their manlet looksmatch.

 

[Deleted member 17345]

my wife has to be at least 5'10

 

[Deleted member 17308]

women prefer dating good looking men first and foremost
if you're anywhere above turbo manlet and good looking you'll be fine
tall is a boost obviously but it's not even remotely comparable to being good looking

According to that all manlets should be good looking but it's far from reality, I think the real reason is that most manlets still get laid and make families, plus tall western countries like the Netherlands people barely have kids nowdays while third world manlet countries like Bangladesh have a huge population boom

 

[loksr]

According to that all manlets should be good looking but it's far from reality, I think the real reason is that most manlets still get laid and make families, plus tall western countries like the Netherlands people barely have kids nowdays while third world manlet countries like Bangladesh have a huge population boom

Being good looking doesn’t guarantee that your kids will be good looking, that’s not how it works.

 

[gaymidget]

Because taller isnt always an advantage, especially pre agriculture. Bigger men need more calories, more protein and have higher chance of dying. Also, we preceive the difference between 185cm and 175cm to be a lot in a societal context but in nature, its not much. Its like a margin of error that occurs when predicting the height of a future child. Some turn out to be 185 and considered tall and others turned out to be 175 considered small with the same genetic parents.

 

[AefreTreow]

Jfc if you fell for the evolution meme

 

[Deleted member 18808]

For thousands of years since the advent of agriculture, women have not been able to choose their mates purely on looks because they needed a man for material survival, protection and social status (being unmarried used to carry a big stigma). However, what we are seeing is a return to pre-agricultural, pre-civilizational mate selection, which constitutes a much longer period of time in human evolution (90,000 years instead of 10,000 years)

But in the past, men died very often in tribal warfare and hunts, so only the most robust men would even survive, and there was relatively less men around for women to choose. As a result, the surviving men didn't have to compete with one another that hard, and some could have several wives without other men having none.

But in post-industrial society, men don't die off, and in fact the ratio of men to women is higher at 1.05 to 1. Furthermore, a lot of genetic degradation has occurred due to technology letting weak genes survive to adulthood. On top of that again, women are the reproductive bottleneck so the bar is much lower for women being sexually desirable by men, so even if they too are genetically degraded, they still get male attention. On top of that, there's such high competition for desirable women due to the sexual marketplace focusing on looks that genetically degraded women get yet another boost of value in the sexual market place. Everything is in women's favour. This entire civilization is designed to make women comfortable and happy.

This is an aside, but think about the economy in the first world. It is almost entirely about making women happy. Go to any large shopping center and simply count how many of the stores are selling products targeted at women. MOST OF THEM. What do men work so hard for? We don't really need that much to be happy. We want money mainly to impress women. We either buy things for women directly or buy stuff that makes us more appealing to women. Women also mainly dress up to impress other women. Example: doing their nails. No man gives a damn about long nails.

You are way too blackpilled you have scarred my mind with this information holy shit. Like why do I even need to know this. Just over.

 

[XAE17]

In a century, 6 foot may be seen as short.

blackpill autism

 

[JizzFarmer]

Being short is relative. Height has gradually increased partially due to women selecting taller men to reproduce with. In 100 years, 6ft will be short.

 

[Johnnybegood]

Being good looking doesn’t guarantee that your kids will be good looking, that’s not how it works.

So, its all just luck? Surely if both parents are equally good looking the children will be ar least above average.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Genetic variation, hgh deficiencies, estrogen.
Netherlands just had sexual selection make it tall

 

[TheAnomaly]

Just be taller than her.

 

[Deleted member 18503]

From an evolutionary standpoint, should any short genes be wiped out due to them being selected against- especially since preferring height is a biological ingrained thing, how do small genes persist

I feel like majority of childrens heights depend more on their mother

 

[AlexanderTheGreat]

Because height is relative. In a way short men are being weeded out; it's just that the average height is increasing. In a century, 6 foot may be seen as short.

Plain no. It's actually going the opposite way right now.

Height like all variables goes through cycles, and it seems to be inclining towards the downward trend. Among the many times this change was happening was when hunter-gatherers were beginning to settle in societies, and doing farming.