DownwardGrowthCel
Total Forward Growth Death
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2025
- Posts
- 3,645
- Reputation
- 7,144
They're literally the opposite to each other
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
so accepting your looks and how over it is, is the next step to improve your looks?looksmaxxing is literally the logical next step of bp
It’s not really accepting is it.so accepting your looks and how over it is, is the next step to improve your looks?![]()
LM is greypill : trying to be better not redpill : being the alpha male and those stuff abt girlsBy definition yeah but I guess it’s just a way to define the community looksmaxxing is redpill but they still sort of go together in the sense of looks matter
What’s with you people and saying blackpillers roped lolThis site is redpilled
The so-called “blackpillers” have already roped
that’s all you deduced the bp too?so accepting your looks and how over it is, is the next step to improve your looks?![]()
its rarely over, most guys who get treated badly are LTNs and can get to at least MTN. there genuinely arent that many true sub 5s on this websiteso accepting your looks and how over it is, is the next step to improve your looks?![]()
they are more stastically likely to rope, especially if you look at the statistics of short men, but i do agree its an overgeneralisationWhat’s with you people and saying blackpillers roped lol
They’re just living a low quality life
your analogy actually proves my point. if a resource is partly luck-based, then constantly thinking about the luck component has the lowest ROI possible. once you've identified the controllable variables, obsessing over the uncontrollable ones is irrational.that’s all you deduced the bp too?
say there is a rare resource in the world, this resource is mostly luck based, but there is some components that are controllable, the resource matters, you learn about the resource, the instinctive next step is going about acquiring as much as u can

what? did u not read it… at all?your analogy actually proves my point. if a resource is partly luck-based, then constantly thinking about the luck component has the lowest ROI possible. once you've identified the controllable variables, obsessing over the uncontrollable ones is irrational.![]()