If you don’t descend from warriors and aren’t mixed with Greeks

D

Deleted member 23558

God make my neurotransmitters great inc
Joined
Nov 3, 2022
Posts
64,754
Reputation
91,831
Give up.

“From the Vishnu Purana and other Puranas, one understands that although basically of Brahmin origin, a branch of Gargas became Kshatriyas and migrated westwards and joined the Yavanas (i.e. Ionians/Greeks). This could be the reason that later day Indians referred to Greek mathematicians and astronomers as Gargacharyas.”


Garga Muni author of Garga samhita was born to Rishi Bharadwaja and Suseela. He was a Brahma-Kshatriyas or what we call Warrior Brahmins, who have a Kshatriya charateristic as their mother is one. According to Anuloma marriage though the father is technically a Brahmin the child sort of inherits the kshatriya traits from their mothers.“
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: justinzayn and OGJBSLAYER
we wuz kangz
 
Nordic aryan or bust
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16275 and OGJBSLAYER
@OGJBSLAYER @Manletmachine @Debetro
@forevergymcelling
 
  • +1
Reactions: OGJBSLAYER
In the cosmos all things present at the same time an aspect of simplicity and an aspect of complexity, and in every sphere there are perspectives related to either the one or the other of these aspects ; synthesis and analysis alike are in the nature of things, and this is true of human societies as of other orders; it is therefore impossible that castes be found nowhere, or that they nowhere be absent.

Strictly speaking Hinduism has no ‘dogmas’, in the sense that in it every concept may be denied provided the argument is intrinsically true; but this absence of ‘irremovable’ dogmas in the strict sense at the same stroke prevents social unification. What makes such unification possible, in particular in the monotheistic religions, is precisely dogma which serves as a transcendent Knowledge accessible to all. If to the majority of men Knowledge as such is inaccessible, it yet imposes itself on all in the form of faith, so that the believer is something like a virtual or symbolical brahmin. The exclusiveness of the brahmin in regard to the other castes is repeated, mutatis mutandis, in the exclusiveness of the believer in regard to unbelievers or to the ‘unfaithful’; in both cases it is ‘Knowledge’ which excludes, whether it be a matter of hereditary aptitude for pure Knowledge or the fact of a symbolical and virtual knowledge, that is to say a religious belief. But both in the case of a revealed faith and in that of an instituted caste, the exclusion –conditional and ‘offensive’ in the former case and unconditional and ‘defensive’ in the latter may be only ‘formal’ and not ‘essential’, for every saint is a ‘believer’ whatever his religion and a ‘brahmin’ whatever his caste. It should perhaps be made clear as regards dogmas that the doctrinal pillars of Hinduism are in part ‘variable dogmas’; which is to say that they lose their absolute quality at higher levels while preserving it unshakably on the level to which they relate, aside from all question of legitimate divergences of perspective. But in all this no door is left open to intrinsic error, for otherwise the tradition would lose the very reason for its existence. Once we discern between the true and the false, ‘heresy’ becomes possible, whatever may be our own reaction to it; it corresponds on the level of ideas to material error on the level of facts.

In its spiritual sense, caste is the ‘law’ or dharma governing a particular category of men in accord with their qualifications. It is in this sense, and only in this sense, that the Bhagavad-gita says: ‘Better for each one is his own law of action, even if imperfect, than the law of another, even well applied. It is better to perish in one's own law; it is perilous to follow the law of another’ (III, 35). 21 And similarly the Manava-Dharma Shastra says: ‘It is better to carry out one's own proper functions in a defective manner than to fulfil perfectly those of another; for he who lives accomplishing the duties of another caste forthwith loses his own’ (X, 97).

Caste and Races by Schuon
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
Im actually a descendant of the gallowglass that's my only cope being scottish
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 23558
my ancestors were warriors i can just tell. im too volatile and ADHD to not have hunter genetics with good reflexes and coordination, random normies have literally told me "u are a warrior bro"
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16275, Deleted member 23391 and Deleted member 23558
@justinzayn @pessimistic
 
  • +1
Reactions: justinzayn

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top