If your cycle decisions are influenced by money, don't start a cycle.

aids

aids

Philanthropist, Gymcel Era
Joined
Jul 5, 2024
Posts
9,108
Reputation
18,203
Imagine not having the ancillaries on hand, or electing to purchase only particular compounds because you don't have the money for a cycle.

Starting a cycle is a luxury; it is a privilege that not everybody has. You don't rush into it just because you think you need to start a cycle ASAP since everybody else is taking stuff.

Plan your shit out, and if you don't have the money, make the money, then start your cycle once you have everything you might need. It's not like cycles are prohibitively expensive anyway.

Further, if you won't take particular compounds because you have arbitrary inhibitions e.g., you don't want to inject yourself so you will instead opt for solely orally-administered pharmaceuticals, then you are not just wasting time, you are doing yourself a disservice. You also should not just take something because you heard it's good, so many people have absolutely zero clue about the pharmacokinetics of the things they take, rather only an extremely general recognition of effects and side effects.

People that ask for advice prefacing that they don't want to inject, only have x amount of money, etc., should not have their questions entertained because they are implicitly too naive.
 
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Micrognathic, Org3cel, فاشل and 13 others
dnr blasting 500mg mast + finasteride as we speak :feelsgood:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Micrognathic, 1nonlymogs, Aryan Incel and 8 others
dnr blasting 500mg mast + finasteride as we speak :feelsgood:
Make sure to add anavar bro I heard it's good and only mild hepatotoxicity :geek:
DON'T FORGET GOOD FR COLLAGEN BRO
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Aryan Incel, Striated, Jeremy Meeks and 2 others
DNR gonna run Superdrol only for 12 weeks because I’m too much of a pussy to pin, I heard that it’s one of the unhealthies orals but we BPed boyzzz will do anything for the ascension:feelsuhh:
 
  • +1
Reactions: 1nonlymogs, ssxjdgh and aids
But seriously this is a good post which should be water, but I have a feeling it isn’t.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Micrognathic and aids
Man, if one is too pussy to do* a simple IM injection, I would* advise him to stay away from AAS and stick to being a natty cuck.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Aryan Incel, Jeremy Meeks and aids
Man, if one is too pussy to so a simple IM injection, I aould advise him to stay away from AAS and stick to being a natty cuck.
If one wants to opt for orally-administered pharmaceuticals that would be orally-administered in any context, and not inferior to/in substitute of another pharmaceutical, e.g., isotretinoin, then it's fine.
But yes, if you are substituting something with an oral compound because you don't want to pin, NGMI.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Micrognathic, Aryan Incel, Striated and 2 others
Imagine not having the ancillaries on hand, or electing to purchase only particular compounds because you don't have the money for a cycle.

Starting a cycle is a luxury; it is a privilege that not everybody has. You don't rush into it just because you think you need to start a cycle ASAP since everybody else is taking stuff.

Plan your shit out, and if you don't have the money, make the money, then start your cycle once you have everything you might need. It's not like cycles are prohibitively expensive anyway.

Further, if you won't take particular compounds because you have arbitrary inhibitions e.g., you don't want to inject yourself so you will instead opt for solely orally-administered pharmaceuticals, then you are not just wasting time, you are doing yourself a disservice. You also should not just take something because you heard it's good, so many people have absolutely zero clue about the pharmacokinetics of the things they take, rather only an extremely general recognition of effects and side effects.

People that ask for advice prefacing that they don't want to inject, only have x amount of money, etc., should not have their questions entertained because they are implicitly too naive.
It doesn't cost much if you find a good, reputable, cheap source
 
  • JFL
Reactions: aids
If one wants to opt for orally-administered pharmaceuticals that would be orally-administered in any context, and not inferior to/in substitute of another pharmaceutical, e.g., isotretinoin, then it's fine.
But yes, if you are substituting something with an oral compound because you don't want to pin, NGMI.
I have yet to start using needles just because I feel like I’ll be to inconsistent pinning a bunch of sht, only thing I’m about to pin soon is TRT
 
I have yet to start using needles just because I feel like I’ll be to inconsistent pinning a bunch of sht, only thing I’m about to pin soon is TRT
user is likely to ruin his fertility function
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Aryan Incel
user is likely to ruin his fertility function
at this point I don’t really care anymore man, the body dysmorphia is my biggest concern
 
It doesn't cost much if you find a good, reputable, cheap source
No shit retard.

I have yet to start using needles just because I feel like I’ll be to inconsistent pinning a bunch of sht, only thing I’m about to pin soon is TRT
Ok, then you clearly don’t want it bad enough.
TRT still needs consistency.

user is likely to ruin his fertility function
Retarded arbitrary take. 100% of people that abuse AAS/TRT can regain spermatogenesis.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aryan Incel and iflookscouldk1ll
Reading all these nonsense words has made me thank God that i was born pretty and won’t need any of this
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: aids
  • +1
Reactions: mohito
Imagine not having the ancillaries on hand, or electing to purchase only particular compounds because you don't have the money for a cycle.

Starting a cycle is a luxury; it is a privilege that not everybody has. You don't rush into it just because you think you need to start a cycle ASAP since everybody else is taking stuff.

Plan your shit out, and if you don't have the money, make the money, then start your cycle once you have everything you might need. It's not like cycles are prohibitively expensive anyway.

Further, if you won't take particular compounds because you have arbitrary inhibitions e.g., you don't want to inject yourself so you will instead opt for solely orally-administered pharmaceuticals, then you are not just wasting time, you are doing yourself a disservice. You also should not just take something because you heard it's good, so many people have absolutely zero clue about the pharmacokinetics of the things they take, rather only an extremely general recognition of effects and side effects.

People that ask for advice prefacing that they don't want to inject, only have x amount of money, etc., should not have their questions entertained because they are implicitly too naive.
Horrible advice hop ASAP.
 

Similar threads

epsilonic
Replies
103
Views
882
greydud41
greydud41
lurking00214
Replies
11
Views
283
Ch1gga
Ch1gga
Faustum
Replies
25
Views
374
Faustum
Faustum
gihk342
Replies
88
Views
942
gihk342
gihk342

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top