TalesFromTheSlums
Too high IQ to post here or waste any time anymore
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2025
- Posts
- 1,417
- Reputation
- 3,406
Popularity on the internet is the Pandora's Box or nail in the coffin for time monogamy.
Unless you're WAY MORE popular, having a "girlfriend" who has friends, following is a death sentence.
Especially if she has what's known as a "group" (multiple close girlfriends/strong ingroup).
It means there are people watching her every move.
It means people will be there to tell her "she can do better."
It means her choice in you wasn't based on true carnal interest but on feedback sufficiency.
You guys just have to realize ... If a girl actually has some legit following on social media...
It just means she has a judgment team assessing her every choice.
Friends, strangers, family will be giving input toward her choices.
This is why social media ultimately is shit ... Lets people too "in" to others.
The more of a following she has the more likely this will occur.
The more likely she will begin to question her decisions & have outside influence pressure her.
Meanwhile with no real following nor a real friend circle, who really judges?
No close friends? No toxic friends? No eyeballs all over her?
If she has over 100 followers & follows very few herself, it's borderline over at that point.
You need to girlfriend girls who don't use much social media nor have any "group."
That means no followers, friends, family always chiming in & judging you or others.
So a LEGIT social media following girl ... Never a choice for a girlfriend, sorry.
You're better off dating Amish girls or something.
May still cheat but at least 100s online won't know you're a cuck.
So in summary: The only "ideal girlfriend" must:
#1. Have no social media.
#2. Have no friends or group.
#3. Have no car.
#4. Live with her parents.
#5. Be ugly enough to not be hit on.
If all of the above conditions cannot be met, don't have a "girlfriend."
Situationships only.
looksmax.org
Unless you're WAY MORE popular, having a "girlfriend" who has friends, following is a death sentence.
Especially if she has what's known as a "group" (multiple close girlfriends/strong ingroup).
It means there are people watching her every move.
It means people will be there to tell her "she can do better."
It means her choice in you wasn't based on true carnal interest but on feedback sufficiency.
You guys just have to realize ... If a girl actually has some legit following on social media...
It just means she has a judgment team assessing her every choice.
Friends, strangers, family will be giving input toward her choices.
This is why social media ultimately is shit ... Lets people too "in" to others.
The more of a following she has the more likely this will occur.
The more likely she will begin to question her decisions & have outside influence pressure her.
Meanwhile with no real following nor a real friend circle, who really judges?
No close friends? No toxic friends? No eyeballs all over her?
If she has over 100 followers & follows very few herself, it's borderline over at that point.
You need to girlfriend girls who don't use much social media nor have any "group."
That means no followers, friends, family always chiming in & judging you or others.
So a LEGIT social media following girl ... Never a choice for a girlfriend, sorry.
You're better off dating Amish girls or something.
May still cheat but at least 100s online won't know you're a cuck.
So in summary: The only "ideal girlfriend" must:
#1. Have no social media.
#2. Have no friends or group.
#3. Have no car.
#4. Live with her parents.
#5. Be ugly enough to not be hit on.
If all of the above conditions cannot be met, don't have a "girlfriend."
Situationships only.
Situationships > Relationships. It's better to have SITUATIONSHIPS than ONS/LTR
In our modern age, no matter your looks, it's best for guys to NEVER pass "situationship." That is, never be solidly locked down as a LTRcuck, ESPECIALLY if you're a guy who's sub 6. If you are, take what you can get & enjoy it. Make the best of it. But don't settle for one. Ever. Always...
looksmax.org
Last edited:
