If you're 21, you have no justification for flirting girls under 18.

[GolemRot]

It's that simple, from the moment you turn 21, you are already considered a grown man and you don't have to flirt with girls under 18.

Now, if you are under 20 years old, it's still completely acceptable to be attracted to 16-17 year old girls.

Leave the girls under 15 alone, I mean it.

I hope this post helps to finally clear up this whole tirade about the age difference in love / sexual relationships.

 

[GolemRot]

...

 

[sorrowfulsad]

idk

 

[TheEndHasNoEnd]

 

[Deleted member 6403]

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Provide no evidence or convincing argument but your own personal beliefs theory

 

[Deleted member 4612]

idk

OP just pulled shit out his ass

idk why he's worried though. laws are already put in place

Now, if you are under 20 years old, it's still completely acceptable to be attracted to 16-17 year old girls.

attracted? every man is attracted to 16-17 year old girls.

 

[Deleted member 10524]

@personalityinkwell

 

[Deleted member 10524]

OP just pulled shit out his ass

idk why he's worried though. laws are already put in place

attracted? every man is attracted to 16-17 year old girls.

jfl nvm ur already here

 

[Deleted member 6403]

Reminder that this is the same nigga that rejected a girl that wanted to fuck him just cause she was one year younger than him

 

[Deleted member 4612]

The permanent virtue signalling you hear from every pathetic retards who want attention and to be seen as a hero
"Yea we should kill and torture pedos I hate them smh"

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

I'm gonna turn 21 in a few months but 16/17 year old girls doesn't seem or feel wrong to me imo

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Reminder that this is the same nigga that rejected a girl that wanted to fuck him just cause she was one year younger than him

jfl link to that post?

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

Reminder that this is the same nigga that rejected a girl that wanted to fuck him just cause she was one year younger than him

Over for this low T greycel

 

[ReverseNorwoodPill]

Lol

 

[GolemRot]

Reminder that this is the same nigga that rejected a girl that wanted to fuck him just cause she was one year younger than him

She was 15 and I'm 19. Can you read well?

 

[Zyros]

what is this cuck ageist shit

 

[Deleted member 6403]

She was 15 and I'm 19. Can you read well?

She was old enough, I hope ur T levels recover soon bro!

 

[Troika]

Epic greycel moment

 

[GolemRot]

every man is attracted to 16-17 year old girls.

Are you sure that it's not your projection?

 

[Deleted member 4612]

Are you sure that it's not your projection?

omg you must be retarded

girls are FINISHED PUBERTY at 15-16.

if a man is not attracted to girls when they are finished puberty, when would he be attracted to them?

like seriously, how the fuck do you think biology works?

 

[GolemRot]

I hope ur T levels recover soon bro!

#MeToo

 

[Zyros]

Now, if you are under 20 years old, it's still completely acceptable to be attracted to 16-17 year old girls

explain why this is reasonable besides it being pure age discrimination agenda. judging by this paragraph its clearly not about girls maturity or "being preyed upon" if younger guys than arbitrary age get a pass. Either NOBODY gets a pass or its just hypocritical bullshit.

i hate male ageism.

 

[Deleted member 10172]

Reminder that this is the same nigga that rejected a girl that wanted to fuck him just cause she was one year younger than him

guy is actually a faggot if this is true

 

[GolemRot]

girls are FINISHED PUBERTY at 15-16.

if a man is not attracted to girls when they are finished puberty, when would he be attracted to them?

like seriously, how the fuck do you think biology works?

You said it yourself, in puberty. If you are a legal adult over the age of 21, you have NO justification to flirt with underage girls, no matter what they look like...

 

[Deleted member 4612]

You said it yourself, in puberty.

girls are FINISHED PUBERTY at 15-16.

can you read?

look, there is attraction and action

if you're saying there are laws put in place and people need to follow them , sure

but to deny its normal for men to like fully developed 16 year old girls is 0 iq

 

[Zyros]

You said it yourself, in puberty. If you are a legal adult over the age of 21, you have NO justification to flirt with underage girls, no matter what they look like...

anser my post, you cuck. Explain why we have no justification.

 

[ImmortalRizing]

Keep crying for me.

 

[Beetlejuice]

 

[GolemRot]

explain why this is reasonable besides it being pure age discrimination agenda. judging by this paragraph its clearly not about girls maturity or "being preyed upon" if younger guys than arbitrary age get a pass. Either NOBODY gets a pass or its just hypocritical bullshit.

i hate male ageism.

It's very simple, when you are under 20 years old, you usually don't have the same responsibilities that being adult entails; therefore, you can better relate to girls in your age range.

When you're over 21, your responsibilities and prospects for your future are supposed to be different.

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

Leave the girls under 15 alone, I mean it.

 

[Deleted member 9048]

View attachment 953767

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

You said it yourself, in puberty. If you are a legal adult over the age of 21, you have NO justification to flirt with underage girls, no matter what they look like...

then whats the true barrier? raw chronological age, or mental development? it can't be sexual development because girls are already nearing the end of puberty 16. so tell me, whats the barrier, the wall? why can't you be interested in an age group after a certain age? @personalityinkwell wtf is this guy on about

 

[Deleted member 2205]

Now, if you are under 20 years old, it's still completely acceptable to be attracted to 16-17 year old girls

But the moment you turn 21 it isn't okay? You do realize that there is little to no change between those 2 ages right?

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

Are you sure that it's not your projection?

 

[Deleted member 6403]

View attachment 953767

 

[GolemRot]

but to deny its normal for men to like fully developed 16 year old girls

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

You have sisters?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

You have sisters?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

Yes

 

[Deleted member 2205]

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

You have sisters?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

Morals are subjective.
And no I would not give a single fuck. My sister's sex life is none of my business.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

You have sisters?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

No, id force her to be a virgin

 

[Zyros]

It's very simple, when you are under 20 years old, you usually don't have the same responsibilities that being adult entails; therefore, you can better relate to girls in your age range.

When you're over 21, your responsibilities and prospects for your future are supposed to be different.

Theres 0 logic in this. What do responsibilities have to do with dating and attraction? And on top of that, so you turn 20 and suddenly poof, you have a ton of responsibilities out of nothing or something?

Quit bullshitting. I dated/hooked up both up to 12 years below my age and up to 15 years above my age while being around 30 and the "different levels of responsibility" didnt mean shit.

 

[GolemRot]

But the moment you turn 21 it isn't okay?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

Same question for you...

 

[Zyros]

But the moment you turn 21 it isn't okay? You do realize that there is little to no change between those 2 ages right?

its just hypocrite soy ageist shit

 

[Deleted member 2205]

Same question for you...

I just answered. Its none of my business, nor would I even care in the first place.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

You have sisters?

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy?

omg you keep flip flopping

there is "attraction" and "Action"

get this through your thick skull.

it is completely normal for men to be attracted to girls 15-17 who are finished puberty

If you had a sister, 15 years old with a "developed" body, would you tolerate her dating with a 21 years old guy

I honestly would. but that of course is my opinion

what is not an opinion, is that it is completely normal for men to be attracted to girls who are finished puberty even if they are under 18

 

[Deleted member 4612]

I'm not denying it, just from my perspective, it's not correct.

wait what? this doesn't make sense

 

[GolemRot]

 

[Troika]

It's very easy to troll on this forum, DAMN IT. I'm little drunk....

"It's very easy to troll on this forum, DAMN IT. I'm little drunk...."

 

[Deleted member 2205]

It's very easy to troll on this forum, DAMN IT. I'm little drunk....

"It was just a joke bro"

 

[GolemRot]

View attachment 953791

"It's very easy to troll on this forum, DAMN IT. I'm little drunk...."

I mean IT