If youre consuming raw milk…

Raw animal milk literally has the same exact listed benefits of breast milk u dumb fuck. Lactoferrin, lysozyme, oligosaccharides, the same beneficial microbacteria, etc. Stop listening to mainstream health media oh my god
Ima make sure if i have a kid hes breastfed for super long and gets hella raw milk, then that nigga can eat whatever later on, he will thank me for saving his height
 
Literally drinking it rn

Have been drinking 2 liter a day everyday up to a gallon a day sometimes FOR A YEAR

Nothing happened retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz
fact is im not a fucking jew
and raw milks retards only argument is to bring up jews not actually talking about raw milk itself
just cuz they haven’t gotten sick
a kid literally died today in italy because of raw milk
raw milk/food enjoyers are very very retarded
they think if theres bacteria in their food causes them to be natural
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: heightmax and turkcelfatcel
Still no argument no proof fuck off putting you on ignore
Fuck you nigga kys no one likes you i litteraly srnt you proof you just cant accept the fact
 
  • +1
Reactions: heightmax
doesnt give health benefits but if it is like the only fucking thing u grow up drinking... yes ur gonna grow tall as fuck? The fuck?

There are tribes who only survive of raw milk and grow tall as fuck. Why are we coping? Im against diet cope and i dont think anyone should be doing it now in their teenage or adult years cuz theres virturally 0 benefit, it isnt necessarily healthy and worth the money ur paying for it.

Are we honestly so fucking retarded to think that some people were just brought in out of no where and were tall? Lol. Meat helps you grow width, raw dairy makes u grow height, this is fact.

A lot of niggas with the genetics for height, may just end up growing vertically by eating goy cuz of this. Are they reaching south sudanese levels of height tho? No?
before i start i want to state that height is (approximately) 75% genetics and 25% environmental

diet is very very important for height growth; calcium and proteins especially.
I myself have very very high calcium levels (i drink pasteurized milk everyday and yoghurt sometimes)

raw milk has no relevant benefits compared to pasteurized milk:

Nutrient / ComponentRaw MilkPasteurized MilkRelevant Difference?
Total proteins3.2–3.4 g/100 mL3.2–3.4 g/100 mLNo significant loss
Caseins~80% of proteinsUnchangedNo difference
Whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin)IntactSlight denaturation of some proteinsDoes not affect nutritional value
Total fats3.5–3.9 g/100 mL3.5–3.9 g/100 mLUnchanged
Fatty acid profileNormal distribution (SFA, MUFA, PUFA)Practically unchangedNo difference
Lactose~4.7 g/100 mL~4.7 g/100 mLUnchanged
Calcium and mineralsHigh bioavailabilityIdentical bioavailabilityNo difference
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin)~0.18 mg/100 mL~0.18 mg/100 mLNo difference
Vitamin B12~0.4 µg/100 mL~0.4 µg/100 mLNo difference
Vitamins A and DFat-soluble, stableHeat-stableNo difference
Vitamin C~1.0–2.0 mg/100 mLReduced 10–20%Milk is not a significant source of Vit. C
Enzymes (alkaline phosphatase, lipase, lactoperoxidase)ActiveInactivated by heatBiochemical difference, not nutritional
Immune components (e.g., antibodies, lysozyme)Present in small amounts (not useful for adults)DenaturedNot nutritionally relevant

SO WHY WOULD YOU DRINK RAW MILK?
no benefits at all
“but ehhh im healthier now” milk is super nutritious thats why you’re healthier raw milk is just milk with RELEVANT DEATH RISKS
 
raw milk/food enjoyers are very very retarded
they think if theres bacteria in their food causes them to be natural
bro you’re totally a brainwashed jew if you think salmonella isn’t gonna give you a10 hunter eyes
 
It’s true that some people consume raw milk, raw eggs, raw meat, and raw honey without immediately experiencing illness, but that doesn’t mean the practice is safe or risk-free. The key point is that foodborne pathogens don’t always cause noticeable symptoms right away, and infection risk isn’t distributed evenly across individuals.

there are studies about this nigga…
you can keep copeing if you want
dnr
IMG 3650
 
before i start i want to state that height is (approximately) 75% genetics and 25% environmental

diet is very very important for height growth; calcium and proteins especially.
I myself have very very high calcium levels (i drink pasteurized milk everyday and yoghurt sometimes)

raw milk has no relevant benefits compared to pasteurized milk:

Nutrient / ComponentRaw MilkPasteurized MilkRelevant Difference?
Total proteins3.2–3.4 g/100 mL3.2–3.4 g/100 mLNo significant loss
Caseins~80% of proteinsUnchangedNo difference
Whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin, α-lactalbumin)IntactSlight denaturation of some proteinsDoes not affect nutritional value
Total fats3.5–3.9 g/100 mL3.5–3.9 g/100 mLUnchanged
Fatty acid profileNormal distribution (SFA, MUFA, PUFA)Practically unchangedNo difference
Lactose~4.7 g/100 mL~4.7 g/100 mLUnchanged
Calcium and mineralsHigh bioavailabilityIdentical bioavailabilityNo difference
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin)~0.18 mg/100 mL~0.18 mg/100 mLNo difference
Vitamin B12~0.4 µg/100 mL~0.4 µg/100 mLNo difference
Vitamins A and DFat-soluble, stableHeat-stableNo difference
Vitamin C~1.0–2.0 mg/100 mLReduced 10–20%Milk is not a significant source of Vit. C
Enzymes (alkaline phosphatase, lipase, lactoperoxidase)ActiveInactivated by heatBiochemical difference, not nutritional
Immune components (e.g., antibodies, lysozyme)Present in small amounts (not useful for adults)DenaturedNot nutritionally relevant

SO WHY WOULD YOU DRINK RAW MILK?
no benefits at all
“but ehhh im healthier now” milk is super nutritious thats why you’re healthier raw milk is just milk with RELEVANT DEATH RISKS
u didnt bring up everything thats missing lol u brought up macronutrients and like 4 of the main vitamins. Is this meant to be rage bait?

Pasteurized milk if its full fat is good, but u cant live off it, people can live off raw milk and thrive not eating anything. This should be proof enough that pasteruzied milk is missing in quite a few nutrients.

if a nigga is malnourished in victorian england eating bread, he will grow to like 5'6 jfl. Some nigga with same genes as him growing up on a farm in netherlands is gonna be over 6 foot. Ur right. It is "25% envireonmental" cuz if a guy who was 6 foot was 25% shorter he would be 4'6.

The way u present it is like ur misleading niggas. 25% if fucking massive. A couple inches of height are a few percentage points and decide ur status, wealth, attraction from opposite gender so much :lul::lul::lul:
 
u didnt bring up everything thats missing lol u brought up macronutrients and like 4 of the main vitamins. Is this meant to be rage bait?

Pasteurized milk if its full fat is good, but u cant live off it, people can live off raw milk and thrive not eating anything. This should be proof enough that pasteruzied milk is missing in quite a few nutrients.

if a nigga is malnourished in victorian england eating bread, he will grow to like 5'6 jfl. Some nigga with same genes as him growing up on a farm in netherlands is gonna be over 6 foot. Ur right. It is "25% envireonmental" cuz if a guy who was 6 foot was 25% shorter he would be 4'6.

The way u present it is like ur misleading niggas. 25% if fucking massive. A couple inches of height are a few percentage points and decide ur status, wealth, attraction from opposite gender so much :lul::lul::lul:
CategoryNutrient / CompoundRaw MilkPasteurized MilkRelevant Difference?
MacronutrientsWater (~87%)PresentPresentNo difference
Proteins (3.2–3.4 g/100 mL)PresentPresentNo loss
– Caseins (~80% of proteins)IntactIntactNo difference
– Whey proteins (α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, serum albumin, lactoferrin, immunoglobulins)IntactSome denaturation of β-lactoglobulin, Ig, lactoferrinMinor change, not nutritionally significant
Lipids (3.5–3.9 g/100 mL)PresentPresentNo difference
– Fatty acids: SFA, MUFA, PUFA, CLA, omega-3, omega-6PresentPresentStable
Carbohydrates (mainly lactose, ~4.7 g/100 mL)PresentPresentNo difference
Oligosaccharides (trace amounts)PresentLargely intactMinimal difference
MineralsCalciumHigh bioavailabilityStableNo difference
PhosphorusPresentStableNo difference
MagnesiumPresentStableNo difference
PotassiumPresentStableNo difference
SodiumPresentStableNo difference
ZincPresentStableNo difference
Iron (very low)TraceTraceNo difference
Iodine, selenium, manganese (trace)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamins (fat-soluble)Vitamin A (retinol, carotenoids)StableStableNo difference
Vitamin D (when present naturally or fortified)StableStableNo difference
Vitamin E (tocopherols)StableStableNo difference
Vitamin KStableStableNo difference
Vitamins (water-soluble)Vitamin B1 (thiamine)PresentMinimal loss (<5%)Negligible
Vitamin B2 (riboflavin)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B3 (niacin)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B5 (pantothenic acid)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B6 (pyridoxine)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B7 (biotin)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B9 (folate)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin B12 (cobalamin)PresentStableNo difference
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid)1.0–2.0 mg/100 mLReduced 10–20%Slight reduction, but milk is not a significant source
EnzymesAlkaline phosphataseActiveInactivatedUsed as pasteurization marker
LipaseActiveInactivatedAffects fat hydrolysis, not nutrition
LactoperoxidaseActiveInactivatedAntimicrobial enzyme, not essential nutritionally
CatalaseActiveInactivatedNot nutritionally relevant
Immune & Bioactive FactorsImmunoglobulins (IgA, IgM, IgG)Present in small amountsLargely denaturedNot nutritionally relevant in adults
LysozymePresentDenaturedMinor relevance
LactoferrinPresentPartially denaturedMinimal effect
Growth factors, cytokinesTraceInactivatedNot nutritionally relevant in adults
Other CompoundsHormones (insulin, IGF-1, steroid hormones in trace amounts)PresentStableNo significant nutritional role
Microbiota (commensal bacteria from animal/environment)PresentDestroyed by heatLoss of microbial flora (safety benefit)

There continues to be considerable public debate on the possible benefits regarding the growing popularity of the consumption of raw milk. However, there are significant concerns by regulatory, or public health, organizations like the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention because of risk of contracting milkborne illnesses if the raw milk is contaminated with human pathogens. This review describes why pasteurization of milk was introduced more than 100 years ago, how pasteurization helped to reduce the incidence of illnesses associated with raw milk consumption, and the prevalence of pathogens in raw milk. In some studies, up to a third of all raw milk samples contained pathogens, even when sourced from clinically healthy animals or from milk that appeared to be of good quality. This review critically evaluates some of the popularly suggested benefits of raw milk. Claims related to improved nutrition, prevention of lactose intolerance, or provision of “good” bacteria from the consumption of raw milk have no scientific basis and are myths. There are some epidemiological data that indicate that children growing up in a farming environment are associated with a decreased risk of allergy and asthma; a variety of environmental factors may be involved and there is no direct evidence that raw milk consumption is involved in any “protective” effect.
BACKGROUND
In 1908, Chicago became the first US city to introduce cow’s milk pasteurization into municipal law (except for cows that were certified tuberculosis-free). However, it took another 8 years before it was fully adopted in Chicago owing to political wrangling and a debate over “pure milk”(raw milk) versus “purified milk”(pasteurized milk). 1 Around that time, public health officials became greatly worried about the transmission of bovine tuberculosis from cow’s milk to humans. By 1900, it was estimated that as many as 10% of all tuberculosis cases in humans were caused by infection via milk consumption, and in 1910, a tuberculosis epidemic spread through Illinois, infecting over 300 000 cattle. 1 Certification of herds as tuberculosis-free became very difficult to manage/administer, and pasteurization became increasingly popular because of its ability to process large quantities of milk in a cost-effective approach. Tuberculosis was 1 of the major human health concerns of the early part of the last century; for example, between 1912 and 1937, it is estimated that about 65 000 persons in England and Wales died of tuberculosis that originated from bovine sources. 2

Cases documented and cited in credible news sources

1. Italy – Streptococcus zooepidemicus infection

In central Italy, between November 2021 and May 2022, an outbreak linked to the consumption of unpasteurized fresh cheeses caused five deaths from meningitis in patients aged 6 to 98 years.



2. United States – Listeriosis from raw cheese

One case in the United States involved soft cheeses made from raw milk produced by Vulto Creamery (the “Ouleout” model). The outbreak resulted in two deaths and four cases of related illness.



3. Australia – Child dies from raw milk 'bath milk'

In 2014, a 3-year-old boy died of multiple organ failure (hemolytic uremic syndrome, HUS) after drinking raw milk sold as "bath milk" (not for human consumption). The coroner confirmed that the most likely cause was raw milk.



4. Florida (USA) – Pregnant woman abandons premature baby

A Florida mother filed a lawsuit against a farm, claiming she lost her fetus after contracting Campylobacter while caring for her sick child, who had drunk raw milk. The product was sold as "for animal consumption," but it also caused illness in the mother.



5. Tennessee (USA) – Newborn with Kidney Failure

In a recent case, two infants contracted E. coli (STEC) infections after drinking raw milk from a cow-share program. One of the infants developed kidney failure (HUS) and was hospitalized for 27 days. No deaths were reported, but the consequences were serious.



6. United States – Salmonella Outbreak

In California, at least 165 people became ill from Salmonella infections linked to raw milk produced by Raw Farm. No deaths were confirmed, but it was the largest outbreak of its kind in the past decade.


• "75% genetics, 25% environment" doesn't mean you can grow 16 inches taller by improving your diet.
• It means that genetics determines your potential height range (e.g., 5'7"–5'11"), and your environment decides where you fit within that range.
• If you're genetically destined to be 5'4", your optimal environment may help you a little, but it won't get you to 6'11".
 
you’re fucking dumb you’re potentially intoxicating yourself
and you could die from fucking milk 😭🤣
brainwashed slave

come and cage with me @asdvek and @Never Get Up
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Never Get Up and asdvek
Milk is literally fat mixed with sugar. Ages you like crazy
 
bone health, antibacterial properties, Rich in nutrients, anti inflammatory and immune support, and high in probiotics :lul:
kefir>milk
but….
CategoryRaw Goat KefirPasteurized Goat KefirKey Difference
MacronutrientsProteins partly hydrolyzed, Fat intact, Lactose reducedSame effect: proteins hydrolyzed, lactose reducedNo big difference
Proteins & PeptidesNative milk proteins + breakdown by both milk microbes and kefir microbes → slightly more diverse peptidesProteins hydrolyzed mainly by kefir microbes onlyRaw kefir may have broader peptide profile
LipidsFatty acid profile preserved; native lipases + microbial lipases actNative lipases inactivated by pasteurization; only microbial lipases activeRaw kefir may have slightly more free fatty acids
CarbohydratesLactose reduced; lactic acid, ethanol, COâ‚‚ formedSame outcomeNearly identical
MineralsCalcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium → unchangedSameNo difference
Vitamins (fat-soluble)A, D, E, K → stableStableNo difference
Vitamins (water-soluble)B1, B2, B6, B9, B12, biotin → increased via microbial synthesis; Vitamin C slightly reducedSame increase, but slightly less in some studies due to reduced initial microbial diversityRaw kefir may have marginally higher B vitamins
EnzymesContains some native raw milk enzymes (phosphatase, lactoperoxidase, catalase, lipase) + microbial enzymesNative enzymes destroyed by pasteurization; only microbial enzymes presentRaw kefir has more enzymatic diversity
Bioactive CompoundsBioactive peptides + kefiran (exopolysaccharide) + possible native immune factors partly preservedBioactive peptides + kefiran, but no native immune proteins (destroyed by pasteurization)Raw kefir has slightly more immunological variety
MicrobesMicrobiota from raw milk + kefir grains → higher diversity, including environmental strains (beneficial or potentially harmful)Microbiota only from kefir grains → more controlled, predictableRaw kefir = more diverse; Pasteurized kefir = safer, standardized
SafetyHigher risk of pathogens surviving if raw milk contaminated (e.g. E. coli O157, Salmonella, Listeria)Lower risk, since pasteurization eliminates pathogens before fermentationPasteurized kefir is considered safer

WHY RAW?
 
kefir>milk
but….
CategoryRaw Goat KefirPasteurized Goat KefirKey Difference
MacronutrientsProteins partly hydrolyzed, Fat intact, Lactose reducedSame effect: proteins hydrolyzed, lactose reducedNo big difference
Proteins & PeptidesNative milk proteins + breakdown by both milk microbes and kefir microbes → slightly more diverse peptidesProteins hydrolyzed mainly by kefir microbes onlyRaw kefir may have broader peptide profile
LipidsFatty acid profile preserved; native lipases + microbial lipases actNative lipases inactivated by pasteurization; only microbial lipases activeRaw kefir may have slightly more free fatty acids
CarbohydratesLactose reduced; lactic acid, ethanol, COâ‚‚ formedSame outcomeNearly identical
MineralsCalcium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, sodium → unchangedSameNo difference
Vitamins (fat-soluble)A, D, E, K → stableStableNo difference
Vitamins (water-soluble)B1, B2, B6, B9, B12, biotin → increased via microbial synthesis; Vitamin C slightly reducedSame increase, but slightly less in some studies due to reduced initial microbial diversityRaw kefir may have marginally higher B vitamins
EnzymesContains some native raw milk enzymes (phosphatase, lactoperoxidase, catalase, lipase) + microbial enzymesNative enzymes destroyed by pasteurization; only microbial enzymes presentRaw kefir has more enzymatic diversity
Bioactive CompoundsBioactive peptides + kefiran (exopolysaccharide) + possible native immune factors partly preservedBioactive peptides + kefiran, but no native immune proteins (destroyed by pasteurization)Raw kefir has slightly more immunological variety
MicrobesMicrobiota from raw milk + kefir grains → higher diversity, including environmental strains (beneficial or potentially harmful)Microbiota only from kefir grains → more controlled, predictableRaw kefir = more diverse; Pasteurized kefir = safer, standardized
SafetyHigher risk of pathogens surviving if raw milk contaminated (e.g. E. coli O157, Salmonella, Listeria)Lower risk, since pasteurization eliminates pathogens before fermentationPasteurized kefir is considered safer

WHY RAW?
this nigga expects me to read his gptslop
:LOL:
 
im low iq, yet you use gpt.?
cuz its a whole lotta work to text all this
i quote actual studies tho does it really matter if i use chatgpt?
 

Similar threads

Bryce
Replies
9
Views
98
Bryce
Bryce
Node
Replies
8
Views
63
scraggy
scraggy
Tyler1
Replies
5
Views
62
Node
Node
Tyler1
Replies
2
Views
122
Tyler1
Tyler1
fwhr
Replies
11
Views
155
yoyoyo123123
yoyoyo123123

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top