5” isn’t the average, that’s 4.59”. Maybe you’re referring to a smaller study but those are unreliable, plus participation bias is a thing. People who are convinced they’re big will have an easier time participating. Those with obvious smaller cocks would refrain from participating. When it comes to studies; it’s quantity that matters. I refer to the mega-study with 15,000+ participants.
I was talking about myself
Spoke too soon, i will be joining you in the studies of the cock. We shall study together like monks, our wisdom shall be passed on for generations.I am probably the world’s first and last virgin cockologist.
No your friends aren’t LARPing. They measure their dick from their anus so their method is just wrong. 19-21cm is entirely possible in general BUT to have multiple friends claim this… it’s just LARP. You have slightly above average length and girth, perfectly fine for LTRs - in fact probably even more preferable for various reasons.
Let’s do it bhai
I’m a curry cockologistIm talking about the real average, Men 18-40, non asian, non obese. Probably from 4.8-5.
Definitely not near 5.0”, and obesity doesn’t even affect penis size lol, especially not girth, otherwise fat mfers would be having insane girth which isn’t the case, the real average is 4.59” (with participation bias so could be lower in fact)
PRENATAL estrogen & testosterone affects dick size. So these things are entirely out of your control.More fat = more estrogen= smaller dick, smaller girth
That's cope af bro
Good job op, high iq.
Bhai it’s the scientists who are responsible for the information I have
Thanks bhai , no need to be real chico when you have a chico personality
That’s not what scientists say lolYeah sure
A low T man would have a giant cock
