unkownincel
Certified kindness spreader™
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2025
- Posts
- 1,508
- Reputation
- 4,756
Im always thinking about life, i make up my own quotes which are high iq
@foidletslayer
@foidletslayer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Make me a quote rn & do u know what the prefix -ism stands for?Im always thinking about life, i make up my own quotes which are high iq
@foidletslayer
a beliefrefix -ism stands for
Correct, thoughts on free will conceptually?a belief
we all have free willCorrect, thoughts on free will conceptually?
What shapes free willwe all have free will
consequences affect what you do with it.
even with a gun to your head u have a choice
Sorry, i dont understand. Ig im not a philosopherWhat shapes free will
at the end of the day we all come up with concepts and quotes that already exist because unfortunately we're not special, we just have a rare thinking style compared to the average personIm always thinking about life, i make up my own quotes which are high iq
@foidletslayer
free will doesn't really exist in my opinion, because you do not really like something because you genuinely like it, but rather because your brain chemistry was leaning towards that option on it's ownWhat shapes free will
What ur explaining isn’t free will as a concept or actfree will doesn't really exist in my opinion, because you do not really like something because you genuinely like it, but rather because your brain chemistry was leaning towards that option on it's own
yeah that is my point, what people call '‘free will’' is just the brain’s predetermined tendencies playing out, The concept exists, but the underlying freedom doesn’t.What ur explaining isn’t free will as a concept or act
what a fucking moron he isWhat ur explaining isn’t free will as a concept or act
it was satrical?youre a fucking moron poser who knows nothing about philosophy please shut up, i liked u until this
i hope so brotatocelit was satrical?
That’s mechanism. Free will is the ability of an agent to make choices that are genuinely their own, not fully determined by external circumstances or internal necessity, such that alternative actions remain possible. A person who has a conscious possesses free will btwyeah that is my point, what people call '‘free will’' is just the brain’s predetermined tendencies playing out, The concept exists, but the underlying freedom doesn’t.
You also know nothing of philosophy stop larpingyoure a fucking moron poser who knows nothing about philosophy please shut up, i liked u until this
So your brain isn't you, so who are youfree will doesn't really exist in my opinion, because you do not really like something because you genuinely like it, but rather because your brain chemistry was leaning towards that option on it's own
im not fucking larping you fuck nigger ive been studying for multiple years jflYou also know nothing of philosophy stop larping
is duddSo your brain isn't you, so who's you
Isn't ism a suffix since you add it to the end of the word? And it doesn't stand for anything, not an acronym just a suffix for and doctrines or systemsMake me a quote rn & do u know what the prefix -ism stands for?
The individual which is further shaped by culture and behaviour which is based on luck and spawnpointWhat shapes free will
Sure you have, explain to me individualism & until u provide proof for that ur a larpim not fucking larping you fuck nigger ive been studying for multiple years jfl
I'm know nothing of philosophyim not fucking larping you fuck nigger ive been studying for multiple years jfl
I confuse suffixs and prefixes a lotIsn't ism a suffix since you add it to the end of the word? And it doesn't stand for anything, not an acronym just a suffix for and doctrines or systems
That definition assumes the persons choices are genuinely their own. My point is that the feeling of '‘genuine’' choice doesn’t prove the choice wasn’t determined by internal necessity. If your preferences, tendencies, and decision-making patterns all come from brain structure, chemistry, and prior causes, then the alternatives never actually stood a real chance. Consciousness doesn’t grant freedom, it just gives us awareness of decisions that were already shaped by internal conditions.That’s mechanism. Free will is the ability of an agent to make choices that are genuinely their own, not fully determined by external circumstances or internal necessity, such that alternative actions remain possible. A person who has a conscious possesses free will btw
i mirin ur studies too brah, human mind really is amazing to know aboutI'm know nothing of philosophyI study psychology
Thoughts on relativism?I'm know nothing of philosophyI study psychology
Ah well what helped me when I was learning as a kid is "pre" means prior as in before so it just logically made more sense to be before the word and through an educated guess suffix will be at the endI confuse suffixs and prefixes a lot
The brain is me, but that doesn’t mean the '‘me’' is free. My identity is still built from biology and conditions I didn’t control, so the chooser exists but the choices aren’t self-createdSo your brain isn't you, so who's you
Fact of life, nothing is always set in stone, even 2+2 equating to 4 can be questionedThoughts on relativism?
What authorsim not fucking larping you fuck nigger ive been studying for multiple years jfl
So the individual doesn't exist only a collective or groupThe individual which is further shaped by culture and behaviour which is based on luck and spawnpoint
"Ism" means movement, moving.Ah well what helped me when I was learning as a kid is "pre" means prior as in before so it just logically made more sense to be before the word and through an educated guess suffix will be at the end![]()
You contradicted yourself, based on your opinion a chooser doesn't exist. Your body is a machine. "Chooser" means an entity with free will that's cappable of doing things with the beings around him, it's a subject not an object. You just decided to reply, you could have dediced not to. Denying free will is you trying to avoid responsability, inmoral.The brain is me, but that doesn’t mean the '‘me’' is free. My identity is still built from biology and conditions I didn’t control, so the chooser exists but the choices aren’t self-created
And behaviour, which is again influenced by culture and upbringing so technically yes, noone is their own personSo the individual doesn't exist only a collective or group
You sure you didn't reply to the wrong thing? I was explaining how I learnt to differentiate suffixes from prefixes I'm seeing no correlation"Ism" means movement, moving.
While it’s true that our brain, tendencies, and prior causes shape choices, I’m arguing that (Dennett agrees with) freedom is about acting according to one’s deliberation and desires, not the absence of causal influence. Conscious awareness and the ability to reason, reflect, and act on values constitute a meaningful form of free will, even if the choices are influenced by prior conditions. So determinism does not logically negate genuine freedomThat definition assumes the persons choices are genuinely their own. My point is that the feeling of '‘genuine’' choice doesn’t prove the choice wasn’t determined by internal necessity. If your preferences, tendencies, and decision-making patterns all come from brain structure, chemistry, and prior causes, then the alternatives never actually stood a real chance. Consciousness doesn’t grant freedom, it just gives us awareness of decisions that were already shaped by internal conditions.
guess who my favorite is, ill give you a hint, he haves a huge mustacheWhat authors
So the individual doesn't exist only a collective or group
"Ism" means movement, moving.
You contradicted yourself, based on your opinion a chooser doesn't exist. Your body is a machine. "Chooser" means an entity with free will that's cappable of doing things with the beings around him, it's a subject not an object. You just decided to reply, you could have dediced not to. Denying free will is you trying to avoid responsability, inmoral.
I disagreeFact of life, nothing is always set in stone, even 2+2 equating to 4 can be questioned
I’m not contradicting myself, I’m saying the '‘chooser’' is the brain. When I say choices aren’t free, I’m not saying choices don’t happen, i’m saying they’re the output of a physical system aka your brain, with certain wiring, chemistry, and tendenciesYou contradicted yourself, based on your opinion a chooser doesn't exist. Your body is a machine. "Chooser" means an entity with free will that's cappable of doing things with the beings around him, it's a subject not an object. You just decided to reply, you could have dediced not to.
I think behavior is entirely social but every individual has their own style, everyone chooses how to be in certain moments. There are exceptions to the rule, even in environments that tell you how you should behave.And behaviour, which is again influenced by culture and upbringing so technically yes, noone is their own person
You sure you didn't reply to the wrong thing? I was explaining how I learnt to differentiate suffixes from prefixes I'm seeing no correlation
guess who my favorite is, ill give you a hint, he haves a huge mustache
That's why it's philosophy and not fact, debate of opinionsI disagree
I can objectively prove that 2+2=4 therefore effectively refuting radical relativismThat's why it's philosophy and not fact, debate of opinions![]()
Fair enough but maths is too objective for a concept like relativism, imo it has more real world applicationsI can objectively prove that 2+2=4 therefore effectively refuting radical relativism
A brain cannot choose, objects can't choose. Only an individual is able to choose, and this is the subject which is obviously affected by your brain but your personality depends on the experiences you had through your entire life, so when the "brain" chooses the brain is you. A subject is able to retain, replace and add information with his free will and own judgment, there isn't a rule. The machine doesn't interact with the world, a human sets the machine to move with another objects. I can decide wether to think about this answer or just rage. The brain is my weapon, not me.I’m not contradicting myself, I’m saying the '‘chooser’' is the brain. When I say choices aren’t free, I’m not saying choices don’t happen, i’m saying they’re the output of a physical system aka your brain, with certain wiring, chemistry, and tendencies
A machine can still act, respond, and interact with the world. What it can’t do is choose independent of the mechanisms that generate its behavior. So the chooser exists, it’s just not a separate free-floating entity, it’s the brain’s deterministic processes acting as a unified subject
The truth of math relies in our logical brain.I can objectively prove that 2+2=4 therefore effectively refuting radical relativism
do you believe that logic exists before humans and that we discovered it or otherwise?The truth of math relies in our logical brain.
Before humans or before the world was created.do you believe that logic exists before humans and that we discovered it or otherwise?
What I asked in my last postBefore humans or before the world was created.